Stage¿Discharge Relations for Low-Gradient Tidal Streams Using Data-Driven Models

Development of stage-discharge relationships for coastal low-gradient streams is a challenging task. Such relationships are highly nonlinear, nonunique, and often exhibit multiple loops. Conventional parametric regression methods usually fail to model these relationships. Therefore, this study examines the utility of two data-driven computationally intensive modeling techniques namely, artificial neural networks and local nonparametric regression, to model such complex relationships. The results show an overall good performance of both modeling techniques. Both neural network and local regression models are able to predict and reproduce the stage-discharge multiple loops that are observed at the outlet of a 28.5 km 2 low-gradient subcatchment in southwestern Louisiana. However, the neural network model is characterized with higher prediction ability for most of the tested runoff events. In agreement with the physical characteristics of low-gradient streams, the results indicate the importance of including information about downstream and upstream water levels, in addition to water level at the prediction site.

[1]  N. Null Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. I: Preliminary Concepts , 2000 .

[2]  null null,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. II: Hydrologic Applications , 2000 .

[3]  Timothy Masters,et al.  Practical neural network recipes in C , 1993 .

[4]  Mohammad Bagher Menhaj,et al.  Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm , 1994, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[5]  Ayman Ibrahim,et al.  Hysteresis Sensitive Neural Network for Modeling Rating Curves , 1997 .

[6]  S. Jain,et al.  Radial Basis Function Neural Network for Modeling Rating Curves , 2003 .

[7]  Robert J. Abrahart,et al.  Neural network rainfall-runoff forecasting based on continuous resampling , 2003 .

[8]  W. Cleveland,et al.  Smoothing by Local Regression: Principles and Methods , 1996 .

[9]  W. Cleveland Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots , 1979 .

[10]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resource variables: a review of modelling issues and applications , 2000, Environ. Model. Softw..

[11]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  Input determination for neural network models in water resources applications. Part 1—background and methodology , 2005 .

[12]  Sharad K. Jain,et al.  Setting Up Stage-Discharge Relations Using ANN , 2000 .

[13]  E. Clothiaux,et al.  Neural Networks and Their Applications , 1994 .

[14]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  Optimal division of data for neural network models in water resources applications , 2002 .

[15]  B. Bhattacharya,et al.  Application of artificial neural network in stage-discharge relationship , 2000 .

[16]  D. Fread A dynamic model of stage-discharge relations affected by changing discharge , 1973 .

[17]  D. L. Fread,et al.  COMPUTATION OF STAGE‐DISCHARGE RELATIONSHIPS AFFECTED BY UNSTEADY FLOW , 1975 .

[18]  M. Stone Cross‐Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions , 1976 .

[19]  Charles M. Bachmann,et al.  Neural Networks and Their Applications , 1994 .

[20]  W. Härdle Applied Nonparametric Regression , 1991 .

[21]  S. Supharatid Application of a neural network model in establishing a stage–discharge relationship for a tidal river , 2003 .

[22]  Kuolin Hsu,et al.  Artificial Neural Network Modeling of the Rainfall‐Runoff Process , 1995 .

[23]  D. Legates,et al.  Evaluating the use of “goodness‐of‐fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation , 1999 .

[24]  Richard H. McCuen,et al.  Accuracy Assessment of Peak Discharge Models , 2005 .

[25]  Martin T. Hagan,et al.  Neural network design , 1995 .