Organization and Use of the Mental Lexicon by Deaf and Hearing Individuals

Two experiments explored the taxonomic organization of mental lexicons in deaf and hearing college students. Experiment 1 used a single-word association task to examine relations between categories and their members. Results indicated that both groups' lexical knowledge is similar in terms of overall organization, with associations between category names and exemplars stronger for hearing students; only the deaf students showed asymmetrical exemplar-category relations. Experiment 2 used verbal analogies to explore the application of taxonomic knowledge in an academically relevant task. Significant differences between deaf and hearing students were obtained for six types of analogies, although deaf students who were better readers displayed response patterns more like hearing students'. Hearing students' responses reflected their lexical organization; deaf students' did not. These findings implicate the interaction of word knowledge, world knowledge, and literacy skills, emphasizing the need to adapt instructional methods to student knowledge in educational contexts.

[1]  Marc Marschark,et al.  Problem-solving by deaf and hearing students: twenty questions , 1999 .

[2]  I. Fischler.  Word Recognition, Use of Context, and Reading Skill among Deaf College Students. , 1985 .

[3]  M. Pratt,et al.  Word association and the acquisition of reading , 1986 .

[4]  C. Gray,et al.  The written recall of printed stories by severely deaf children. , 1990, The British journal of educational psychology.

[5]  L. S. Liben.  Free recall by deaf and hearing children: semantic clustering and recall in trained and untrained groups. , 1979, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[6]  B. Strassman,et al.  Metacognition and reading in children who are deaf: a review of the research. , 1997, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[7]  V. Vīķis-Freibergs,et al.  Free association norms in French and English: Inter-linguistic and intra-linguistic comparisons. , 1976 .

[8]  M. Marschark,et al.  Psychological perspectives on deafness , 2014 .

[9]  R. Mitchell,et al.  Chasing the Mythical Ten Percent: Parental Hearing Status of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students in the United States , 2004 .

[10]  L. Thompson,et al.  What is so special about special education? , 1997, The American psychologist.

[11]  E. Ottem.  An Analysis of Cognitive Studies With Deaf Subjects , 1980, American annals of the deaf.

[12]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[13]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[14]  J. Todman,et al.  Visual-action code processing by deaf and hearing children , 1994 .

[15]  M. Marschark,et al.  The Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education , 2003 .

[16]  W. A. Bousfield.  The Occurrence of Clustering in the Recall of Randomly Arranged Associates , 1953 .

[17]  C. B. Traxler,et al.  The Stanford Achievement Test, 9th Edition: National Norming and Performance Standards for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students. , 2000, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[18]  U. Goswami.  Analogical reasoning in children , 1993 .

[19]  Marc Marschark,et al.  Raising and Educating a Deaf Child , 2009, DECP Debate.

[20]  S. D. Koh,et al.  Free-recall learning of word lists by prelingual deaf subjects , 1971 .

[21]  M. Marschark,et al.  Comparing the mental lexicons of deaf and hearing individuals. , 1999 .

[22]  J. Deese.  The structure of associations in language and thought , 1966 .

[23]  N. Kerr,et al.  Word norms for blind and sighted subjects: Familiarity, concreteness, meaningfulness, imageability, imagery modality, and word associations , 1991 .

[24]  R. Chaffin,et al.  Associations to unfamiliar words: Learning the meanings of new words , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[25]  D. F. Moores,et al.  Educating the Deaf: Psychology, Principles, and Practices , 2000 .

[26]  Trey Hedden,et al.  Category norms as a function of culture and age: comparisons of item responses to 105 categories by american and chinese adults. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[27]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Tongue-twister effects in the silent reading of hearing and deaf college students☆ , 1991 .

[28]  R. Tweney,et al.  Semantic organization in deaf and hearing subjects , 1975, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.

[29]  R. Kretschmer,et al.  The instantiation of general terms by deaf adolescents/adults. , 1987, Journal of communication disorders.