VisAR: Bringing Interactivity to Static Data Visualizations through Augmented Reality

Static visualizations have analytic and expressive value. However, many interactive tasks cannot be completed using static visualizations. As datasets grow in size and complexity, static visualizations start losing their analytic and expressive power for interactive data exploration. Despite this limitation of static visualizations, there are still many cases where visualizations are limited to being static (e.g., visualizations on presentation slides or posters). We believe in many of these cases, static visualizations will benefit from allowing users to perform interactive tasks on them. Inspired by the introduction of numerous commercial personal augmented reality (AR) devices, we propose an AR solution that allows interactive data exploration of datasets on static visualizations. In particular, we present a prototype system named VisAR that uses the Microsoft Hololens to enable users to complete interactive tasks on static visualizations.

[1]  Mark Billinghurst,et al.  The mixed reality book: a new multimedia reading experience , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[2]  Sean Hayes,et al.  Using augmented reality for visualizing complex graphs in three dimensions , 2003, The Second IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2003. Proceedings..

[3]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Value-driven evaluation of visualizations , 2014, BELIV.

[4]  Chris Dede,et al.  Affordances and Limitations of Immersive Participatory Augmented Reality Simulations for Teaching and Learning , 2009 .

[5]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Hedgehog labeling: View management techniques for external labels in 3D space , 2014, 2014 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[6]  Sean White,et al.  Interaction and presentation techniques for situated visualization , 2009 .

[7]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  The invisible train: a collaborative handheld augmented reality demonstrator , 2004, SIGGRAPH '04.

[8]  Heedong Ko,et al.  An Evaluation of an Augmented Reality Multimodal Interface Using Speech and Paddle Gestures , 2006, ICAT.

[9]  Mark Billinghurst,et al.  Augmented Reality in the Classroom , 2012, Computer.

[10]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Natural Language Interfaces for Data Analysis with Visualization: Considering What Has and Could Be Asked , 2017, EuroVis.

[11]  Stephen G. Kobourov,et al.  Node, Node-Link, and Node-Link-Group Diagrams: An Evaluation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[12]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  The MagicBook - Moving Seamlessly between Reality and Virtuality , 2001, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[13]  Chris Dede,et al.  EcoMOBILE: Integrating augmented reality and probeware with environmental education field trips , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Tim Dwyer,et al.  Design space for spatio-data coordination: Tangible interaction devices for immersive information visualisation , 2017, 2017 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis).

[15]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  View management for virtual and augmented reality , 2001, UIST '01.

[16]  Steve Mann,et al.  EyeTap Devices for Augmented, Deliberately Diminished, or Otherwise Altered Visual Perception of Rigid Planar Patches of Real-World Scenes , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[17]  Alex Endert,et al.  Beyond Usability and Performance: A Review of User Experience-focused Evaluations in Visualization , 2016, BELIV '16.

[18]  Stephen G. Kobourov,et al.  Comparing Node‐Link and Node‐Link‐Group Visualizations From An Enjoyment Perspective , 2016, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[19]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Toward a Deeper Understanding of the Role of Interaction in Information Visualization , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[20]  Chris North,et al.  Information-rich virtual environments: theory, tools, and research agenda , 2003, VRST '03.