Online joint control approach to formation flying simulation

Behavior control research is of great significance in the field of simulation. In particular, in the field of two-fighter formation flying, perfect behavior control not only can produce more graceful formation but also can benefit the strategic offensive and strategic defensive. In this article, we present a joint control approach, an online programming control and data control method that can provide better performance of behavior control than the conventional methods. The programming method controls the controlled plant by designing a group of control laws, and the data method controls the controlled plant by dynamically reading and executing the data files. We use formation flying of a lead plane and a wing plane as an example to investigate the joint control approach.

[1]  K. D. Do,et al.  Nonlinear formation control of unicycle-type mobile robots , 2007, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[2]  Domenico Prattichizzo,et al.  Discussion of paper by , 2003 .

[3]  Out-of-plane stability analysis of collinear spinning three-craft Coulomb formations , 2013 .

[4]  Boscoianu Mircea,et al.  Some aspects regarding the cooperative control problem for flying wing air vehicles , 2008 .

[5]  Bing Xiao,et al.  Adaptive fault tolerant control using integral sliding mode strategy with application to flexible spacecraft , 2013, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[6]  Wei Ren,et al.  Distributed coordination architecture for multi-robot formation control , 2008, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[7]  Gábor Bohács,et al.  Mobile robot formation control using a modified leader-follower technique , 2008, Integr. Comput. Aided Eng..

[8]  Baris Fidan,et al.  Distributed Cohesive Motion Control of Flight Vehicle Formations , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[9]  Junyong Zhai,et al.  Decentralized global output feedback stabilization for a class of uncertain nonlinear systems , 2013 .

[10]  Valmir Carneiro Barbosa,et al.  V-like Formations in Flocks of Artificial Birds , 2006, Artificial Life.

[11]  Yuhui Shi,et al.  ?Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Algorithm for Multi-UAV Formation Reconfiguration , 2013, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[12]  Qingzhong Liu,et al.  Tree Based Behavior Monitoring for Adaptive Fraud Detection , 2006, 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06).

[13]  Ramakrishnan Srikant,et al.  Fast algorithms for mining association rules , 1998, VLDB 1998.

[14]  Baris Fidan,et al.  Single-View Distance-Estimation-Based Formation Control of Robotic Swarms , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[15]  Maurizio Porfiri,et al.  Tracking and formation control of multiple autonomous agents: A two-level consensus approach , 2007, Autom..

[16]  Costas S. Xydeas,et al.  Behavior modeling using a hierarchical HMM approach , 2004, Fourth International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems (HIS'04).

[17]  Yunfei Yin,et al.  A Weighted Dynamic Information Systems Reduction Method , 2014, Intell. Autom. Soft Comput..

[18]  Sandeep Neema,et al.  A modeling language for vehicle motion control behavioral specification , 2006, SEAS '06.

[19]  Liang Han,et al.  Experimental study on fighters behaviors mining , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Shape-and-Behavior Encoded Tracking of Bee Dances , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[21]  Sanjeev Seereeram,et al.  Deep Space Formation Flying Spacecraft Path Planning , 2007, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[22]  Knut Graichen,et al.  Nonlinear model predictive control of a magnetic levitation system , 2013 .

[23]  Jan Tommy Gravdahl,et al.  Modelling of UAV formation flight using 3D potential field , 2008, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.