The environmental impact of organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery through life-cycle assessment

The LCA (life-cycle assessment) was applied to evaluate EI (the environmental impact) of ORCPW (organic Rankine cycle power-plant for waste-heat-recovery) in this paper. The model of LCA on the ORCPW was established. The life-cycle of ORCPW was divided into construction, operation and decommissioning phases. The inventory of environmental emissions was listed for the ORCPW with 7 different working fluids. The GWP (global warming potential), AP (acidification potential), EP (eutrophication potential), HTP (human toxicity potential), SWP (solid waste potential) and SAP (soot and dust potential) were investigated. Some EIs of ORCPW were compared with the EIs of other power generation modes. The results show that the construction phase of ORCPW contributes mostly to the GWP and EP. GWP is the most serious EI followed by HTP among all the environmental impacts. The average pay back times of greenhouse gas discharged from ORCPW is calculated on the basis of five other power generation modes. For 7 different working fluids, it is 3–5 years for CO2, about one year for CH4 and 3–6 years for NOx. But CO cannot be paid back during the life-cycle of ORCPW according to the average pay back time.

[1]  Chao Liu,et al.  The Optimal Evaporation Temperature of Subcritical ORC Based on Second Law Efficiency for Waste Heat Recovery , 2012, Entropy.

[2]  Tzu-Chen Hung,et al.  A study of organic working fluids on system efficiency of an ORC using low-grade energy sources , 2010 .

[3]  Agostino Gambarotta,et al.  Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) bottoming with Organic Rankine Cycles (ORCs) , 2010 .

[4]  Vincent Lemort,et al.  Thermo-economic optimization of waste heat recovery Organic Rankine Cycles , 2011 .

[5]  Tao Guo,et al.  Fluids and parameters optimization for a novel cogeneration system driven by low-temperature geother , 2011 .

[6]  Naijun Zhou,et al.  Fluid selection and parametric optimization of organic Rankine cycle using low temperature waste heat , 2012 .

[7]  N. Lai,et al.  Working fluids for high-temperature organic Rankine cycles , 2007 .

[8]  Li Zhao,et al.  A comparative study of pure and zeotropic mixtures in low-temperature solar Rankine cycle , 2010 .

[9]  P. Nielsen,et al.  Chinese life cycle impact assessment factors. , 2001, Journal of environmental sciences.

[10]  K. Srinivasan,et al.  Analysis of exhaust waste heat recovery from a dual fuel low temperature combustion engine using an Organic Rankine Cycle , 2010 .

[11]  M. M. Rahman,et al.  A supercritical Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixture working fluids for the conversion of low-grade , 2011 .

[12]  Bruno Vanslambrouck,et al.  Potential of zeotropic mixtures as working fluids in organic Rankine cycles , 2012 .

[13]  Liu Chao.  Assessment on Life Cycle of Water-Cooled and Air-Cooled Ultra-Supercritical Power Generation Technology , 2012 .

[14]  W. Worek,et al.  Optimum design criteria for an Organic Rankine cycle using low-temperature geothermal heat sources , 2007 .

[15]  You-Rong Li,et al.  Influence of coupled pinch point temperature difference and evaporation temperature on performance of organic Rankine cycle , 2012 .

[16]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  Efficiency Prediction for Axial-Flow Turbines Operating with Nonconventional Fluids , 1981 .

[17]  Zhou Liang-Liang,et al.  Assessment on Whole Life Cycle of Clean Coal-fired Power Generation Technology , 2011 .

[18]  Takahisa Yamamoto,et al.  Design and testing of the Organic Rankine Cycle , 2001 .

[19]  Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez,et al.  Minimization of the LCA impact of thermodynamic cycles using a combined simulation-optimization approach , 2012 .

[20]  Jinliang Xu,et al.  The optimal evaporation temperature and working fluids for subcritical organic Rankine cycle , 2012 .

[21]  Chi-Chuan Wang,et al.  Effect of working fluids on organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery , 2004 .

[22]  E. Stefanakos,et al.  A REVIEW OF THERMODYNAMIC CYCLES AND WORKING FLUIDS FOR THE CONVERSION OF LOW-GRADE HEAT , 2010 .

[23]  Nicolas Galanis,et al.  Parametric study and optimization of a transcritical power cycle using a low temperature source , 2010 .

[24]  J. Van Roy,et al.  Parametric optimization and performance analysis of a waste heat recovery system using Organic Ranki , 2010 .

[25]  Ya-Ling He,et al.  A vapor injector-based novel regenerative organic Rankine cycle , 2011 .

[26]  Olav Bolland,et al.  Working fluids for low-temperature heat source , 2010 .

[27]  Conor J. Walsh,et al.  The environmental impact and economic feasibility of introducing an Organic Rankine Cycle to recover low grade heat during the production of metallurgical coke , 2012 .

[28]  Guo Tao,et al.  Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation , 2011 .

[29]  Minggao Ouyang,et al.  Study of working fluid selection of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for engine waste heat recovery , 2011 .

[30]  Tieyong Zuo,et al.  Life cycle inventory for electricity generation in China , 2007 .

[31]  Jiangfeng Wang,et al.  Parametric optimization and comparative study of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for low grade waste heat recovery , 2009 .

[32]  Zhen Lu,et al.  Performance analysis and optimization of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for waste heat recovery , 2007 .

[33]  Santanu Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Process integration of organic Rankine cycle , 2009 .

[34]  A. B. Little,et al.  Comparative assessment of alternative cycles for waste heat recovery and upgrade , 2011 .

[35]  Andreas Schuster,et al.  Efficiency optimization potential in supercritical Organic Rankine Cycles , 2010 .

[36]  Silvia Bargigli,et al.  Comparison of thermodynamic and environmental indexes of natural gas, syngas and hydrogen production processes , 2004 .