Realization of a scalable Shor algorithm

Reducing quantum overhead A quantum computer is expected to outperform its classical counterpart in certain tasks. One such task is the factorization of large integers, the technology that underpins the security of bank cards and online privacy. Using a small-scale quantum computer comprising five trapped calcium ions, Monz et al. implement a scalable version of Shor's factorization algorithm. With the function of ions being recycled and the architecture scalable, the process is more efficient than previous implementations. The approach thus provides the potential for designing a powerful quantum computer, but with fewer resources. Science, this issue p. 1068 Integer factorization is implemented in a scalable trapped-ion–based quantum computer. Certain algorithms for quantum computers are able to outperform their classical counterparts. In 1994, Peter Shor came up with a quantum algorithm that calculates the prime factors of a large number vastly more efficiently than a classical computer. For general scalability of such algorithms, hardware, quantum error correction, and the algorithmic realization itself need to be extensible. Here we present the realization of a scalable Shor algorithm, as proposed by Kitaev. We factor the number 15 by effectively employing and controlling seven qubits and four “cache qubits” and by implementing generalized arithmetic operations, known as modular multipliers. This algorithm has been realized scalably within an ion-trap quantum computer and returns the correct factors with a confidence level exceeding 99%.

[1]  Physical Review Letters 63 , 1989 .

[2]  Blatt,et al.  Laser cooling of trapped three-level ions: Designing two-level systems for sideband cooling. , 1994, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[3]  Griffiths,et al.  Semiclassical Fourier transform for quantum computation. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[4]  Barenco,et al.  Quantum networks for elementary arithmetic operations. , 1995, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[5]  K. K. Nambiar,et al.  Foundations of Computer Science , 2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[6]  C. Monroe,et al.  Experimental Issues in Coherent Quantum-State Manipulation of Trapped Atomic Ions , 1997, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[7]  Colin P. Williams Quantum Computing and Quantum Communications , 1999, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[8]  J. Ashby References and Notes , 1999 .

[9]  K. Mølmer,et al.  QUANTUM COMPUTATION WITH IONS IN THERMAL MOTION , 1998, quant-ph/9810039.

[10]  M B Plenio,et al.  Efficient factorization with a single pure qubit and logN mixed qubits. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[11]  Thomas de Quincey [C] , 2000, The Works of Thomas De Quincey, Vol. 1: Writings, 1799–1820.

[12]  J. Fowler,et al.  Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING Gaithersburg , MD June 12-13 , 2000 , 2000 .

[13]  I. Chuang,et al.  Experimental realization of Shor's quantum factoring algorithm using nuclear magnetic resonance , 2001, Nature.

[14]  C. Monroe,et al.  Architecture for a large-scale ion-trap quantum computer , 2002, Nature.

[15]  A. Karimi,et al.  Master‟s thesis , 2011 .

[16]  F. Schmidt-Kaler,et al.  Deterministic quantum teleportation with atoms , 2004, Nature.

[17]  Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues,et al.  Fuel Process. Technol. , 2005 .

[18]  R. V. Meter,et al.  Fast quantum modular exponentiation , 2004, quant-ph/0408006.

[19]  M D Barrett,et al.  Implementation of the Semiclassical Quantum Fourier Transform in a Scalable System , 2005, Science.

[20]  M. Steffen,et al.  Measurement of the Entanglement of Two Superconducting Qubits via State Tomography , 2006, Science.

[21]  B. Lanyon,et al.  Experimental demonstration of a compiled version of Shor's algorithm with quantum entanglement. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[22]  Jian-Wei Pan,et al.  Demonstration of a compiled version of Shor's quantum factoring algorithm using photonic qubits. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[23]  K. Southwell Quantum coherence , 2008, Nature.

[24]  C. F. Roos,et al.  Optimal control of entangling operations for trapped-ion quantum computing , 2008, 0809.1414.

[25]  J. Gambetta,et al.  Two-qubit state tomography using a joint dispersive readout. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[26]  A. Politi,et al.  Shor’s Quantum Factoring Algorithm on a Photonic Chip , 2009, Science.

[27]  Deborah A. Fields,et al.  Cheating in virtual worlds: transgressive designs for learning , 2009 .

[28]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[29]  Jerry Chow,et al.  Detecting highly entangled states with a joint qubit readout , 2010 .

[30]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[31]  E. Lucero,et al.  Computing prime factors with a Josephson phase qubit quantum processor , 2012, Nature Physics.

[32]  Jelena Stajic,et al.  The Future of Quantum Information Processing , 2013 .

[33]  Graeme Smith,et al.  Oversimplifying quantum factoring , 2013, Nature.

[34]  Daniel Nigg,et al.  A quantum information processor with trapped ions , 2013, 1308.3096.

[35]  X-Q Zhou,et al.  Experimental realization of Shor's quantum factoring algorithm using qubit recycling , 2011, Nature Photonics.

[36]  Revealing the topology of Hofstadter bands with ultracold bosonic atoms , 2014 .

[37]  Gorjan Alagic,et al.  #p , 2019, Quantum information & computation.

[38]  R. Sarpong,et al.  Bio-inspired synthesis of xishacorenes A, B, and C, and a new congener from fuscol† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c9sc02572c , 2019, Chemical science.

[39]  L. Christophorou Science , 2018, Emerging Dynamics: Science, Energy, Society and Values.