Adoption of Electronic Data Interchange by Agribusiness Organizations

Abstract This study presents new insights into the adoption of new information and communication technologies (ICTs) by agribusiness organizations and focuses on Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) and its adoption by small companies. In the last two decades there is consensus that the implementation of electronic communication throughout the supply chain has changed profoundly the way businesses operate. The adoption of EDI results in substantial cost savings, transaction efficiency as well as facilitates food supply chain management. However, the overt advantages of EDI are not sufficient to explain its current diffusion rates in food industry, which are lower than anticipated and lower than other industries. This study aimed to understand how small agribusiness enterprises perceive new information and communication technologies, and electronic data interchange in particular. A conceptual framework of the factors that associate to EDI adoption was developed based on literature survey. Case research of seven small agribusiness firms was used in order to understand the adoption of EDI. The results of multi-case research show that small agribusinesses were aware of new ICTs and three of them planned to implement EDI in the near future. The cost and the complexity associated to EDI were perceived as the most significant barriers to its implementation. Small agri-business adopted a reactive stance and external pressure, i.e., by a big customer, would initiate the adoption process. The paper concludes by providing managerial and policy implications, suggesting further research, and indicating how the research findings might be used in other contexts.

[1]  Rebecca Angeles,et al.  Revisiting the role of Internet‐EDI in the current electronic commerce scene , 2000 .

[2]  Walid Mougayar,et al.  The Business Internet and Intranets: A Manager's Guide to Key Terms and Concepts , 1998 .

[3]  G. T. Lumpkin,et al.  E-commerce strategies: Achieving sustainable competitive advantage and avoiding pitfalls , 2002 .

[4]  Gerrit K. Janssens,et al.  EDI—A strategic weapon in international trade , 1991 .

[5]  N Reekers Electronic data interchange use in German and US organizations , 1994 .

[6]  Benita Cox,et al.  Strategic use of EDI in the public sector: the HMSO case study , 1998, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[7]  M R Crum,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT OF MOTOR CARRIER ADOPTION, USE, AND SATISFACTION WITH EDI , 1996 .

[8]  Pauline Ratnasingam,et al.  Inter-organizational trust in EDI adoption: the case of Ford Motor Company and PBR Limited in Australia , 2001, Internet Res..

[9]  R. O'Callaghan,et al.  Adoption Correlates and Share Effects of Electronic Data Interchange Systems in Marketing Channels , 1992 .

[10]  Lyne Bouchard,et al.  Decision Criteria in the Adoption of EDI , 1993, ICIS.

[11]  S. Kvale Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[12]  Max S. Wortman,et al.  Dominant Factors Impacting The Development Of Business-To-Business (B2b) E-Commerce In Agriculture , 2001 .

[13]  Valerie J. Janesick The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphor, methodolatry, and meaning. , 1994 .

[14]  Gurpreet Dhillon,et al.  Interpreting the adoption and use of EDI in the Portuguese clothing and textile industry , 2000, Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur..

[15]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[16]  B. Ramaseshan,et al.  Attitudes towards use of electronic data interchange in industrial buying: some Australian evidence , 1997 .

[17]  D. Fink,et al.  Guidelines for the Successful Adoption of Information Technology in Small and Medium Enterprises , 1998 .

[18]  ScalaSteve,et al.  Advantages and disadvantages of electronic data interchange , 1993 .

[19]  Charles H. Trepper E-Commerce Strategies , 2000 .

[20]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[21]  Steve Scala,et al.  Advantages and disadvantages of electronic data interchange an industry perspective , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[22]  Paul R. Murphy,et al.  EDI benefits and barriers , 1999 .

[23]  Paul J. Hart,et al.  Power and Trust: Critical Factors in the Adoption and Use of Electronic Data Interchange , 1997 .

[24]  Pauline Ratnasingam,et al.  The influence of power on trading partner trust in electronic commerce , 2000, Internet Res..

[25]  G. Philip,et al.  Inter-organisational information systems: Are organisations in Ireland deriving strategic benefits from EDI? , 1997 .

[26]  Tridas Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Interdependent Benefits from Interorganizational Systems: Opportunities for Business Partner Reengineering , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Louis Raymond,et al.  EDI success in small and medium-sized enterprises: A field study , 1996, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[28]  S. Macdonald,et al.  Email Adoption, Diffusion, Use and Impact Within Small Firms: A Survey of UK Companies , 1998 .

[29]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[30]  E. P. Michael Strategy and the Internet. , 2001 .

[31]  Dimitris Kardaras,et al.  The development of B2C e-commerce in Greece: current situation and future potential , 2000, Internet Res..

[32]  Sunder Kekre,et al.  Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of Electronic Data Interchange , 1995, MIS Q..

[33]  M. Morton,et al.  Electronic data interchange: How much competitive advantage? , 1990 .

[34]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..

[35]  René W. Wagenaar,et al.  A comprehensive approach to assess the value of EDI , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[36]  K. Ramamurthy,et al.  Determinants and outcomes of electronic data interchange diffusion , 1995 .

[37]  Snehamay Banerjee,et al.  Electronic data interchange: Characteristics of users and nonusers , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[38]  Mary C. Jones,et al.  Towards the development of measures of perceived benefits and compatibility of EDI: a comparative assessment of competing first order factor models , 1998 .

[39]  Yolanda Polo-Redondo,et al.  International diffusion of a new tool: the case of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) in the retailing sector , 1998 .

[40]  Alan Collins,et al.  Logistics customer service: performance of Irish food exporters , 2001 .

[41]  K. Ramamurthy,et al.  Determinants of EDI adoption in the transportation industry , 1997 .

[42]  Sree Nilakanta,et al.  Implementation of Electronic Data Interchange: An Innovation Diffusion Perspective , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[43]  K. Ramamurthy,et al.  The Role of Interorganizational and Organizational Factors on the Decision Mode for Adoption of Interorganizational Systems , 1995 .

[44]  D DavisFred Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology , 1989 .

[45]  Robin T. Peterson,et al.  EDI use and participation models: from the inter‐organizational relationship perspective , 2000 .

[46]  K. Pawar,et al.  Electronic trading in the supply chain: a holistic implementation framework , 2000 .

[47]  J. H. Frey,et al.  How To Conduct Interviews by Telephone and In Person. The Survey Kit, Volume 4. , 1995 .

[48]  Paul B. Cragg,et al.  Small-Firm Computing: Motivators and Inhibitors , 1993, MIS Q..

[49]  David Targett,et al.  A taxonomy of information systems applications: the benefits' evaluation ladder , 1995 .

[50]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small businesses using a technology-organization-environment framework , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[51]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[52]  Yolanda Polo-Redondo,et al.  The influence of EDI adoption over its perceived benefits , 2004 .