A Large-Scale Analysis of Facebook’s User-Base and User Engagement Growth

Understanding the evolution of the user base as well as the user engagement of online services is critical not only for the service operators but also for customers, investors, and users. While we can find research works addressing this issue in online services, such as Twitter, MySpace, or Google+, such detailed analysis is missing for Facebook, which is currently the largest online social network. This paper presents the first detailed study on the demographic and geographic composition and evolution of the user base and user engagement in Facebook over a period of three years. To this end, we have implemented a measurement methodology that leverages the marketing API of Facebook to retrieve actual information about the number of total users and the number of daily active users across 230 countries and age groups ranging between 13 and 65+. The conducted analysis reveals that Facebook is still growing and geographically expanding. Moreover, the growth pattern is heterogeneous across age groups, genders, and geographical regions. In particular, from a demography perspective, Facebook shows the lowest growth pattern among adolescents. Gender-based analysis showed that growth among men is still higher than the growth in women. Our geographical analysis reveals that while Facebook growth is slower in western countries, it has the fastest growth in the developing countries mainly located in Africa and Central Asia; analyzing the penetration of these countries also shows that these countries are at earlier stages of Facebook penetration. Leveraging external socioeconomic datasets, we also showed that this heterogeneous growth can be characterized by indicators, such as availability and access to Internet, Facebook popularity, and factors related with population growth and gender inequality.

[1]  Ingmar Weber,et al.  Characterizing Awareness of Schizophrenia Among Facebook Users by Leveraging Facebook Advertisement Estimates , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[2]  E. Straub Understanding Technology Adoption: Theory and Future Directions for Informal Learning , 2009 .

[3]  Iyad Rahwan,et al.  Analyzing gender inequality through large-scale Facebook advertising data , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  What's Wrong with the Diffusion of Innovation Theory , 2001, Diffusing Software Products and Process Innovations.

[5]  Joshua A. Spechler,et al.  Epidemiological modeling of online social network dynamics , 2014, ArXiv.

[6]  Mohamed Ahmed,et al.  The Value of Online Users: Empirical Evaluation of the Price of Personalized Ads , 2016, 2016 11th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES).

[7]  Ingmar Weber,et al.  Online Health Monitoring using Facebook Advertisement Audience Estimates in the United States: Evaluation Study , 2018, JMIR public health and surveillance.

[8]  Pierpaolo Dondio,et al.  Predicting Stock Market Using Online Communities Raw Web Traffic , 2012, 2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.

[9]  Fabrício Benevenuto,et al.  Using Facebook Ads Audiences for Global Lifestyle Disease Surveillance: Promises and Limitations , 2017, WebSci.

[10]  Walter Willinger,et al.  Sizing up online social networks , 2010, IEEE Network.

[11]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[12]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Clustering of Population Pyramids , 2008, Informatica.

[13]  Berta Barquero,et al.  Linking Transmission with Inquiry at University Level through Study and Research Paths: the Case of Forecasting Facebook User Growth , 2018 .

[14]  Pavlin Mavrodiev,et al.  Social resilience in online communities: the autopsy of friendster , 2013, COSN '13.

[15]  Erik H. Erikson,et al.  The Life Cycle Completed , 1982 .

[16]  Balachander Krishnamurthy,et al.  Measurement and analysis of OSN ad auctions , 2014, COSN '14.

[17]  Petia Radeva,et al.  Human Activity Recognition from Accelerometer Data Using a Wearable Device , 2011, IbPRIA.

[18]  Reza Rejaie,et al.  Google+ or Google-?: dissecting the evolution of the new OSN in its first year , 2013, WWW '13.

[19]  Rubén Cuevas Rumín,et al.  FDVT: Data Valuation Tool for Facebook Users , 2017, CHI.

[20]  V. Mahajan,et al.  The 86 Percent Solution: How to Succeed in the Biggest Market Opportunity of the Next 50 Years , 2005 .

[21]  Balachander Krishnamurthy,et al.  Beyond CPM and CPC: determining the value of users on OSNs , 2014, COSN '14.

[22]  Ingmar Weber,et al.  Using Facebook ad data to track the global digital gender gap , 2018, World Development.

[23]  Yanjun Qi Random Forest for Bioinformatics , 2012 .

[24]  Roksana Boreli,et al.  How Much Is Too Much? Leveraging Ads Audience Estimation to Evaluate Public Profile Uniqueness , 2013, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[25]  Xiongfei Cao,et al.  Empirical investigation of Facebook discontinues usage intentions based on SOR paradigm , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Adoption of New Technology , 2003 .

[27]  Anja Feldmann,et al.  Tracing the birth of an OSN: social graph and profile analysis in Google+ , 2012, WebSci '12.

[28]  Rubén Cuevas Rumín,et al.  Facebook Use of Sensitive Data for Advertising in Europe , 2018, ArXiv.

[29]  Alton Yeow-Kuan Chua,et al.  Antecedents and effects of social network fatigue , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[30]  Aleksandra Korolova Privacy Violations Using Microtargeted Ads: A Case Study , 2011, J. Priv. Confidentiality.

[31]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..