Antibacterial Effect of New Bioceramic Pulp Capping Material on the Main Cariogenic Bacteria.

BACKGROUND The purpose of this research was to assess the antibacterial activity of a new bioceramic pulp capping material (endosequence root repair material [ERRM]) against the main cariogenic bacteria: Salivary mutans streptococci (MS) and lactobacilli and compare the results with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and calcium hydroxide (Dycal). MATERIALS AND METHODS The isolation of MS group bacteria and Lactobacillus (LB) spp. from stimulated saliva was performed with in-office caries risk test bacteria dip slide test. Endosequence root repair material, MTA (ProRoot MTA), and Dycal were used as pulp capping materials. Mutans Streptococci and LB were scattered on the agar dishes with a swab. The pulp capping materials under study were placed in the wells and prepared in the agar, immediately after mixing. The dishes were incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. The growth inhibition zones were recorded and compared for every material and bacterial strain. One-way analysis of variance test was done to compare the development of growth inhibition of selected bacteria against testing materials. Post hoc Tukey honest significant difference was conducted to compare each material group. RESULTS All the three selected pulp capping materials were found to inhibit the bacteria LB and MS. The antibacterial activity of ERRM and ProRoot MTA was significantly better than the Dycal. Against MS, ERRM and MTA showed no statistically significant difference. Mineral trioxide aggregate showed significantly better inhibitory activity against LB. CONCLUSION Endosequence root repair material and MTA had superior antibacterial properties against the main cariogenic bacteria: MS and LB compared with Dycal. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE A pulp-capping agent having good antibacterial properties can have better success rate in maintaining the vitality of the tooth while treating deep carious lesions in patients.

[1]  P. Pellen-Mussi,et al.  Erratum to: Spheroid model study comparing the biocompatibility of Biodentine and MTA , 2013, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[2]  B. Pellat,et al.  Effect of a Calcium-silicate-based Restorative Cement on Pulp Repair , 2012, Journal of dental research.

[3]  Y. Momoi,et al.  Clinical guidelines for treating caries in adults following a minimal intervention policy--evidence and consensus based report. , 2012, Journal of dentistry.

[4]  A. Berdal,et al.  Dentin-Pulp Complex Regeneration , 2011, Advances in dental research.

[5]  Ya Shen,et al.  Biocompatibility of two novel root repair materials. , 2011, Journal of endodontics.

[6]  B. Nyvad,et al.  The Role of Bacteria in the Caries Process , 2011, Journal of dental research.

[7]  M. Wheater,et al.  Cytotoxicity comparison of mineral trioxide aggregates and EndoSequence bioceramic root repair materials. , 2011, Journal of endodontics.

[8]  Y. Momoi,et al.  Ways of enhancing pulp preservation by stepwise excavation--a systematic review. , 2011, Journal of dentistry.

[9]  D. Ericson,et al.  Treatment of deep caries lesions in adults: randomized clinical trials comparing stepwise vs. direct complete excavation, and direct pulp capping vs. partial pulpotomy. , 2010, European journal of oral sciences.

[10]  U. Stratmann,et al.  Direct pulp capping with mineral trioxide aggregate: an immunohistologic comparison with calcium hydroxide in rodents. , 2010, Journal of endodontics.

[11]  Jin Jiang,et al.  Cytotoxicity evaluation of endosequence root repair material. , 2010, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[12]  P. Laurent,et al.  Induction of specific cell responses to a Ca(3)SiO(5)-based posterior restorative material. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[13]  H. Li,et al.  Histological evaluation of direct pulp capping with a self-etching adhesive and calcium hydroxide on human pulp tissue. , 2008, International endodontic journal.

[14]  M. Al-Omari,et al.  The radiographic outcomes of direct pulp-capping procedures performed by dental students: a retrospective study. , 2006, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[15]  J. Chavasco,et al.  In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of endodontic sealers. , 2006, Brazilian oral research.

[16]  A. Erdemir,et al.  Assessment of antibacterial activity of EndoREZ. , 2006, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[17]  S. Michalek,et al.  pH required to kill Enterococcus faecalis in vitro. , 2004, Journal of endodontics.

[18]  S. Belli,et al.  In vitro antibacterial activities of root-canal sealers by using two different methods. , 2004, Journal of endodontics.

[19]  G. Bergenholtz Factors In Pulpal Repair after Oral Exposure , 2001, Advances in dental research.

[20]  J. D. PÉcora,et al.  Antimicrobial and chemical study of MTA, Portland cement, calcium hydroxide paste, Sealapex and Dycal. , 2000, Brazilian dental journal.

[21]  J. Siqueira,et al.  In vitro evaluation of antibacterial effects of photo-cured glass ionomer liners and dentin bonding agents during setting. , 1996, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[22]  M. Torabinejad,et al.  Antibacterial effects of some root end filling materials. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.

[23]  D. Morse,et al.  The antimicrobial effect of various endodontic sealers. , 1990, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[24]  R. S. Tobias Antibacterial properties of dental restorative materials: a review. , 2007, International endodontic journal.

[25]  Stephen Cohen,et al.  Pathways of the Pulp , 1976 .