Fatigue assessment: subjective peer-to-peer fatigue scoring.

INTRODUCTION Fatigue is a complex entity with contributing factors that may include insufficient sleep, circadian dysrhythmia, high workload, extended duty periods, clinical sleep pathology, psychosocial aspects, environmental factors, and many others. It can contribute to significant performance deficits and crucial safety lapses. Despite maximal implementation of accepted techniques and best practices for mitigation strategies, the deployed military rotary-wing (RW) environment must still contend with substantial fatigue-related issues among aircrew. METHODS We introduce a novel subjective peer-to-peer fatigue rating system recently demonstrated in a deployed military RW environment. Each pilot provides an anonymous weekly fatigue rating for every other pilot in the unit exclusive of self. Median and variance of the peer ratings for each pilot are recorded by the safety officer and tracked over time. RESULTS The program allows for a multidimensional external perspective on a pilot's fatigue state, relative function, and degree of coping. Scoring is predicated upon the recognition of a significant deviation from a peer's baseline that may include social and interpersonal interactions or the observation of deficits in duty performance. DISCUSSION The research basis for scientific validity and reliability regarding current peer fatigue scoring systems is exiguous. This novel approach may be of merit, particularly among military aircrew in a deployed-type setting with sustained high workload, operational stress, and limited time for supernumerary tasks. An anonymous subjective peer-to-peer fatigue scoring system is worthy of further scientific investigation, particularly warranting studies of reliability and validity.

[1]  J. Annett Subjective rating scales: science or art? , 2002, Ergonomics.

[2]  D. Dinges,et al.  Summary of the key features of seven biomathematical models of human fatigue and performance. , 2004, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[3]  M. Bertini,et al.  Sleepiness: evaluating and quantifying methods. , 2001, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[4]  Dalete Mota,et al.  Self-Report Instruments for Fatigue Assessment: A Systematic Review , 2006, Research and Theory for Nursing Practice.

[5]  Chris W. Johnson The systemic effects of fatigue on military operations , 2007 .

[6]  D. Dinges,et al.  The cumulative cost of additional wakefulness: dose-response effects on neurobehavioral functions and sleep physiology from chronic sleep restriction and total sleep deprivation. , 2003, Sleep.

[7]  Josephine Arendt,et al.  Health in a 24-h society , 2001, The Lancet.

[8]  J. Caldwell Fatigue in aviation. , 2005, Travel medicine and infectious disease.

[9]  J. Dorrian,et al.  The relationship between subjective and objective sleepiness and performance during a simulated night-shift with a nap countermeasure. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[10]  K. Gluck,et al.  An Integrative Approach to Understanding and Predicting the Consequences of Fatigue on Cognitive Performance , 2009 .

[11]  J. Caldwell,et al.  Alertness management strategies for operational contexts. , 2008, Sleep medicine reviews.

[12]  David F Neri,et al.  Fatigue countermeasures in aviation. , 2009, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[13]  Gregory Belenky,et al.  Modelling fatigue and the use of fatigue models in work settings. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  J A Caldwell,et al.  The impact of fatigue in air medical and other types of operations: a review of fatigue facts and potential countermeasures. , 2001, Air medical journal.