A comparative study of the radioprotective effects of cysteamine, WR-2721, and WR-1065 in cultured human cells.

The compounds, 2-mercaptoethylamine (cysteamine), S-2-(3-aminopropylamino)ethylphosphorothioic acid (WR-2721), and N-(2-mercaptoethyl)-1,3-diaminopropane (WR-1065) were tested for toxicity and radioprotective effect in cultured human cells using viability (reproductive death) as an indicator. WR-2721 and WR-1065 had no harmful effect at concentrations of 4 and 10 mM for periods up to 3 hr whereas cysteamine was toxic if left in contact with the cells for more than 30 min. The response of the cells to radiation was measured after a 30-min treatment with 4 mM of each protective agent. Survival curves were constructed and the following dose reduction factors (DRFs) were calculated: WR-2721, 1.3; cysteamine, 2.3; WR-1065, 2.9. Increasing the concentration of protective agent did not increase the DRF under these conditions except in the case of cysteamine. Extending the period of treatment with drug before irradiation increased the DRF for WR-2721 and WR-1065; values up to 1.8 and 3.4 were obtained with 10 mM WR-2721 and WR-1065, respectively. With these two compounds, the rate of development of protection with time is almost independent of concentration until the maximum is attained; it is probably controlled by the rate of transport across the cell membrane, in the case of WR-1065, and by

[1]  R. Scott,et al.  The effect of S-2-(3-aminopropylamino)ethylphosphorothioic acid (WR 2721) on intestinal crypt survival. II. Fission neutrons. , 1976, Radiation research.

[2]  G. A. Grant,et al.  In vitro evaluation of some latent radioprotective compounds. , 1976, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[3]  R. Scott,et al.  The effect of S-2-(3-aminopropylamino)ethylphosphorothioic acid (WR-2721) on intestinal crypt survival. I. 4 MeV x-rays. , 1975, Radiation research.

[4]  L. Smith,et al.  Some pharmacologic effects of WR-2721: their role in toxicity and radioprotection. , 1973, Radiation research.

[5]  K H Chadwick,et al.  A molecular theory of cell survival. , 1973, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  G. Kollmann,et al.  The distribution and metabolism of the radiation protective agent aminopentylaminoethylphosphorothioate in mice. , 1971, Radiation research.

[7]  T. Phillips,et al.  Radiobiolgoical and biochemical studies of thiophosphate radioprotective compounds related to cysteamine. , 1971, Radiation research.

[8]  J. Yuhas,et al.  Differential chemoprotection of normal and malignant tissues. , 1969, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  A. Vergroesen,et al.  Protection against x-irradiation by sulphdryl compounds. I. Studies on the cellular uptake under various conditions of incubation. , 1967, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[10]  O. M. Friedman,et al.  Studies on latent derivatives of aminoethanethiols as potentially selective cutoprotectants. IV. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cysteamine-S-phosphate. , 1967, Cancer research.

[11]  A. Vergroesen,et al.  Protection of tissueculture cells against ionizing radiation. I. The effect of biological amines, disulphide compounds and thiols. , 1962, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[12]  A. O. Allen,et al.  The radiation chemistry of water and aqueous solutions , 1961 .

[13]  G. Ellman,et al.  Tissue sulfhydryl groups. , 1959, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.