The role of 3D echographic diagnostics in the choice of tactics for reconstructive plastic surgery in case of abnormalities of the development of the uterus and vagina

[1]  A. Arakelyan,et al.  Genetic factors in the development of the Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome (aplasia of the uterus and vagina) , 2020 .

[2]  D. Levine,et al.  Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME): diagnostic criteria for T‐shaped uterus , 2020, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[3]  D. Levine,et al.  Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME): better criteria for distinguishing between normal/arcuate and septate uterus? , 2018, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[4]  R. Jach,et al.  Role of morphologic characteristics of the uterine septum in the prediction and prevention of abnormal healing outcomes after hysteroscopic metroplasty , 2014, Human reproduction.

[5]  A. Di Spiezio Sardo,et al.  The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies†,‡ , 2013, Human reproduction.

[6]  A. Ludwin,et al.  Two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography and sonohysterography versus hysteroscopy with laparoscopy in the differential diagnosis of septate, bicornuate, and arcuate uteri. , 2013, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[7]  E. Barron,et al.  Three‐dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging , 2010, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[8]  A. Di Spiezio Sardo,et al.  New outpatient subclassification system for American Fertility Society Classes V and VI uterine anomalies. , 2009, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[9]  Paolo Casadio,et al.  Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomalies. , 2009, Fertility and sterility.

[10]  P. G. González,et al.  Lesión quística congénita en la pelvis: un caso de útero didelfo con doble vagina, hematocolpos y agenesia renal ipsilateral: papel de la resonancia magnética , 2009 .

[11]  A. Abuhamad,et al.  The Role of 3‐Dimensional Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Müllerian Duct Anomalies , 2008, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[12]  M. A. Pascual,et al.  Ecografía 3D/4D en ginecología: técnica y metodología , 2006 .

[13]  A. Arıcı,et al.  Anatomic factors in recurrent pregnancy loss. , 2006, Seminars in reproductive medicine.

[14]  S. Mccarthy,et al.  Mullerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. , 2004, Radiology.

[15]  F. Bonilla-musoles,et al.  Reproductive impact of congenital Müllerian anomalies. , 1997, Human reproduction.

[16]  P. Acién.  Incidence of Müllerian defects in fertile and infertile women. , 1997, Human reproduction.

[17]  D. Jurkovic,et al.  Three‐dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingography and two‐dimensional sonography , 1995, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.