Hybrid coronary revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease: a systematic review
暂无分享,去创建一个
C. Spadaccio | M. Chello | M. Lusini | M. Pilato | Francesco Nappi | A. Nenna | F. Spinelli | F. Stilo | S. Greco | V. Catanese | N. Montelione | F. Nappi
[1] B. Kiaii,et al. Five-Year Outcomes After Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: A Single Center Experience , 2021, Innovations.
[2] Ping Li,et al. Is hybrid coronary revascularization really beneficial in the long term? , 2021, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.
[3] J. Skupień,et al. Randomized Clinical Trial of Surgical Versus Percutaneous Versus Hybrid Multivessel Coronary Revascularization: 3 Years' Follow-Up. , 2021, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[4] A. Harky,et al. In patients with multi-vessel coronary artery diseases, does hybrid revascularization provide similar outcomes to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting? , 2021, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.
[5] G. Stone,et al. The Hybrid Coronary Approach for Optimal Revascularization: JACC Review Topic of the Week. , 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[6] A. Hiraoka,et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: useful routine option for coronary revascularization in selected cases , 2020, General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.
[7] P. Austin,et al. Long-term Outcomes Associated With Total Arterial Revascularization vs Non-Total Arterial Revascularization. , 2020, JAMA cardiology.
[8] F. S. Feitosa,et al. Late clinical outcomes of myocardial hybrid revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting for complex triple‐vessel disease: Long‐term follow‐up of the randomized MERGING clinical trial , 2020, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[9] J. Skupień,et al. Randomized Clinical Trial of Surgical vs. Percutaneous vs. Hybrid Revascularization in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Residual Myocardial Ischemia and Clinical Outcomes at One Year—Hybrid coronary REvascularization Versus Stenting or Surgery (HREVS) , 2020, Journal of interventional cardiology.
[10] H. Balkhy,et al. Residual SYNTAX Score after Advanced Hybrid Robotic Totally Endoscopic Coronary Revascularization. , 2020, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[11] C. Antoniades,et al. Preventing treatment failures in coronary artery disease: what can we learn from the biology of in-stent restenosis, vein graft failure and internal thoracic arteries? , 2020, Cardiovascular research.
[12] Jonathan D. Leff,et al. Hybrid Coronary Revascularization - Current State of the Art. , 2019, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.
[13] J. Tcheng,et al. Current landscape of hybrid revascularization: A report from the NCDR CathPCI Registry. , 2019, American heart journal.
[14] I. Modrau,et al. One-year cost-effectiveness and safety of simultaneous hybrid coronary revascularization versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2019, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.
[15] Seung‐Jung Park,et al. Completeness of Revascularization as a Determinant of Outcome: A Contemporary Review and Clinical Perspectives. , 2019, The Canadian journal of cardiology.
[16] P. Bannon,et al. Minimally invasive surgical approaches to left main and left anterior descending coronary artery revascularization are superior compared to first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents: a network meta-analysis. , 2019, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.
[17] Volkmar Falk,et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. , 2018, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.
[18] H. Balkhy,et al. Hybrid coronary revascularization: Midterm outcomes of robotic multivessel bypass and percutaneous interventions , 2019, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[19] M. Zembala,et al. Hybrid Coronary Revascularization in Selected Patients With Multivessel Disease: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes of the Prospective Randomized Pilot Study. , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[20] B. Kiaii,et al. Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. , 2018, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[21] J. Giri,et al. Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: A meta‐analysis , 2018, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[22] R. Michler,et al. A Comparison of Inflammatory Responses Between Robotically Enhanced Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Implications for Hybrid Revascularization. , 2017, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.
[23] H. Song,et al. Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft-First and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-First Approaches for 2-Stage Hybrid Coronary Revascularization , 2017, The Korean journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[24] B. Kiaii,et al. Is the Future of Coronary Arterial Revascularization a Hybrid Approach? , 2017, Innovations.
[25] C. Spadaccio,et al. Is it time to change how we think about incomplete coronary revascularization? , 2016, International journal of cardiology.
[26] P. Indraratna,et al. A systematic review on robotic coronary artery bypass graft surgery. , 2016, Annals of cardiothoracic surgery.
[27] T. Vassiliades,et al. Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass surgery with bilateral or single internal mammary artery grafts. , 2016, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[28] T. Vassiliades,et al. Hybrid Coronary Revascularization for the Treatment of Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Multicenter Observational Study. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[29] M. Ruel,et al. Minimally Invasive Multivessel Coronary Surgery and Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: Can We Routinely Achieve Less Invasive Coronary Surgery? , 2016, Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal.
[30] H. Bøtker,et al. One-year clinical and angiographic results of hybrid coronary revascularization. , 2015, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[31] Ming Yang,et al. Robotic Total Arterial Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Seven-Year Single-Center Experience and Long-Term Follow-Up of Graft Patency. , 2015, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[32] D. Hoffman,et al. CABG Versus PCI: Greater Benefit in Long-Term Outcomes With Multiple Arterial Bypass Grafting. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[33] T. Vassiliades,et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.
[34] M. Mack,et al. Validation of the SYNTAX revascularization index to quantify reasonable level of incomplete revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2015, The American journal of cardiology.
[35] Shaoyi Zheng,et al. Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery.
[36] D. Feldman,et al. Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: Present Indications and Future Perspective , 2015, Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine.
[37] K. Phan,et al. Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.
[38] A. Colombo,et al. Hybrid coronary revascularization: promising, but yet to take off. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[39] M. Zembala,et al. Hybrid revascularization for multivessel coronary artery disease. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[40] T. Vassiliades,et al. Comparison of hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients≥65 years with multivessel coronary artery disease. , 2014, The American journal of cardiology.
[41] Shih-Jung Liu,et al. Acceleration of re-endothelialization and inhibition of neointimal formation using hybrid biodegradable nanofibrous rosuvastatin-loaded stents. , 2014, Biomaterials.
[42] Sunil V. Rao,et al. Clinical outcomes after hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis of 1,190 patients. , 2014, American heart journal.
[43] B. Kiaii,et al. Single-stage hybrid coronary revascularization with long-term follow-up. , 2014, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.
[44] T. Vassiliades,et al. Clinical and angiographic results after hybrid coronary revascularization. , 2014, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[45] M. Akay,et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention and long-term mortality and morbidity in multivessel disease: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of the arterial grafting and stenting era. , 2014, JAMA internal medicine.
[46] Volkmar Falk,et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Ca , 2014, European heart journal.
[47] R. D. de Winter,et al. Status quo of hybrid coronary revascularization for multi-vessel coronary artery disease. , 2013, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[48] S. Kaul,et al. The rationale for Heart Team decision-making for patients with stable, complex coronary artery disease. , 2013, European heart journal.
[49] C. Muneretto,et al. Hybrid revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease. , 2013, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.
[50] Shengshou Hu,et al. One-stop hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease: 3-year follow-up results from a single institution. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[51] David X M Zhao,et al. Comparison of 30-day outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery verus hybrid coronary revascularization stratified by SYNTAX and euroSCORE. , 2013, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[52] G. Friedrich,et al. Hybrid coronary revascularization using robotic totally endoscopic surgery: perioperative outcomes and 5-year results. , 2012, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[53] T. Vassiliades,et al. Hybrid coronary revascularization versus off-pump coronary artery bypass for the treatment of left main coronary stenosis. , 2011, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[54] B. Griffith,et al. Hybrid coronary revascularization – techniques and outcome , 2011, European Surgery.
[55] John A McPherson,et al. Routine intraoperative completion angiography after coronary artery bypass grafting and 1-stop hybrid revascularization results from a fully integrated hybrid catheterization laboratory/operating room. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[56] Richard Tran,et al. Simultaneous hybrid coronary revascularization reduces postoperative morbidity compared with results from conventional off-pump coronary artery bypass. , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.