Statistics of instabilities in a state space model of the human cochlea.

A state space model of the human cochlea is used to test Zweig and Shera's [(1995) "The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98(4), 2018-2047 ] multiple-reflection theory of spontaneous otoacoustic emission (SOAE) generation. The state space formulation is especially well suited to this task as the unstable frequencies of an active model can be rapidly and unambiguously determined. The cochlear model includes a human middle ear boundary and matches human enhancement, tuning, and traveling wave characteristics. Linear instabilities can arise across a wide bandwidth of frequencies in the model when the smooth spatial variation of basilar membrane impedance is perturbed, though it is believed that only unstable frequencies near the middle ear's range of greatest transmissibility are detected as SOAEs in the ear canal. The salient features of Zweig and Shera's theory are observed in this active model given several classes of perturbations in the distribution of feedback gain along the cochlea. Spatially random gain variations are used to approximate what may exist in human cochleae. The statistics of the unstable frequencies for random, spatially dense variations in gain are presented; the average spacings of adjacent unstable frequencies agree with the preferred minimum distance observed in human SOAE data.

[1]  G. Long,et al.  Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  M. J Penner,et al.  Prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in adults revisited , 1997, Hearing Research.

[3]  Hong-Yi Chang,et al.  VIBROACOUSTIC CONTROL OF PIEZOELECTRIC SMART HONEYCOMB SANDWICH PANEL , 2008 .

[4]  Dennis McFadden,et al.  On the relation between hearing sensitivity and otoacoustic emissions , 1993, Hearing Research.

[5]  W. J. Murphy,et al.  New off-line method for detecting spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in human subjects , 1993, Hearing Research.

[6]  D. D. Greenwood A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Emery M Ku,et al.  A state space model for cochlear mechanics. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  J. Guinan,et al.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  S. Neely Finite difference solution of a two-dimensional mathematical model of the cochlea. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Sunil Puria,et al.  Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: implications for otoacoustic emissions. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  E Zwicker,et al.  Interrelation of different oto-acoustic emissions. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  G Zweig,et al.  Reflection of retrograde waves within the cochlea and at the stapes. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  E. D. Boer,et al.  Mechanics of the Cochlea: Modeling Efforts , 1996 .

[14]  Hans Werner Strube,et al.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions as cochlear Bragg reflections , 1989, Hearing Research.

[15]  Renato Nobili,et al.  Otoacoustic Emissions from Residual Oscillations of the Cochlear Basilar Membrane in a Human Ear Model , 2003, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[16]  Christopher A Shera,et al.  Mammalian spontaneous otoacoustic emissions are amplitude-stabilized cochlear standing waves. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  P W van Hengel,et al.  Spatial periodicity in the cochlea: the result of interaction of spontaneous emissions? , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  E. de Boer,et al.  Spontaneous Basilar Membrane Oscillation and Otoacoustic Emission at 15 kHz in a Guinea Pig , 2004, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[19]  Hero P. Wit Statistical Properties of a Strong Spontaneous Oto-Acoustic Emission , 1986 .

[20]  L. Robles,et al.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. , 2001, Physiological reviews.

[21]  G. Zweig,et al.  The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Eberhard Zwicker,et al.  Cochlear preprocessing in analog models, in digital models and in human inner ear , 1990, Hearing Research.

[23]  S. Neely,et al.  A model for active elements in cochlear biomechanics. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Thomas Gold,et al.  Hearing. II. The Physical Basis of the Action of the Cochlea , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[25]  R Probst,et al.  A review of otoacoustic emissions. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Martin Braun Frequency spacing of multiple spontaneous otoacoustic emissions shows relation to critical bands: a large-scale cumulative study , 1997, Hearing Research.

[27]  D. T. Kemp,et al.  Evidence of mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea , 2004, Archives of oto-rhino-laryngology.

[28]  William Bialek,et al.  QUANTUM LIMITS TO OSCILLATOR STABILITY - THEORY AND EXPERIMENTS ON ACOUSTIC EMISSIONS FROM THE HUMAN EAR , 1984 .

[29]  M A Viergever,et al.  Cochlear power flux as an indicator of mechanical activity. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  A J Hudspeth,et al.  Active hair-bundle movements can amplify a hair cell's response to oscillatory mechanical stimuli. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.