Has the butcher on the bus dyed his hair? When color changes modulate ERP correlates of familiarity and recollection

Recognition memory is usually thought of as comprising two distinct memory processes, namely familiarity and recollection. This distinction is reflected in specific event-related potential (ERP) components associated with both subprocesses. A mid-frontal attenuated negativity for correctly recognized old items relative to new ones around 400 ms has been typically linked to familiarity, whereas a parietally accentuated, more pronounced positivity for old items from 500 to 800 ms has been connected with recollection. Recently, this classification has been challenged by relating the mid-frontal old/new effect to conceptual priming mechanisms. Moreover, the perceptual sensitivity of both old/new effects is still under debate. The present study used a recognition memory task for visual objects and nonsense figures in order to investigate the functional significance of both ERP old/new effects. With respect to study presentation, all items were either presented in a perceptually identical or a color-modified version at test. Old nonsense figures, despite being meaningless, elicited a reliable mid-frontal old/new effect, thereby strongly suggesting a close relationship to familiarity processes rather than conceptual priming. Additionally, both the mid-frontal and the parietal old/new effect for real objects were graded with respect to the perceptual similarity between study and test. We argue that not only recollection, but also familiarity processes can provide information about perceptual atttributes, which is used in the course of recognition memory decisions.

[1]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Recognition memory with and without retrieval of context: An event-related potential study , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  H. Lüders,et al.  American Electroencephalographic Society Guidelines for Standard Electrode Position Nomenclature , 1991, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[3]  A. Mecklinger,et al.  Interfacing mind and brain: a neurocognitive model of recognition memory. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[4]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  Priming and recognition of novel 3D objects: Guidance from event-related potentials , 2000 .

[5]  M. Rugg,et al.  Context Effects on the Neural Correlates of Recognition Memory An Electrophysiological Study , 2001, Neuron.

[6]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  Bound in memory - insights from behavioral and neuropsychological studies , 2004, Berichte aus der Psychologie.

[7]  M. Rugg,et al.  Human recognition memory: a cognitive neuroscience perspective , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Peter Graf,et al.  Implicit Memory: It Is Prime Time@@@Implicit Memory: New Directions in Cognition, Development, and Neuropsychology , 1995 .

[9]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[10]  T. Curran.  Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[11]  I. Biederman,et al.  Size invariance in visual object priming , 1992 .

[12]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  E. Tulving,et al.  Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  J. Tanaka,et al.  An electrophysiological comparison of visual categorization and recognition memory , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[15]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[16]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  Electrophysiological Correlates of Specific Feature Binding in Remembering - Introducing a Neurocognitive Model of Human Memory , 2004 .

[17]  D. Friedman,et al.  The late negative episodic memory effect: the effect of recapitulating study details at test. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[18]  G. Mandler.  Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[19]  Tim Curran,et al.  Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. , 1994 .

[20]  Kavitha Srinivas,et al.  Specificity of Operations in Perceptual Priming , 1993 .

[21]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  Ken A Paller,et al.  The neural basis of the butcher-on-the-bus phenomenon: when a face seems familiar but is not remembered , 2004, NeuroImage.

[23]  L. Jacoby,et al.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[26]  H. Roediger.  Implicit memory in normal human subjects , 1993 .

[27]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Handbook of Neuropsychology , 1991 .

[28]  Ava J. Senkfor,et al.  Memory for words and novel visual patterns: repetition, recognition, and encoding effects in the event-related brain potential. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[29]  T. Curran,et al.  Using ERPs to dissociate recollection from familiarity in picture recognition. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[30]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Event-Related Potentials and Stimulus Repetition in Direct and Indirect Tests of Memory , 1994 .

[31]  Miller Ga,et al.  The newly founded Society for Psychophysiological Research. , 2000 .

[32]  J. Knott,et al.  Regarding the American Electroencephalographic Society guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature: a commentary on the proposal to change the 10-20 electrode designators. , 1993, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[33]  Ken A. Paller,et al.  Frontal Brain Potentials during Recognition Are Modulated by Requirements to Retrieve Perceptual Detail , 1999, Neuron.

[34]  Michael C. Doyle,et al.  Modulation of event-related potentials by the repetition of drawings of novel objects. , 1995, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[35]  Tim Curran,et al.  Differentiating amodal familiarity from modality-specific memory processes: an ERP study. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[36]  Astrid M. Schloerscheidt,et al.  The impact of change in stimulus format on the electrophysiological indices of recognition , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  Colour specificity in episodic and in perceptual object recognition with enhanced colour impact , 2003 .

[38]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  Feature binding in perceptual priming and in episodic object recognition: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[39]  Jin Fan,et al.  The sensory match effect in recognition memory: Perceptual fluency or episodic trace? , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[40]  H. Zimmer,et al.  Size and orientation of objects in explicit and implicit memory: A reversal of the dissociation between perceptual similarity and type of test , 1995, Psychological research.

[41]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Fluent Conceptual Processing and Explicit Memory for Faces Are Electrophysiologically Distinct , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Phonotactic Knowledge and Lexical-Semantic Processing in One-year-olds: Brain Responses to Words and Nonsense Words in Picture Contexts , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  A. Yonelinas.  The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[44]  T. Penney,et al.  Event related brain potentials and illusory memories: the effects of differential encoding. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[45]  M. Rugg,et al.  Retrieval processing and episodic memory , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  E L Wilding,et al.  Indexing strategic retrieval of colour information with event-related potentials. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[47]  M. Rugg,et al.  An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[48]  Todd C. Handy,et al.  Event-related potentials : a methods handbook , 2005 .

[49]  J. Pernier,et al.  ERP Manifestations of Processing Printed Words at Different Psycholinguistic Levels: Time Course and Scalp Distribution , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  A. Mecklinger,et al.  The late posterior negativity in ERP studies of episodic memory: action monitoring and retrieval of attribute conjunctions , 2003, Biological Psychology.

[51]  D Friedman,et al.  Event‐related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: A selective review , 2000, Microscopy research and technique.

[52]  Michael E. Smith.  Neurophysiological Manifestations of Recollective Experience during Recognition Memory Judgments , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  E L Wilding,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for dissociable processes contributing to recollection. , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[54]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory , 1998, Nature.