A Rigorous Analysis of the Pattern of Intron Conservation Supports the Coelomata Clade of Animals
暂无分享,去创建一个
Teresa M. Przytycka | Jie Zheng | Igor B. Rogozin | Eugene V. Koonin | E. Koonin | T. Przytycka | I. Rogozin | Jie Zheng
[1] Katharine,et al. The phylogenetic status of arthropods, as inferred from 18S rRNA sequences. , 1991, Molecular biology and evolution.
[2] Ernst Haeckel. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen , 1866 .
[3] Peer Bork,et al. Consistency of genome‐based methods in measuring Metazoan evolution , 2005, FEBS letters.
[4] N. Grishin,et al. Genome trees and the tree of life. , 2002, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[5] B. Snel,et al. Toward Automatic Reconstruction of a Highly Resolved Tree of Life , 2006, Science.
[6] D. Penny,et al. Smoke without fire: most reported cases of intron gain in nematodes instead reflect intron losses. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.
[7] M. Blaxter,et al. Evolutionary biology: Animal roots and shoots , 2005, Nature.
[8] N. Lartillot,et al. The new animal phylogeny: reliability and implications. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[9] W. Gilbert,et al. Resolution of a deep animal divergence by the pattern of intron conservation. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[10] P. Holland,et al. Rare genomic changes as a tool for phylogenetics. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[11] Hervé Philippe,et al. An empirical assessment of long-branch attraction artefacts in deep eukaryotic phylogenomics. , 2005, Systematic biology.
[12] Sean B. Carroll,et al. Hox genes in brachiopods and priapulids and protostome evolution , 1999, Nature.
[13] N. Grishin,et al. Genome trees constructed using five different approaches suggest new major bacterial clades , 2001, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[14] E. Koonin,et al. Remarkable Interkingdom Conservation of Intron Positions and Massive, Lineage-Specific Intron Loss and Gain in Eukaryotic Evolution , 2003, Current Biology.
[15] J. Mallatt,et al. Testing the new animal phylogeny: first use of combined large-subunit and small-subunit rRNA gene sequences to classify the protostomes. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.
[16] T. Gojobori,et al. Bmc Evolutionary Biology the Evolutionary Position of Nematodes , 2022 .
[17] E. Koonin,et al. Coelomata and not Ecdysozoa: evidence from genome-wide phylogenetic analysis. , 2003, Genome research.
[18] J. Boore,et al. The use of genome-level characters for phylogenetic reconstruction. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[19] Patrick Aloy,et al. Systematic searches for molecular synapomorphies in model metazoan genomes give some support for Ecdysozoa after accounting for the idiosyncrasies of Caenorhabditis elegans , 2004, Evolution & development.
[20] Ernst Haeckel,et al. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen: Allgemeine Grundzüge der organischen Formen-Wissenschaft, mechanisch begründet durch die von Charles Darwin reformierte Descendenz-Theorie. Band 1: Allgemeine Anatomie. Band 2: Allgemeine Entwicklungsgeschichte , 1866 .
[21] E. Koonin,et al. Conservation versus parallel gains in intron evolution , 2005, Nucleic acids research.
[22] E. Koonin,et al. Three distinct modes of intron dynamics in the evolution of eukaryotes. , 2007, Genome research.
[23] M. Telford. Animal Phylogeny: Back to the Coelomata? , 2004, Current Biology.
[24] Richard R. Copley,et al. Animal Phylogeny: Fatal Attraction , 2005, Current Biology.
[25] K. Peterson,et al. Animal phylogeny and the ancestry of bilaterians: inferences from morphology and 18S rDNA gene sequences , 2001, Evolution & development.
[26] M. Telford,et al. The place of phylogeny and cladistics in Evo-Devo research. , 2003, The International journal of developmental biology.
[27] Leo X. Liu,et al. Large-scale taxonomic profiling of eukaryotic model organisms: a comparison of orthologous proteins encoded by the human, fly, nematode, and yeast genomes. , 1998, Genome research.
[28] B. Snel,et al. Genome phylogeny based on gene content , 1999, Nature Genetics.
[29] Hung D. Nguyen,et al. New Maximum Likelihood Estimators for Eukaryotic Intron Evolution , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[30] Michael W. Berry,et al. An SVD-based comparison of nine whole eukaryotic genomes supports a coelomate rather than ecdysozoan lineage , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.
[31] J. Farris. Phylogenetic Analysis Under Dollo's Law , 1977 .
[32] W. Wheeler,et al. Triploblastic relationships with emphasis on the acoelomates and the position of Gnathostomulida, Cycliophora, Plathelminthes, and Chaetognatha: a combined approach of 18S rDNA sequences and morphology. , 2000, Systematic biology.
[33] J. Felsenstein. Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods will be Positively Misleading , 1978 .
[34] R. Raff,et al. Molecular phylogeny of the animal kingdom. , 1988, Science.
[35] J. Felsenstein. Inferring phylogenies from protein sequences by parsimony, distance, and likelihood methods. , 1996, Methods in enzymology.
[36] H. Philippe,et al. Archaea sister group of Bacteria? Indications from tree reconstruction artifacts in ancient phylogenies. , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.
[37] J. W. Valentine,et al. The significance of moulting in Ecdysozoan evolution , 2000, Evolution & development.
[38] J. W. Valentine,et al. Defining phyla: evolutionary pathways to metazoan body plans , 2001, Evolution & development.
[39] B. Snel,et al. Genome trees and the nature of genome evolution. , 2005, Annual review of microbiology.
[40] G. Pesole,et al. Long-branch attraction phenomenon and the impact of among-site rate variation on rodent phylogeny. , 2000, Gene.
[41] A. Wilson,et al. Ancient origin of lactalbumin from lysozyme: Analysis of DNA and amino acid sequences , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[42] Alexei Fedorov,et al. Large-scale comparison of intron positions among animal, plant, and fungal genes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[43] Victor A. Albert,et al. Parsimony, phylogeny, and genomics , 2006 .
[44] Teresa M. Przytycka,et al. An Important Connection Between Network Motifs and Parsimony Models , 2006, RECOMB.
[45] R. Raff,et al. Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals , 1997, Nature.
[46] M. Telford. The multimeric β‐thymosin found in nematodes and arthropods is not a synapomorphy of the Ecdysozoa , 2004, Evolution & development.
[47] Liran Carmel,et al. Ecdysozoan clade rejected by genome-wide analysis of rare amino acid replacements. , 2007, Molecular biology and evolution.
[48] S. Blair Hedges,et al. The origin and evolution of model organisms , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[49] M. Nei,et al. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics , 2000 .
[50] H. Philippe,et al. The new phylogeny of eukaryotes. , 2000, Current opinion in genetics & development.
[51] F. Delsuc,et al. Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[52] Hervé Philippe,et al. Phylogeny: A non-hyperthermophilic ancestor for Bacteria , 2002, Nature.
[53] J. Dopazo,et al. Genome-scale evidence of the nematode-arthropod clade , 2005, Genome Biology.
[54] M. Manuel,et al. The Comparison of β-Thymosin Homologues Among Metazoa Supports an Arthropod-Nematode Clade , 2000, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[55] H. Philippe,et al. Multigene analyses of bilaterian animals corroborate the monophyly of Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa, and Protostomia. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.
[56] J. McInerney,et al. The Opisthokonta and the Ecdysozoa may not be clades: stronger support for the grouping of plant and animal than for animal and fungi and stronger support for the Coelomata than Ecdysozoa. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.
[57] Alexei Fedorov,et al. Mystery of intron gain. , 2003, Genome research.
[58] H. Philippe,et al. Suppression of long-branch attraction artefacts in the animal phylogeny using a site-heterogeneous model , 2007, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[59] R. Raff. Understanding Evolution: The Next Step. (Book Reviews: The Shape of Life. Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form.) , 1996 .