Background The theory has been put forward that if a null hypothesis is true, P-values should follow a Uniform distribution. This can be used to check the validity of randomisation. Method The theory was tested by simulation for two sample t tests for data from a Normal distribution and a Lognormal distribution, for two sample t tests which are not independent, and for chi-squared and Fisher’s exact test using small and using large samples. Results For the two sample t test with Normal data the distribution of P-values was very close to the Uniform. When using Lognormal data this was no longer true, and the distribution had a pronounced mode. For correlated tests, even using data from a Normal distribution, the distribution of P-values varied from simulation run to simulation run, but did not look close to Uniform in any realisation. For binary data in a small sample, only a few probabilities were possible and distribution was very uneven. With a sample of two groups of 1,000 observations, there was great unevenness in the histogram and a poor fit to the Uniform. Conclusions The notion that P-values for comparisons of groups using baseline data in randomised clinical trials should follow a Uniform distribution if the randomisation is valid has been found to be true only in the context of independent variables which follow a Normal distribution, not for Lognormal data, correlated variables, or binary data using either chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests. This should not be used as a check for valid randomisation.
[1]
Kenneth F. Schulz,et al.
The CONSORT Statement
,
1996
.
[2]
V. Berger.
Testing for baseline balance: can we finally get it right?
,
2010,
Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[3]
S. Pocock,et al.
Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practiceand problems
,
2002,
Statistics in medicine.
[4]
M. Gardner,et al.
Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing.
,
1986,
British medical journal.
[5]
C Roberts,et al.
Baseline imbalance in randomised controlled trials
,
1999,
BMJ.
[6]
A. Grant,et al.
59 Subversion of allocation in a randomised controlled trial
,
1997
.
[7]
V W Berger,et al.
Detecting selection bias in randomized clinical trials.
,
1999,
Controlled clinical trials.
[8]
D. Altman.
Comparability of Randomised Groups
,
1985
.
[9]
S. Senn.
Testing for baseline balance in clinical trials.
,
1994,
Statistics in medicine.
[10]
D. G. Altman,et al.
Randomisation and baseline comparisons in clinical trials
,
1990,
The Lancet.
[11]
D G Altman,et al.
Assessing the quality of randomization from reports of controlled trials published in obstetrics and gynecology journals.
,
1994,
JAMA.