Clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease: AUA technology assessment.

PURPOSE This technology assessment addresses the optimal use of imaging in the evaluation and treatment of patients with suspected or documented ureteral stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive literature search addressing 4 guiding questions was performed for full text in English articles published between January 1990 and July 2011. The search focused on major subtopics associated with the imaging of ureteral calculi, and included specific imaging modalities used in the diagnosis and management of ureteral calculous disease such as unenhanced (noncontrast) computerized tomography, conventional radiography, ultrasound, excretory urography, magnetic resonance imaging and nuclear medicine studies. Protocols (in the form of decision tree algorithms) were developed based on this literature review and in some instances on panel opinion. The 4 questions addressed were 1) What imaging study should be performed for suspected ureteral calculous disease? 2) What information should be obtained? 3) After diagnosis of a ureteral calculus, what followup imaging should be used? 4) After treatment of a ureteral calculus, what followup imaging studies should be obtained? RESULTS Based on these protocols, noncontrast computerized tomography is recommended to establish the diagnosis in most cases, with a low energy protocol advocated if body habitus is favorable. Conventional radiography and ultrasound are endorsed for monitoring the passage of most radiopaque stones as well as for most patients undergoing stone removal. Other studies may be indicated based on imaging findings, and patient, stone and clinical factors. CONCLUSIONS The protocols generated assist the clinician in establishing the diagnosis of ureteral calculous disease, monitoring stone passage and following patients after treatment. The protocols take into account not only clinical effectiveness but also cost-effectiveness and risk/harm associated with the various imaging modalities.

[1]  F. Klein,et al.  Low-dose computed tomography for the evaluation of flank pain in the pregnant population. , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[2]  C. Kane,et al.  Time to stone passage for observed ureteral calculi: a guide for patient education. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[3]  T. Turunç,et al.  Factors affecting the success of ureteroscopy in management of ureteral stone diseases in children. , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[4]  A. Shokeir,et al.  Noncontrast computed tomography in obstructive anuria: a prospective study. , 2002, Urology.

[5]  S. Mark,et al.  Comparison of kidney‐ureter‐bladder abdominal radiography and computed tomography scout films for identifying renal calculi , 2009, BJU international.

[6]  D. Delakas,et al.  Independent predictors of failure of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones employing a second-generation lithotripter. , 2003, Journal of endourology.

[7]  M. Cutress,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of Ultra-Low Dose Contrast-Enhanced CT in Patients Presenting with Acute Ureteric Colic , 2011 .

[8]  A. C. Buck,et al.  2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. , 2007, European urology.

[9]  F. Altunrende,et al.  Is routine radiological surveillance mandatory after uncomplicated ureteroscopic stone removal? , 2008, Journal of endourology.

[10]  C. Moș,et al.  The sensitivity of transabdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of ureterolithiasis. , 2010, Medical ultrasonography.

[11]  A. El-Hefnawy,et al.  Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study. , 2009, Urology.

[12]  M. Callahan,et al.  ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) CT 2011—executive summary , 2011, Pediatric Radiology.

[13]  Kemal Sarica,et al.  2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[14]  J R Fielding,et al.  Unenhanced helical CT of ureteral stones: a replacement for excretory urography in planning treatment. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  R. Macmahon,et al.  Renal colic in pregnancy: lithiasis or physiological hydronephrosis? , 2009, Urology.

[16]  Gynecologists.  ACOG COMMITTEE OPINION , 2001, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[17]  Jeannette M. Perez-Rossello,et al.  Ultrasound versus computerized tomography for evaluating urolithiasis. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[18]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[19]  G. Stevenson,et al.  Low-dose nonenhanced helical CT of renal colic: assessment of ureteric stone detection and measurement of effective dose equivalent. , 2000, Radiology.

[20]  H. Fajkovic,et al.  Impact of stone size, location, composition, impaction, and hydronephrosis on the efficacy of holmium:YAG-laser ureterolithotripsy. , 2007, European urology.

[21]  J. Palmer,et al.  Diagnosis of pediatric urolithiasis: role of ultrasound and computerized tomography. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[22]  H. Salem.  A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi. , 2009, Urology.

[23]  J. Wolf.  Routine postoperative imaging is important after ureteroscopic stone manipulation. , 2002, International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology.

[24]  L. Kavoussi,et al.  Followup imaging after urological imaging studies: comparison of radiologist recommendation and urologist practice. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[25]  S. Tazuma,et al.  Fate of residual fragments after successful extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy , 1999, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[26]  E. Paulson,et al.  Low dose computerized tomography for detection of urolithiasis--its effectiveness in the setting of the urology clinic. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[27]  G. Ege,et al.  Can computed tomography scout radiography replace plain film in the evaluation of patients with acute urinary tract colic? , 2004, Acta radiologica.

[28]  M. El-Ghar,et al.  Diagnosis of ureteral obstruction in patients with compromised renal function: the role of noninvasive imaging modalities. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[29]  Donald L. Miller,et al.  Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures , 2012, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[30]  T. Ripollés,et al.  Suspected ureteral colic: plain film and sonography vs unenhanced helical CT. A prospective study in 66 patients , 2004, European Radiology.

[31]  Paul Nikolaidis,et al.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria® acute onset flank pain--suspicion of stone disease. , 2012, Ultrasound quarterly.

[32]  B. Matlaga,et al.  Trends in imaging use during the emergency department evaluation of flank pain. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[33]  M. Pearle,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of medical management strategies for nephrolithiasis. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[34]  S. Elwagdy,et al.  Three-dimensional ultrasound (3D US) methods in the evaluation of calcular and non-calcular ureteric obstructive uropathy , 2008, World Journal of Urology.

[35]  A. Shokeir,et al.  Renal colic in pregnant women: role of renal resistive index. , 2000, Urology.

[36]  Donald P Frush,et al.  CT with a computer-simulated dose reduction technique for detection of pediatric nephroureterolithiasis: comparison of standard and reduced radiation doses. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[37]  Bong Soo Kim,et al.  Low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography for the assessment of acute renal colic: prospective comparative study , 2005, Acta radiologica.

[38]  P. Gevenois,et al.  Low-dose unenhanced multidetector CT of patients with suspected renal colic. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[39]  C. Bugg,et al.  Follow-up functional radiographic studies are not mandatory for all patients after ureteroscopy. , 2002, Urology.

[40]  S. Cox,et al.  Symptomatic Nephrolithiasis Complicating Pregnancy , 2000, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[41]  P. Howard,et al.  Renal colic during pregnancy: a case for conservative treatment. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[42]  Hyun Cheol Kim,et al.  Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Ureteral Calculi Using Sonography as an Initial Diagnostic Tool , 2008, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[43]  R. Clayman.  Routine radiologic surveillance for obstruction is not required in asymptomatic patients after ureteroscopy. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[44]  Abdelnaser Elgamasy,et al.  Use of Doppler ultrasonography and rigid ureteroscopy for managing symptomatic ureteric stones during pregnancy , 2009, BJU international.

[45]  G. Bartsch,et al.  Value of 3‐Dimensional Transrectal/ Transvaginal Sonography in Diagnosis of Distal Ureteral Calculi , 2007, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[46]  I. Hussein,et al.  Ultrasound detection rate of childhood urolithiasis. , 1992, Annals of tropical paediatrics.

[47]  Y. Yagil,et al.  The use of standard imaging techniques and their diagnostic value in the workup of renal colic in the setting of intractable flank pain. , 1996, Urology.