The Socio-Technical Dynamics of Low-Carbon Transitions

Effective mitigation of climate change will require far-reaching transformations of electricity, heat, agricultural, transport and other systems. The energy studies and modelling research that so often dominates academic and policy debates provide valuable insights into these transitions, but remain constrained by their focus on rational decision-making and their neglect of non-linear dynamics and broader social processes. This review paper describes insights from a complementary socio-technical approach that addresses the interdependent social, political, cultural, and technical processes of transitions. Focusing on the ‘Multi-Level Perspective’ (MLP), transitions are conceptualized as arising from the alignment of processes within and between three analytical levels: niche-innovations, socio-technical regimes and the socio-technical landscape. This analytical framework is illustrated with a case study of the German electricity transition and used to appraise low-carbon transitions in several other sectors. We end by articulating four lessons for managing low-carbon transitions.

[1]  Jens Newig,et al.  Steering for Sustainable Development: a Typology of Problems and Strategies with respect to Ambivalence, Uncertainty and Distributed Power , 2007 .

[2]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology , 2006 .

[3]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The politics and economics of constructing, contesting and restricting socio-political space for renewables - the German Renewable Energy Act , 2016 .

[4]  Catherine Mitchell,et al.  Historical institutionalism and the politics of sustainable energy transitions: A research agenda , 2017 .

[5]  Barack Obama,et al.  The irreversible momentum of clean energy , 2017, Science.

[6]  Mario Neukirch.  Die internationale Pionierphase der Windenergienutzung , 2010 .

[7]  Michael Pahle,et al.  Germany's dash for coal: exploring drivers and factors , 2010 .

[8]  M. Pantzar,et al.  Sustainable practices : social theory and climate change , 2013 .

[9]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Key indicators to track current progress and future ambition of the Paris Agreement , 2017 .

[10]  J. Zysman,et al.  Winning coalitions for climate policy , 2015, Science.

[11]  Karoline S. Rogge,et al.  Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis , 2016 .

[12]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization , 2007 .

[13]  J. Meadowcroft.  What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions , 2009 .

[14]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Implementing the Behavioral Wedge: Designing and Adopting Effective Carbon Emissions Reduction Programs , 2010 .

[15]  A. J. Meltsner,et al.  Political Feasibility and Policy Analysis , 1972 .

[16]  J. Pykett,et al.  Governing temptation: Changing behaviour in an age of libertarian paternalism , 2011 .

[17]  Jesse D. Jenkins,et al.  A critical review of global decarbonization scenarios: what do they tell us about feasibility? , 2015 .

[18]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources , 2012 .

[19]  Markus Hesse,et al.  Experimenting for Sustainable Transport. The approach of Strategic Niche Management , 2005 .

[20]  Sandra Wassermann,et al.  Current challenges of Germany’s energy transition project and competing strategies of challengers and incumbents: The case of direct marketing of electricity from renewable energy sources , 2015 .

[21]  L. Hermwille.  The role of narratives in socio-technical transitions—Fukushima and the energy regimes of Japan, Germany, and the United Kingdom , 2016 .

[22]  K. Neuhoff,et al.  CO2 cost pass-through and windfall profits in the power sector , 2006 .

[23]  R. Howarth,et al.  Limitations of integrated assessment models of climate change , 2009 .

[24]  B. Sovacool.  Energy policymaking in Denmark: Implications for global energy security and sustainability , 2013 .

[25]  D. Gibbs,et al.  Towards a sustainable economy? Socio-technical transitions in the green building sector , 2014 .

[26]  F. Geels.  The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms , 2011 .

[27]  L. Ryan,et al.  Spreading the Net: The Multiple Benefits of Energy Efficiency Improvements , 2012 .

[28]  J. Voss,et al.  Editorial: Governance for Sustainable Development in the Face of Ambivalence, Uncertainty and Distributed Power: an Introduction , 2007 .

[29]  S Pacala,et al.  Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies , 2004, Science.

[30]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  Bridging analytical approaches for low-carbon transitions , 2016 .

[31]  B. Truffer,et al.  Market Formation in Technological Innovation Systems—Diffusion of Photovoltaic Applications in Germany , 2011 .

[32]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions , 2005 .

[33]  F. Geels,et al.  Sequence and alignment of external pressures in industry destabilisation: Understanding the downfall of incumbent utilities in the German energy transition (1998–2015) , 2017 .

[34]  Manuel Frondel,et al.  The burden of Germany’s energy transition: An empirical analysis of distributional effects , 2015 .

[35]  Karoline S. Rogge,et al.  Green change: renewable energies, policy mix and innovation , 2015 .

[36]  S. Sorrell,et al.  Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization , 2017, Science.

[37]  Baoping Shang,et al.  How Large are Global Energy Subsidies? , 2015, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[38]  M. Dietrich.  Historical Institutionalism and the Politics of a Knowledge Economy , 2017 .

[39]  J. Schot,et al.  Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation : the approach of strategic niche management , 1998 .

[40]  Paula Kivimaa,et al.  Creative Destruction or Mere Niche Creation? Innovation Policy Mixes for Sustainability Transitions , 2015 .

[41]  Florian Kerna,et al.  Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions , 2015 .

[42]  D. Victor.  Climate change: Embed the social sciences in climate policy , 2015, Nature.

[43]  R. Silverstone,et al.  Consuming technologies : media and information in domestic spaces , 1993 .

[44]  C. Lindblom.  Still Muddling, Not Yet Through. , 1979 .

[45]  Knut H. Sørensen,et al.  Making Technology Our Own?: Domesticating Technology Into Everyday Life , 1996 .

[46]  G. Peters,et al.  The trouble with negative emissions , 2016, Science.

[47]  F. Geels.  From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[48]  Karen C. Seto,et al.  Beyond Technology: Demand-Side Solutions for Climate Change Mitigation , 2016 .

[49]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  The importance of comprehensiveness in renewable electricity and energy-efficiency policy , 2009 .

[50]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Moving beyond alternative fuel hype to decarbonize transportation , 2016, Nature Energy.

[51]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[52]  A. Giddens.  The Politics of Climate Change , 2009 .

[53]  D. M. Powell,et al.  Assessing the drivers of regional trends in solar photovoltaic manufacturing , 2013 .

[54]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Diversity: Energy studies need social science , 2014, Nature.

[55]  E. Shove,et al.  Sustainable practices:social theory and climate change , 2013 .

[56]  F. Geels,et al.  The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014) , 2016 .

[57]  Danièle Revel.  Marginalization of end-use technologies in energy innovation for climate protection , 2013 .

[58]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Contestation, contingency, and justice in the Nordic low-carbon energy transition , 2017, Energy Policy.

[59]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930) , 2005, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[60]  B. Girod,et al.  Compulsive policy-making—The evolution of the German feed-in tariff system for solar photovoltaic power , 2014 .

[61]  F. Geels,et al.  Eco-innovation and retailers in milk, beef and bread chains: enriching environmental supply chain management with insights from innovation studies , 2015 .

[62]  Johan Schot,et al.  The roles of users in shaping transitions to new energy systems , 2016, Nature Energy.

[63]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies , 2012 .

[64]  F. Geels.  Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective , 2014 .

[65]  M. Fay,et al.  Green Industrial Policies: When and How , 2013 .

[66]  Peter J. G. Pearson,et al.  A low carbon industrial revolution? Insights and challenges from past technological and economic transformations , 2012 .

[67]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[68]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Reviewing, Reforming, and Rethinking Global Energy Subsidies: Towards a Political Economy Research Agenda , 2017 .