Perfect simulation for marked point processes

Some recently proposed exact simulation methods are extended to the case of marked point processes. Four families of algorithms are considered: coupling from the past, the clan of ancestors technique, the Gibbs sampler, and a Metropolis-Hastings algorithm based on birth and death proposals. From a theoretical point of view, conditions are given under which the algorithms yield unbiased samples in finite time. For practical application, a C++ library for marked point processes is described. The various algorithms are tested on several models, including the Widom-Rowlinson mixture model, multi-type pairwise interaction processes, and the Candy line segment model. A simulation study is carried out in order to analyse the proposed methods in terms of speed of convergence in relation to the parameters of the model. For the range of models investigated, the clan of ancestors algorithm using the incompatibility index is the fastest method among the ones analysed, while coupling from the past is applicable to the widest range of parameter values, and usually faster than the Metropolis-Hastings sampler. The latter two methods tend to be cumbersome if the underlying model is neither attractive nor repulsive. If one is prepared to approximate by discretisation, a proper choice of Gibbs sampler makes it possible to obtain samples from models that lack monotonicity or have such a high local stability bound as to rule out coupling from the past or clan of ancestor approaches in practice.

[1]  K. K. Berthelsen,et al.  A primer on perfect simulation for spatial point processes , 2002 .

[2]  van Marie-Colette Lieshout,et al.  Markov Point Processes and Their Applications , 2000 .

[3]  Josiane Zerubia,et al.  A Gibbs Point Process for Road Extraction from Remotely Sensed Images , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[4]  J. Møller Perfect simulation of conditionally specified models , 1999 .

[5]  Giovanni Montana,et al.  Small sets and Markov transition densities , 2002 .

[6]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Nearest-Neighbour Markov Point Processes and Random Sets , 1989 .

[7]  Wilfrid S. Kendall,et al.  Perfect Simulation for the Area-Interaction Point Process , 1998 .

[8]  Adrian Baddeley,et al.  Centrum Voor Wiskunde En Informatica Probability, Networks and Algorithms Probability, Networks and Algorithms Extrapolating and Interpolating Spatial Patterns Extrapolating and Interpolating Spatial Patterns , 2022 .

[9]  Radu Stoica,et al.  The Candy model: properties and inference , 2003 .

[10]  James Allen Fill,et al.  An interruptible algorithm for perfect sampling via Markov chains , 1997, STOC '97.

[11]  E. Thönnes Perfect simulation of some point processes for the impatient user , 1999, Advances in Applied Probability.

[12]  O. Barndorff-Nielsen,et al.  Stochastic Geometry , 1999 .

[13]  J. Besag,et al.  Point process limits of lattice processes , 1982, Journal of Applied Probability.

[14]  P. Green,et al.  Exact Sampling from a Continuous State Space , 1998 .

[15]  With contributions from , 2007 .

[16]  Richard L. Tweedie,et al.  Markov Chains and Stochastic Stability , 1993, Communications and Control Engineering Series.

[17]  Aila Särkkä,et al.  Parameter Estimation for Marked Gibbs Point Processes Through the Maximum Pseudo-likelihood Method , 1996 .

[18]  Luigi Accardi,et al.  Probability Towards 2000 , 1998 .

[19]  M.N.M. vanLieshout,et al.  Extrapolating and interpolating spatial pattern , 2002 .

[20]  David Bruce Wilson,et al.  Exact sampling with coupled Markov chains and applications to statistical mechanics , 1996, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[21]  ER MOLI.,et al.  ON THE RATE OF CONVERGENCE OF SPATIAL BIRTH-AND-DEATH PROCESSES , 2004 .

[22]  Y. Ogata,et al.  Estimation of interaction potentials of spatial point patterns through the maximum likelihood procedure , 1981 .

[23]  P. Ferrari,et al.  Perfect simulation for interacting point processes, loss networks and Ising models , 1999, math/9911162.

[24]  C. Preston Spatial birth and death processes , 1975, Advances in Applied Probability.

[25]  K. Nelander,et al.  Exact sampling from anti‐monotone systems , 2008 .

[26]  C. Geyer,et al.  Simulation Procedures and Likelihood Inference for Spatial Point Processes , 1994 .

[27]  James Allen Fill,et al.  The randomness recycler: a new technique for perfect sampling , 2000, Proceedings 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[28]  D. Cox,et al.  Complex stochastic systems , 2000 .

[29]  P. Green Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination , 1995 .

[30]  Olle Häggström,et al.  Characterization results and Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms including exact simulation for some spatial point processes , 1999 .

[31]  Ingelin Steinsland,et al.  Parallel exact sampling and evaluation of Gaussian Markov random fields , 2007, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[32]  G. Roberts,et al.  Perfect slice samplers , 2001 .

[33]  O. Haggstrom,et al.  On Exact Simulation of Markov Random Fields Using Coupling from the Past , 1999 .

[34]  John S. Rowlinson,et al.  New Model for the Study of Liquid–Vapor Phase Transitions , 1970 .

[35]  B. Ripley,et al.  Markov Point Processes , 1977 .

[36]  B. Ripley Modelling Spatial Patterns , 1977 .

[37]  Jesper Møller,et al.  Spatial jump processes and perfect simulation , 2002 .

[38]  Y. Ogata,et al.  Likelihood Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns , 1984 .

[39]  James Allen Fill,et al.  Extension of Fill's perfect rejection sampling algorithm to general chains , 2000, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[40]  W. Kendall,et al.  Perfect simulation using dominating processes on ordered spaces, with application to locally stable point processes , 2000, Advances in Applied Probability.

[41]  Andrew B. Lawson,et al.  Spatial cluster modelling , 2002 .

[42]  James Allen Fill The Randomness Recycler Approach to Perfect Sampling , 2004 .

[43]  Nancy L. Garcia,et al.  Perfect simulation of spatial processes , 2000 .