The Dutch adaptation web portal: seven lessons learnt from a co-production point of view

Since its release in 2014, the Knowledge Portal for Spatial Adaptation has evolved into the central web portal for climate adaptation in the Netherlands, supporting regional and local adaptation efforts. This paper reflects on how co-production shaped the development of the portal and evaluates its use and the usability of the most frequently accessed tool, the ‘Climate Adaptation Atlas’. Analysis of evaluation reports and web-statistics revealed a substantial, diverse and regularly returning group of visitors to the portal. For example, municipalities use the atlas to understand how their municipality can be impacted by climate change to support spatial planning. Using the usability criteria of fit, interplay and interaction, the analysis showed that the atlas fits the needs of creating awareness and integrating climate information with other spatial information. However, the interplay of new climate information with other currently used information varies amongst municipalities. Interactions between scientists and users were found at different stages involving different actors. Based on the development and use of the portal, seven lessons have been derived emphasising the importance of a continuous co-production process with users; a modular setup to acknowledge the diversity in approaches; encouraging users by providing showcases of adaptation initiatives and enabling exchange of information amongst users; the need for political support; the ability and will to act even in case of uncertainty; flexibility in project design to incorporate changes in user needs and the beneficial role of boundary organisations in improving mutual understanding. Through this paper, contributions to the understanding of how adaptation web portals can be developed and improved are made.

[1]  N. Reynard,et al.  Climate adaptation: Risk, uncertainty and decision-making. UKCIP Technical Report , 2003 .

[2]  David W. Cash,et al.  Countering the Loading-Dock Approach to Linking Science and Decision Making , 2006 .

[3]  C. Dieperink,et al.  Toward successful joint knowledge production for climate change adaptation: lessons from six regional projects in the Netherlands , 2014 .

[4]  Eva Lövbrand,et al.  Co-producing European climate science and policy: a cautionary note on the making of useful knowledge , 2011 .

[5]  Susan L. Cutter,et al.  The Vulnerability of Science and the Science of Vulnerability , 2003 .

[6]  David W. Cash,et al.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  E. McNie.  Delivering Climate Services: Organizational Strategies and Approaches for Producing Useful Climate-Science Information , 2012 .

[8]  T. Hoppe,et al.  Presenting a Framework to Analyze Local Climate Policy and Action in Small and Medium-Sized Cities , 2016 .

[9]  H. Goosen,et al.  Climate-Proofing Spatial Planning and Water Management Projects: An Analysis of 100 Local and Regional Projects in the Netherlands , 2014 .

[10]  Ferdinando Salata,et al.  Management optimization of the luminous flux regulation of a lighting system in road tunnels , 2016 .

[11]  Roger B. Street,et al.  Towards a leading role on climate services in Europe: A research and innovation roadmap , 2016 .

[12]  Maria Carmen Lemos,et al.  The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments , 2003 .

[13]  Scott E. Kalafatis,et al.  Overcoming barriers during the co-production of climate information for decision-making , 2015 .

[14]  F. Coenen,et al.  Integrating climate change adaptation into Dutch local policies and the role of contextual factors , 2012 .

[15]  H. Runhaar,et al.  Understanding the use of science in decision-making on cockle fisheries and gas mining in the Dutch Wadden Sea : putting the science-policy interface in a wider perspective , 2010 .

[16]  J. A. Wardekker,et al.  Uncertainty communication in environmental assessments: views from the Dutch science-policy interface , 2008 .

[17]  E. McNie.  Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature , 2007 .

[18]  D. Revel.  2015-Overview of climate change adaptation platforms in Europe , 2015 .

[19]  P. Beier,et al.  A How‐to Guide for Coproduction of Actionable Science , 2017 .

[20]  L. Dilling,et al.  Creating usable science: Opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy , 2011 .

[21]  Hens Runhaar,et al.  A method for the deliberate and deliberative selection of policy instrument mixes for climate change adaptation , 2014 .

[22]  Christine J. Kirchhoff,et al.  Narrowing the climate information usability gap , 2012 .

[23]  S. Juhola,et al.  The need for non-climate services – Empirical evidence from Finnish municipalities , 2017 .

[24]  P. Kabat,et al.  From climate research to climate compatible development: experiences and progress in the Netherlands , 2014, Regional Environmental Change.

[25]  N. Reynard,et al.  Climate adaptation: Risk, uncertainty and decision-making. UKCIP Technical Report , 2003 .

[26]  Amy Luers,et al.  Managing climate risks in California: the need to engage resource managers for successful adaptation to change , 2008 .

[28]  T. Wall,et al.  Moving Toward the Deliberate Co-Production of Climate Science Knowledge , 2015 .

[29]  M. A. M. Groot-Reichwein,et al.  Climate Adaptation Services for the Netherlands: an operational approach to support spatial adaptation planning , 2013, Regional Environmental Change.

[30]  E. Wilson.  Adapting to Climate Change at the Local Level: The Spatial Planning Response , 2006 .

[31]  R. Swart,et al.  Developing climate information portals with users : Promises and pitfalls , 2017 .

[32]  Jurian Edelenbos,et al.  Why is joint knowledge production such a problem , 2004 .

[33]  P. Driessen,et al.  Towards productive science-policy interfaces : A research agenda , 2014 .

[34]  Jan H. Kwakkel,et al.  Coping with uncertainty in climate policy making: (Mis)understanding scenario studies , 2013 .

[35]  F. Berkes,et al.  Adaptive co-management for social–ecological complexity , 2009 .