Integrating Quality and Lean into a Holistic Production System

Abstract Companies have for years tried to figure out how to consistently organize their business units for improving quality and efficiency and at the same time reduce costs and lead times. Toyota's production system (TPS) and its core principles have become the global benchmark. This system was developed throughout the 1950's and refined and improved to present. One of the main pillars is batch reduction – ultimately down to one-piece flow – which in turn leads to improved quality and flexibility. Quality at the source (QatS) was and still is a mantra at Toyota. However, we observe that in many firms lean and quality are frequently organized as separate and disintegrated departments and systems – often with overlapping goals. This paper reports on case studies done in three Norwegian manufacturing firms. The case studies aim to explore the relationship - or the lack thereof - between quality and lean as integrated parts of a holistic production system. Our three cases demonstrate that QatS may have something to do with maturity level of product and manufacturing technology, degree of standardization and stabilization, and the combination of explicit and tacit knowledge.

[1]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[2]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice , 1995 .

[3]  Basem El‐Haik,et al.  Simulation-based lean six-sigma and design for six-sigma , 2006 .

[4]  Eginaldo Shizuo Kamata Influence of Psychological Factors on Product Development: Lessons from Aerospace and other Industries , 2002 .

[5]  W. Bodmer Principles of Scientific Management , 1993, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[6]  Torbjørn H. Netland,et al.  Effects of a production improvement programme on global quality performance: The case of the Volvo Production System , 2014 .

[7]  Sylwia Męcfal Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[8]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[9]  Joseph Moses Juran,et al.  Quality-control handbook , 1951 .

[10]  Ulrich Jürgens,et al.  Binnenstrukturen des japanischen Produktivitätserfolges : Arbeitsbeziehungen und Leistungsregulierung in zwei japanischen Automobilunternehmen , 1995 .

[11]  W. E. Eder,et al.  Theory of Technical Systems: A Total Concept Theory for Engineering Design , 1988 .

[12]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[13]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[14]  Richard,et al.  Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .

[15]  David A. Hounshell,et al.  From the American System to Mass Production 1800–1932: The Development of Manufacturing Technology in the United States by David A. Hounshell (review) , 2023 .

[16]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  The Toyota way fieldbook : a practical guide for implementing Toyota's 4Ps , 2004 .

[17]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[18]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  The Toyota Product Development System: Integrating People, Process And Technology , 2006 .

[19]  S. Spear,et al.  Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System , 1999 .

[20]  Bengt Klefsjö,et al.  The machine that changed the world , 2008 .

[21]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[22]  Constanze Clarke,et al.  Automotive Production Systems and Standardisation: From Ford to the Case of Mercedes-Benz , 2005 .