Hybrid coronary revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease: a systematic review

Aim: Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) for multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) integrates coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous intervention in a planned revascularization strategy. This systematic review summarizes the state of this art of this technique. Methods: Major databases searched until October 2021. Results: The available literature on HCR includes three randomized trials, ten meta-analysis and 27 retrospective studies. The greatest benefits are observed in patients with low-to-intermediate risk and less complex coronary anatomy; highly complex disease and the presence of risk factors favored conventional CABG in terms of adverse events and survival. Conclusion: HCR is an interesting approach for multivessel CAD but should not be considered a ‘one-size-fits-all’ procedure. Further studies will specify the subset of patients likely to benefit most from this hybrid approach.

[1]  B. Kiaii,et al.  Five-Year Outcomes After Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: A Single Center Experience , 2021, Innovations.

[2]  Ping Li,et al.  Is hybrid coronary revascularization really beneficial in the long term? , 2021, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[3]  J. Skupień,et al.  Randomized Clinical Trial of Surgical Versus Percutaneous Versus Hybrid Multivessel Coronary Revascularization: 3 Years' Follow-Up. , 2021, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[4]  A. Harky,et al.  In patients with multi-vessel coronary artery diseases, does hybrid revascularization provide similar outcomes to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting? , 2021, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[5]  G. Stone,et al.  The Hybrid Coronary Approach for Optimal Revascularization: JACC Review Topic of the Week. , 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  A. Hiraoka,et al.  Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: useful routine option for coronary revascularization in selected cases , 2020, General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

[7]  P. Austin,et al.  Long-term Outcomes Associated With Total Arterial Revascularization vs Non-Total Arterial Revascularization. , 2020, JAMA cardiology.

[8]  F. S. Feitosa,et al.  Late clinical outcomes of myocardial hybrid revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting for complex triple‐vessel disease: Long‐term follow‐up of the randomized MERGING clinical trial , 2020, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[9]  J. Skupień,et al.  Randomized Clinical Trial of Surgical vs. Percutaneous vs. Hybrid Revascularization in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Residual Myocardial Ischemia and Clinical Outcomes at One Year—Hybrid coronary REvascularization Versus Stenting or Surgery (HREVS) , 2020, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[10]  H. Balkhy,et al.  Residual SYNTAX Score after Advanced Hybrid Robotic Totally Endoscopic Coronary Revascularization. , 2020, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  C. Antoniades,et al.  Preventing treatment failures in coronary artery disease: what can we learn from the biology of in-stent restenosis, vein graft failure and internal thoracic arteries? , 2020, Cardiovascular research.

[12]  Jonathan D. Leff,et al.  Hybrid Coronary Revascularization - Current State of the Art. , 2019, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[13]  J. Tcheng,et al.  Current landscape of hybrid revascularization: A report from the NCDR CathPCI Registry. , 2019, American heart journal.

[14]  I. Modrau,et al.  One-year cost-effectiveness and safety of simultaneous hybrid coronary revascularization versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2019, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[15]  Seung‐Jung Park,et al.  Completeness of Revascularization as a Determinant of Outcome: A Contemporary Review and Clinical Perspectives. , 2019, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[16]  P. Bannon,et al.  Minimally invasive surgical approaches to left main and left anterior descending coronary artery revascularization are superior compared to first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents: a network meta-analysis. , 2019, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[17]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. , 2018, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[18]  H. Balkhy,et al.  Hybrid coronary revascularization: Midterm outcomes of robotic multivessel bypass and percutaneous interventions , 2019, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[19]  M. Zembala,et al.  Hybrid Coronary Revascularization in Selected Patients With Multivessel Disease: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes of the Prospective Randomized Pilot Study. , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[20]  B. Kiaii,et al.  Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. , 2018, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[21]  J. Giri,et al.  Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: A meta‐analysis , 2018, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[22]  R. Michler,et al.  A Comparison of Inflammatory Responses Between Robotically Enhanced Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Implications for Hybrid Revascularization. , 2017, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[23]  H. Song,et al.  Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft-First and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-First Approaches for 2-Stage Hybrid Coronary Revascularization , 2017, The Korean journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[24]  B. Kiaii,et al.  Is the Future of Coronary Arterial Revascularization a Hybrid Approach? , 2017, Innovations.

[25]  C. Spadaccio,et al.  Is it time to change how we think about incomplete coronary revascularization? , 2016, International journal of cardiology.

[26]  P. Indraratna,et al.  A systematic review on robotic coronary artery bypass graft surgery. , 2016, Annals of cardiothoracic surgery.

[27]  T. Vassiliades,et al.  Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass surgery with bilateral or single internal mammary artery grafts. , 2016, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[28]  T. Vassiliades,et al.  Hybrid Coronary Revascularization for the Treatment of Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Multicenter Observational Study. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  M. Ruel,et al.  Minimally Invasive Multivessel Coronary Surgery and Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: Can We Routinely Achieve Less Invasive Coronary Surgery? , 2016, Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal.

[30]  H. Bøtker,et al.  One-year clinical and angiographic results of hybrid coronary revascularization. , 2015, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[31]  Ming Yang,et al.  Robotic Total Arterial Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Seven-Year Single-Center Experience and Long-Term Follow-Up of Graft Patency. , 2015, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[32]  D. Hoffman,et al.  CABG Versus PCI: Greater Benefit in Long-Term Outcomes With Multiple Arterial Bypass Grafting. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[33]  T. Vassiliades,et al.  Comparative Effectiveness of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[34]  M. Mack,et al.  Validation of the SYNTAX revascularization index to quantify reasonable level of incomplete revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2015, The American journal of cardiology.

[35]  Shaoyi Zheng,et al.  Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery.

[36]  D. Feldman,et al.  Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: Present Indications and Future Perspective , 2015, Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[37]  K. Phan,et al.  Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[38]  A. Colombo,et al.  Hybrid coronary revascularization: promising, but yet to take off. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[39]  M. Zembala,et al.  Hybrid revascularization for multivessel coronary artery disease. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[40]  T. Vassiliades,et al.  Comparison of hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients≥65 years with multivessel coronary artery disease. , 2014, The American journal of cardiology.

[41]  Shih-Jung Liu,et al.  Acceleration of re-endothelialization and inhibition of neointimal formation using hybrid biodegradable nanofibrous rosuvastatin-loaded stents. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[42]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Clinical outcomes after hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis of 1,190 patients. , 2014, American heart journal.

[43]  B. Kiaii,et al.  Single-stage hybrid coronary revascularization with long-term follow-up. , 2014, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[44]  T. Vassiliades,et al.  Clinical and angiographic results after hybrid coronary revascularization. , 2014, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[45]  M. Akay,et al.  Coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention and long-term mortality and morbidity in multivessel disease: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of the arterial grafting and stenting era. , 2014, JAMA internal medicine.

[46]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Ca , 2014, European heart journal.

[47]  R. D. de Winter,et al.  Status quo of hybrid coronary revascularization for multi-vessel coronary artery disease. , 2013, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[48]  S. Kaul,et al.  The rationale for Heart Team decision-making for patients with stable, complex coronary artery disease. , 2013, European heart journal.

[49]  C. Muneretto,et al.  Hybrid revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease. , 2013, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[50]  Shengshou Hu,et al.  One-stop hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease: 3-year follow-up results from a single institution. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[51]  David X M Zhao,et al.  Comparison of 30-day outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery verus hybrid coronary revascularization stratified by SYNTAX and euroSCORE. , 2013, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[52]  G. Friedrich,et al.  Hybrid coronary revascularization using robotic totally endoscopic surgery: perioperative outcomes and 5-year results. , 2012, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[53]  T. Vassiliades,et al.  Hybrid coronary revascularization versus off-pump coronary artery bypass for the treatment of left main coronary stenosis. , 2011, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[54]  B. Griffith,et al.  Hybrid coronary revascularization – techniques and outcome , 2011, European Surgery.

[55]  John A McPherson,et al.  Routine intraoperative completion angiography after coronary artery bypass grafting and 1-stop hybrid revascularization results from a fully integrated hybrid catheterization laboratory/operating room. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[56]  Richard Tran,et al.  Simultaneous hybrid coronary revascularization reduces postoperative morbidity compared with results from conventional off-pump coronary artery bypass. , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.