Distractors slow information accumulation in simple feature search.

M. Carrasco and B. McElree (2001) presented a speed-accuracy trade-off experiment, investigating covert attention in visual search. One of the conclusions from Carrasco and McElree was that adding distractors to a single feature search does not decrease the speed with which information is accumulated about target identity. We present a reanalysis of the relevant data from Carrasco and McElree in which we demonstrate that their conclusion was incomplete and we demonstrate a processing speed advantage for single feature search displays with no distractors compared with displays with distractors. This finding is confirmed in a new speed-accuracy trade-off experiment presented here. Further, we demonstrate that increasing the display duration increases the processing speed of displays with distractors but not for displays without distractors. We discuss these results in relation to theories of visual attention and the debate between graded and fixed architecture accounts for attentional allocation.

[1]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The cost of visual filtering. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  M. Greenlee,et al.  Competition and sharing of processing resources in visual discrimination. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Hilda M. Fehd,et al.  Eye movements during multiple object tracking: Where do participants look? , 2008, Cognition.

[4]  Mark W. Greenlee,et al.  Limited-capacity mechanisms of visual discrimination , 1998, Vision Research.

[5]  J P Thomas,et al.  Bandwidths of orientation channels in human vision. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[6]  W. Ma,et al.  A detection theory account of change detection. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[7]  J. Adelman,et al.  Why additional presentations help identify a stimulus. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  J. Henderson,et al.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Independent Resources for Attentional Tracking in the Left and Right Visual Hemifields , 2005, Psychological science.

[10]  George A Alvarez,et al.  How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[11]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Grouping processes in visual search: effects with single- and combined-feature targets. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement , 2000, Vision Research.

[13]  Alex O. Holcombe,et al.  Tracking the changing features of multiple objects: Progressively poorer perceptual precision and progressively greater perceptual lag , 2008, Vision Research.

[14]  Paul M Bays,et al.  Temporal dynamics of encoding, storage, and reallocation of visual working memory. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[15]  N. Lavie Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  C. Koch,et al.  Spatial vision thresholds in the near absence of attention , 1997, Vision Research.

[18]  G. Alvarez,et al.  The number of attentional foci and their precision are dissociated in the posterior parietal cortex. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  Casimir J. H. Ludwig,et al.  Estimating the growth of internal evidence guiding perceptual decisions , 2011, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Covert attention affects the psychometric function of contrast sensitivity , 2002, Vision Research.

[21]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Attentional mechanisms in simple visual detection: a speed-accuracy trade-off analysis. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Bahador Bahrami,et al.  Modulating Attentional Load Affects Numerosity Estimation: Evidence against a Pre-Attentive Subitizing Mechanism , 2008, PloS one.

[23]  G. Alvarez,et al.  How many locations can be selected at once? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Z. Pylyshyn The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model , 1989, Cognition.

[25]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Speed of visual processing increases with eccentricity , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  An integrated theory of attention and decision making in visual signal detection. , 2009, Psychological review.

[27]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Tracking unique objects , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[29]  Bradley J Wolfgang,et al.  The attentional dynamics of masked detection. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[31]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Attention speeds processing across eccentricity: Feature and conjunction searches , 2006, Vision Research.

[32]  Paul M Bays,et al.  Dynamic Shifts of Limited Working Memory Resources in Human Vision , 2008, Science.

[33]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[34]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[35]  Thomas Geerinck,et al.  Modeling the Interactions of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Guidance in Visual Attention , 2009, WAPCV.

[36]  A V Reed,et al.  Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off in Recognition Memory , 1973, Science.

[37]  M. Carrasco Visual attention: The past 25 years , 2011, Vision Research.

[38]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Temporal performance fields: visual and attentional factors , 2004, Vision Research.

[39]  M. Grabowecky,et al.  Demand-based dynamic distribution of attention and monitoring of velocities during multiple-object tracking. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[40]  B McElree,et al.  Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  B. Dosher,et al.  External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms , 1998, Vision Research.

[42]  Claus Bundesen,et al.  Serial Attention Mechanisms in Visual Search: A Direct Behavioral Demonstration , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  A. Treisman Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[44]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects , 2004, Psychological science.

[45]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[46]  D. Kerzel,et al.  Involuntary attention with uncertainty: peripheral cues improve perception of masked letters, but may impair perception of low-contrast letters. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[47]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.

[48]  Adriane E. Seiffert,et al.  Attentional costs in multiple-object tracking , 2008, Cognition.

[49]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Perceptual discrimination in static and dynamic noise: the temporal relation between perceptual encoding and decision making. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  M. Carrasco,et al.  On the automaticity and flexibility of covert attention: a speed-accuracy trade-off analysis. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[51]  William Prinzmetal,et al.  Phenomenology of attention: I. Color, location, orientation, and spatial frequency. , 1998 .

[52]  Z. Pylyshyn Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking: I. Tracking without keeping track of object identities , 2004 .