Oral processing characteristics of solid savoury meal components, and relationship with food composition, sensory attributes and expected satiation

BACKGROUND The modern food supply is often dominated by a large variety of energy dense, softly textured foods that can be eaten quickly. Previous studies suggest that particular oral processing characteristics such as large bite size and lack of chewing activity contribute to the low satiating efficiency of these foods. To better design meals that promote greater feelings of satiation, we need an accurate picture of the oral processing characteristics of a range of solid food items that could be used to replace softer textures during a normal hot meal. AIM The primary aim of this study was to establish an accurate picture of the oral processing characteristics of a set of solid savoury meal components. The secondary aim was to determine the associations between oral processing characteristics, food composition, sensory properties, and expected satiation. METHODS In a within subjects design, 15 subjects consumed 50 g of 35 different savoury food items over 5 sessions. The 35 foods represented various staples, vegetables and protein rich foods such a meat and fish. Subjects were video-recorded during consumption and measures included observed number of bites, number of chews, number of swallows and derived measures such as chewing rate, eating rate, bite size, and oral exposure time. Subjects rated expected satiation for a standard 200 g portion of each food using a 100mm and the sensory differences between foods were quantified using descriptive analysis with a trained sensory panel. Statistical analysis focussed on the oral processing characteristics and associations between nutritional, sensory and expected satiation parameters of each food. RESULTS Average number of chews for 50 g of food varied from 27 for mashed potatoes to 488 for tortilla chips. Oral exposure time was highly correlated with the total number of chews, and varied from 27 s for canned tomatoes to 350 s for tortilla chips. Chewing rate was relatively constant with an overall average chewing rate of approximately 1 chew/s. Differences in oral processing were not correlated with any macronutrients specifically. Expected satiation was positively related to protein and the sensory attributes chewiness and saltiness. Foods that consumed in smaller bites, were chewed more and for longer and expected to impart a higher satiation. DISCUSSION This study shows a large and reliable variation in oral exposure time, number of required chews before swallowing and expected satiation across a wide variety of foods. We conclude that bite size and oral-sensory exposure time could contribute to higher satiation within a meal for equal calories.

[1]  J E Frijters,et al.  Eating behavior, personality traits and body mass in women. , 1985, Addictive behaviors.

[2]  Herbert L. Meiselman,et al.  Dimensions of the meal , 2008 .

[3]  C. Graaf,et al.  Effects of complexity and intensity on sensory specific satiety and food acceptance after repeated consumption , 2008 .

[4]  K. Teff Cephalic phase pancreatic polypeptide responses to liquid and solid stimuli in humans , 2010, Physiology & Behavior.

[5]  N. Scott-Samuel,et al.  Measuring ‘expected satiety’ in a range of common foods using a method of constant stimuli , 2008, Appetite.

[6]  B. Rolls,et al.  The Effect of Large Portion Sizes on Energy Intake Is Sustained for 11 Days , 2007, Obesity.

[7]  R. Mattes,et al.  Food Form and Portion Size Affect Postprandial Appetite Sensations and Hormonal Responses in Healthy, Nonobese, Older Adults , 2010, Obesity.

[8]  R. D. de Wijk,et al.  Both longer oral sensory exposure to and higher intensity of saltiness decrease ad libitum food intake in healthy normal-weight men. , 2011, The Journal of nutrition.

[9]  P. Smeets,et al.  Sip size of orangeade: effects on intake and sensory-specific satiation , 2009, British Journal of Nutrition.

[10]  Per Södersten,et al.  Treatment of childhood obesity by retraining eating behaviour: randomised controlled trial , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  B. Rolls The relationship between dietary energy density and energy intake , 2008, Physiology & Behavior.

[12]  N. Ryba,et al.  Common Sense about Taste: From Mammals to Insects , 2009, Cell.

[13]  D. Joanes,et al.  A Satiety Quotient: A Formulation to Assess the Satiating Effect of Food , 1997, Appetite.

[14]  Walter C Willett,et al.  Sugar-sweetened beverages, weight gain, and incidence of type 2 diabetes in young and middle-aged women. , 2004, JAMA.

[15]  Ioannis Ioakimidis,et al.  Description of chewing and food intake over the course of a meal , 2011, Physiology & Behavior.

[16]  Na Zhang,et al.  Improvement in chewing activity reduces energy intake in one meal and modulates plasma gut hormone concentrations in obese and lean young Chinese men. , 2011, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[17]  B. Rolls,et al.  Reductions in portion size and energy density of foods are additive and lead to sustained decreases in energy intake. , 2006, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[18]  C. de Graaf,et al.  Intake during repeated exposure to low- and high-energy-dense yogurts by different means of consumption. , 2010, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[19]  E. Stellar,et al.  Bite size, ingestion rate, and meal size in lean and obese women , 1993, Appetite.

[20]  M. Peyron,et al.  Physical and related sensory properties of a swallowable bolus , 2011, Physiology & Behavior.

[21]  Corby K. Martin,et al.  Slower eating rate reduces the food intake of men, but not women: implications for behavioral weight control. , 2007, Behaviour research and therapy.

[22]  F. Bellisle,et al.  The structure of meals in humans: Eating and drinking patterns in lean and obese subjects , 1981, Physiology & Behavior.

[23]  L. F. Burroughs,et al.  The role of dietary fiber in satiety, glucose, and insulin: studies with fruit and fruit juice. , 1981, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[24]  J. Le Magnen,et al.  Deprivation, paiatability and the micro-structure of meals in human subjects , 1984, Appetite.

[25]  C. Graaf,et al.  Slow food, fast food and the control of food intake , 2010, Nature Reviews Endocrinology.

[26]  David A. Levitsky,et al.  Losing weight without dieting. Use of commercial foods as meal replacements for lunch produces an extended energy deficit , 2011, Appetite.

[27]  P. Lillford,et al.  THE PERCEPTION OF FOOD TEXTURE ‐ THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE BREAKDOWN PATH , 1988 .

[28]  L. F. Burroughs,et al.  DEPLETION AND DISRUPTION OF DIETARY FIBRE EFFECTS ON SATIETY, PLASMA-GLUCOSE, AND SERUM-INSULIN , 1977, The Lancet.

[29]  Satoshi Sasaki,et al.  Eating Fast Leads to Obesity: Findings Based on Self-administered Questionnaires among Middle-aged Japanese Men and Women , 2006, Journal of epidemiology.

[30]  J. Hautvast,et al.  Nonabsorbable fat (sucrose polyester) and the regulation of energy intake and body weight. , 1996, The American journal of physiology.

[31]  B. Rolls,et al.  The effect of fruit in different forms on energy intake and satiety at a meal , 2009, Appetite.

[32]  J. Wardle,et al.  Eating rate is a heritable phenotype related to weight in children. , 2008, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[33]  C. Graaf Why liquid energy results in overconsumption. , 2011 .

[34]  R. Mattes,et al.  Liquid versus solid carbohydrate: effects on food intake and body weight , 2000, International Journal of Obesity.

[35]  M. Westerterp-Plantenga,et al.  The effect of viscosity on ad libitum food intake , 2008, International Journal of Obesity.

[36]  Bryan C. Batch,et al.  Reduction in consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages is associated with weight loss: the PREMIER trial. , 2009, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[37]  W. Willett,et al.  Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Risk of Metabolic Syndrome and Type 2 Diabetes , 2010, Diabetes Care.

[38]  Cees de Graaf,et al.  Eating rate of commonly consumed foods promotes food and energy intake , 2011, Appetite.

[39]  R. Mattes,et al.  Effects of food form on appetite and energy intake in lean and obese young adults , 2007, International Journal of Obesity.

[40]  Susan L. Johnson,et al.  Mechanisms Behind the Portion Size Effect: Visibility and Bite Size , 2011, Obesity.

[41]  L. Lissner,et al.  Weight loss on a low-fat diet: consequence of the imprecision of the control of food intake in humans. , 1991, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[42]  A. Stafleu,et al.  Beliefs about the satiating effect of bread with spread varying in macronutrient content , 1992, Appetite.

[43]  N. Katsilambros,et al.  Eating slowly increases the postprandial response of the anorexigenic gut hormones, peptide YY and glucagon-like peptide-1. , 2010, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[44]  H. Tuorila,et al.  Consumer responses to reduced and regular fat content in different products: effects of gender, involvement and health concern , 1999 .

[45]  Henri S. Tapp,et al.  Does prolonged chewing reduce food intake? Fletcherism revisited , 2011, Appetite.

[46]  M. Peyron,et al.  Clinical evaluation of mastication: validation of video versus electromyography. , 2005, Clinical nutrition.

[47]  Monica Mars,et al.  Effect of bite size and oral processing time of a semisolid food on satiation. , 2009, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[48]  J. D. Castro Physiological, environmental, and subjective determinants of food intake in humans: A meal pattern analysis , 1988, Physiology & Behavior.

[49]  S. Sasaki,et al.  Self-reported rate of eating correlates with body mass index in 18-y-old Japanese women , 2003, International Journal of Obesity.

[50]  B. Rolls Plenary Lecture 1 Dietary strategies for the prevention and treatment of obesity , 2009, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

[51]  E Stellar,et al.  Chews and swallows and the microstructure of eating. , 1985, The American journal of clinical nutrition.