Critical ventilation velocity for multi-source tunnel fires

Abstract Ventilation is an effective method for controlling smoke during a fire. The “critical ventilation velocity” u cr is defined as the minimum velocity at which smoke is prevented from spreading under longitudinal ventilation flow in tunnel fire situations. All previous studies on this topic have simulated fire scenarios in which only one fire source exists. This study conducted small-scale experiments and numerical simulations to investigate u cr for cases in which two tunnel fires occur simultaneously. The tunnel was 4 m long, 0.6 m wide and 0.6 m tall. Three cases of two variously separated fires were experimentally explored and six cases were examined numerically. Both the experimental and simulation results indicated that for two identical fires, u cr declines with separation. When the two fire sources are separate completely, u cr can be determined by considering only a single fire. When the larger fire is upstream of the smaller downstream fire, u cr also decreases with the separation. When two such fires sources are completely separate, u cr can be evaluated by considering only the larger fire. The concurrent ventilation flow and flow of downstream smoke from the larger fire are strong enough to suppress the smoke flow from the smaller fire. However, when the smaller fire is upstream of the larger fire, the decrease in u cr becomes insignificant as distance increases and the flow at u cr must overcome the flow from both fires.

[1]  Kuang-Chung Tsai,et al.  Orientation effect on cone calorimeter test results to assess fire hazard of materials. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[2]  P. H. Thomas,et al.  THE MOVEMENT OF SMOKE IN HORIZONTAL PASSAGES AGAINST AN AIR FLOW , 1968 .

[3]  C. C. Hwang,et al.  The critical ventilation velocity in tunnel fires—a computer simulation , 2005 .

[4]  Yasushi Oka,et al.  Control of smoke flow in tunnel fires , 1995 .

[5]  D. Drysdale An Introduction to Fire Dynamics , 2011 .

[6]  Dougal Drysdale,et al.  Using cone calorimeter data for the prediction of fire hazard , 2002 .

[7]  James G. Quintiere,et al.  Scaling applications in fire research , 1989 .

[8]  Haukur Ingason,et al.  The Effect of Air Velocity on Heat Release Rate and Fire Development during Fires in Tunnels , 2008 .

[9]  Kuang-Chung Tsai Influence of substrate on fire performance of wall lining materials , 2009 .

[10]  Wan Ki Chow,et al.  Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics in building services engineering , 1996 .

[11]  Teresa Rivas,et al.  Use of a laser camera scanner to highlight the surface degradation of stone samples subjected to artificial weathering , 2005 .

[12]  C. K. Chan,et al.  Numerical simulations on fire spread and smoke movement in an underground car park , 2007 .

[13]  J. Quintiere,et al.  Numerical simulation of axi-symmetric fire plumes: accuracy and limitations , 2003 .

[14]  Y. Wu,et al.  Control of smoke flow in tunnel fires using longitudinal ventilation systems - a study of the critical velocity , 2000 .

[15]  Hong Sun Ryou,et al.  An experimental study on the effect of ventilation velocity on burning rate in tunnel fires—heptane pool fire case , 2008 .

[16]  J. M. Souil,et al.  Modelling Of A Reverse Layer Of Fire-induced Smoke In A Tunnel , 1994 .

[17]  Vittorio Verda,et al.  Calculation and design of tunnel ventilation systems using a two- scale modelling Approach , 2009 .

[18]  Haukur Ingason,et al.  State of the Art of Tunnel Fire Research , 2008 .

[19]  Hong Sun Ryou,et al.  A numerical study on smoke movement in longitudinal ventilation tunnel fires for different aspect ratio , 2006 .

[20]  Naoshi Saito Experimental Study on Fire Behavior in a Wind Tunnel with a Reduced Scale Model , 1995 .

[21]  Jurij Modic,et al.  Fire simulation in road tunnels , 2003 .