Stopping speech suppresses the task-irrelevant hand

Some situations require one to quickly stop an initiated response. Recent evidence suggests that rapid stopping engages a mechanism that has diffuse effects on the motor system. For example, stopping the hand dampens the excitability of the task-irrelevant leg. However, it is unclear whether this 'global suppression' could apply across wider motor modalities. Here we tested whether stopping speech leads to suppression of the task-irrelevant hand. We used Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over the primary motor cortex with concurrent electromyography from the hand. We found that when speech was successfully stopped the motor evoked potential from the task-irrelevant hand was significantly reduced compared to when the participant failed to stop speaking, or responded on non stop signal trials, or compared to baseline. This shows that when speech is quickly stopped, there is a broad suppression across the motor system. This has implications for the neural basis of speech control and stuttering.

[1]  M Hallett,et al.  Human corticospinal excitability evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation during different reaction time paradigms. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Common neural substrates for inhibition of spoken and manual responses. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  M. Bellgrove,et al.  Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience , 2009, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[4]  V. Sturm,et al.  Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus reversibly deteriorates stuttering in advanced Parkinson’s disease , 2006, Journal of Neural Transmission.

[5]  B. Levin,et al.  On the Holm, Simes, and Hochberg multiple test procedures. , 1996, American journal of public health.

[6]  Borís Burle,et al.  Mechanisms and Dynamics of Cortical Motor Inhibition in the Stop-signal Paradigm: A TMS Study , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  E. Dietrichs,et al.  Aggravated stuttering following subthalamic deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease - two cases , 2011, BMC neurology.

[8]  A. Aron,et al.  Stop the Presses , 2008, Psychological science.

[9]  W. Byblow,et al.  Intracortical inhibition during volitional inhibition of prepared action. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Caitlin L. Oldenkamp,et al.  A Proactive Mechanism for Selective Suppression of Response Tendencies , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Jobi S. George,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals dissociable mechanisms for global versus selective corticomotor suppression underlying the stopping of action. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  H. Lüders,et al.  Localization of Cortical Function: New Information from Extraoperative Monitoring of Patients with Epilepsy , 1988, Epilepsia.

[13]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Functional organization of human supplementary motor cortex studied by electrical stimulation , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  T. Robbins,et al.  Stop-signal reaction-time task performance: role of prefrontal cortex and subthalamic nucleus. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Cortical and Subcortical Contributions to Stop Signal Response Inhibition: Role of the Subthalamic Nucleus , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  P. Alm Stuttering, emotions, and heart rate during anticipatory anxiety: a critical review. , 2004, Journal of fluency disorders.

[17]  R. T. Constable,et al.  Error-specific medial cortical and subcortical activity during the stop signal task: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study , 2008, Neuroscience.

[18]  Ian Greenhouse,et al.  Stopping a response has global or nonglobal effects on the motor system depending on preparation. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  D. Willshaw,et al.  A massively connected subthalamic nucleus leads to the generation of widespread pulses , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  G. Logan,et al.  On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  K. Watkins,et al.  Structural and functional abnormalities of the motor system in developmental stuttering. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  Nitin Tandon,et al.  Roles for the pre-supplementary motor area and the right inferior frontal gyrus in stopping action: Electrophysiological responses and functional and structural connectivity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[23]  Cyril Poupon,et al.  Microstructure of a three-way anatomical network predicts individual differences in response inhibition: A tractography study , 2012, NeuroImage.

[24]  T. Mima,et al.  Suppression of human cortico-motoneuronal excitability during the Stop-signal task , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[25]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Effect of volitional inhibition on cortical inhibitory mechanisms. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  G. Logan,et al.  Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  W. Byblow,et al.  Selective inhibition of movement. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  A. Nambu,et al.  Functional significance of the cortico–subthalamo–pallidal ‘hyperdirect’ pathway , 2002, Neuroscience Research.

[29]  P. Rossini,et al.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[30]  J. Mink THE BASAL GANGLIA: FOCUSED SELECTION AND INHIBITION OF COMPETING MOTOR PROGRAMS , 1996, Progress in Neurobiology.

[31]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Triangulating a Cognitive Control Network Using Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Functional MRI , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.