Results of Medical Research Council Childhood Leukaemia Trial UKALL VIII (Report to the Medical Research Council on behalf of the Working Party on Leukaemia in Childhood)

Summary During the 1970s, despite apparently similar treatment, the prognosis for children with lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) improved more in some countries, notably the United States and West Germany, than in others. To find out why, the first phase of the United Kingdom (UK) Medical Research Council (MRC) childhood ALL trial, UKALL VIII, was designed to see whether similar results to the United States Children's Cancer Study Group (CCSG) could be obtained in the U.K. using an identical protocol (CCG 162). Protocol 162 was one of a series of regimens devised by the American Children's Cancer Study Group in the 1970s and was used specifically for their average risk patients (all children with ALL with an initial white cell count up to 50 × 109/l except those aged 3–6 years with white cell counts under 10 × 109/l). One arm (1A) of their study was adopted by the MRC for all children in the U.K. aged 0–14 years with confirmed ALL.

[1]  S. Richards,et al.  Blast cell vacuoles in childhood lymphoblastic leukaemia , 1988, British journal of haematology.

[2]  Testicular disease in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in childhood. Report on behalf of the Medical Research Council's Working Party on leukaemia in childhood. , 1978, British medical journal.

[3]  L. Robison,et al.  Assessment of the interrelationship of prognostic factors in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A report from Childrens Cancer Study Group , 1980 .

[4]  H. Sather Age at diagnosis in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 1986, Medical and pediatric oncology.

[5]  H. Sather,et al.  Stratification by prognostic factors in the design and analysis of clinical trials for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 1987, Haematology and blood transfusion.

[6]  H. Kay,et al.  Pneumonitis in lymphoblastic leukaemia of childhood , 1985 .

[7]  S. Richards,et al.  Medical Research Council leukaemia trial--UKALL V: an attempt to reduce the immunosuppressive effects of therapy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Report to the Council by the Working Party on Leukaemia in Childhood. , 1986, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  Look At The emerging genetics of acute lymphoblastic leukemia: clinical and biologic implications. , 1985 .

[9]  M. Pike,et al.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples. , 1977, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  S. Richards,et al.  French American British (FAB) morphological classification of childhood lymphoblastic leukaemia and its clinical importance. , 1986, Journal of clinical pathology.

[11]  A. Bleyer,et al.  Analysis of prognostic factors in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 1986, Medical and pediatric oncology.

[12]  Improvement in treatment for children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia , 1986, Indian journal of pediatrics.

[13]  Miss D. Rothwell The treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in childhood, UKALL III: the effects of added cytosine arabinoside and/or asparaginase, and a comparison of continuous or discontinuous mercaptopurine in regimens for standard risk ALL. , 1982, Medical and pediatric oncology.

[14]  S. Richards,et al.  Non-randomised study comparing toxicity of Escherichia coli and Erwinia asparaginase in children with leukaemia. , 1990, Medical and pediatric oncology.