Modelling the exposure of wildlife to radiation: key findings and activities of IAEA working groups

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) established the Biota Working Group (BWG) as part of its Environmental Modelling for Radiation Safety (EMRAS) programme in 2004 (http://www-ns.iaea.org/projects/emras/emras-biota-wg.htm). At that time both the IAEA and the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) were addressing environmental protection (i.e. protection of non-human biota or wildlife) within the on-going revisions to the Basic Safety Standards and Recommendations respectively. Furthermore, some countries (e.g. the USA, UK) were already conducting assessments in accordance with national guidelines. Consequently, a number of assessment frameworks/models had been or were being developed. The BWG was established recognising these developments and the need to improve Member State’s capabilities with respect to protection of the environment from ionizing radiation. The work of the BWG was continued within the IAEA’s EMRAS II programme by the Biota Modelling Group (http://wwwns. iaea.org/projects/emras/emras2/working-groups/working-group-four.asp).

[1]  M. Wood,et al.  Assessing doses to terrestrial wildlife at a radioactive waste disposal site: inter-comparison of modelling approaches. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  S Kamboj,et al.  An international model validation exercise on radionuclide transfer and doses to freshwater biota , 2010, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[3]  S Kamboj,et al.  Predicting the radiation exposure of terrestrial wildlife in the Chernobyl exclusion zone: an international comparison of approaches , 2010, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[4]  M. Wood,et al.  A new simplified allometric approach for predicting the biological half-life of radionuclides in reptiles. , 2014, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[5]  M. Wood,et al.  Findings and recommendations from an international comparison of models and approaches for the estimation of radiological exposure to non-human biota , 2009 .

[6]  K. Beaugelin-Seiller The assumption of heterogeneous or homogeneous radioactive contamination in soil/sediment: does it matter in terms of the external exposure of fauna? , 2014, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[7]  N. Beresford,et al.  Radiological dose rates to marine fish from the Fukushima Daiichi accident: the first three years across the North Pacific. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Charley Yu,et al.  An international comparison of models and approaches for the estimation of the radiological exposure of non-human biota. , 2008, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[9]  J. Horyna,et al.  Inter-comparison of absorbed dose rates for non-human biota , 2007, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[10]  M. Wood,et al.  The estimation of absorbed dose rates for non-human biota: an extended intercomparison , 2011, Radiation and environmental biophysics.