Performance of buried HDPE pipes – part I: peaking deflection during initial backfilling process

Peaking deflection caused by compacting the sidefill, referred to as the maximum change of the pipe diameter divided by the undeformed diameter, is an important parameter in the design and safety check of buried pipelines. However, quantitative equations on the deflection useful for engineering practice are very limited. In this paper, a two-dimensional finite element analysis is used to investigate the peaking deflection of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipes. In the analyses, the pipe–soil interaction is rationally modeled. A field trial is conducted and the finite-element modeling is evaluated by using the data measured in the field test. Parametric studies are also conducted to investigate the effects of pipe diameter, pipe stiffness, soil modulus, trench width, and compactor type on the peaking deflection of buried HDPE pipes. A new estimating tool is developed that considers the major influencing factors: pipe diameter, pipe stiffness, soil modulus, and compactor type (vibratory plate or rammer) ...

[1]  Thomas D. O'Rourke,et al.  Shear Strength Characteristics of Sand‐Polymer Interfaces , 1990 .

[2]  Min Zhou,et al.  Experimental Study of the Effects Produced by a Backfilling Process on Full-Scale Buried Corrugated HDPE Pipes in Fine-Grained Soils , 2016 .

[3]  T J McGrath REPLACING E' WITH THE CONSTRAINED MODULUS IN FLEXIBLE PIPE DESIGN , 1998 .

[4]  Plaxis Bulletin,et al.  PLAXIS FINITE ELEMENT CODE FOR SOIL AND ROCK ANALYSES , 2005 .

[5]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  Short-Term Strain and Deformation Behavior of Geosynthetic Walls at Working Stress Conditions , 2002 .

[6]  Timothy J. McGrath,et al.  RECOMMENDED SPECIFICATIONS FOR LARGE-SPAN CULVERTS , 2002 .

[7]  Paul R. Fleming,et al.  Laboratory and Field Testing of Large-Diameter Plastic Pipe , 1997 .

[8]  Jie Han,et al.  Design Method for Geogrid-Reinforced Unpaved Roads. I. Development of Design Method , 2004 .

[9]  M. Arockiasamy,et al.  Full-Scale Field Tests on Flexible Pipes under Live Load Application , 2006 .

[10]  M.S.A. Siddiquee,et al.  A novel viscoplastic model of high-density polyethylene pipe material , 2015 .

[11]  Raju Acharya Improved Load Distribution for Load Rating of Low-Fill Box Structures , 2012 .

[12]  Shad M. Sargand,et al.  Soil Pressure Measured at Various Fill Heights Above Deeply Buried Thermoplastic Pipe , 2001 .

[13]  Hisham T. Eid,et al.  Macro-scale direct shear test device for assessing soil-solid interface friction under low effective normal stresses , 2014 .

[14]  Timothy J. McGrath,et al.  PIPE INTERACTION WITH THE BACKFILL ENVELOPE , 1999 .

[15]  Timothy J. McGrath,et al.  Two-Dimensional Analyses of Thermoplastic Culvert Deformations and Strains , 2004 .

[16]  Ian D. Moore,et al.  Finite Element Modelling of Inelastic Deformation of Ductile Polymers , 1997 .

[17]  Jie Han,et al.  Laboratory evaluation of installation of a steel-reinforced high-density polyethylene pipe in soil , 2015 .

[18]  Ian D. Moore,et al.  Compaction effects on strains within profiled thermoplastic pipes , 2008 .

[19]  Shad M. Sargand,et al.  Peaking Deflections of Flexible Pipe during Initial Backfilling Process , 2007 .

[20]  Shui-Long Shen,et al.  Evaluation of land subsidence by considering underground structures that penetrate the aquifers of Shanghai, China , 2012, Hydrogeology Journal.

[21]  Fei Wang,et al.  Performance of buried HDPE pipes – part II: total deflection of the pipe , 2017 .

[22]  Ian D. Moore,et al.  Modeling the Effects of Backfilling and Soil Compaction beside Shallow Buried Pipes , 2013 .

[23]  Shad M. Sargand,et al.  Use of Soil Stiffness Gauge in Thermoplastic Pipe Installation , 2004 .

[24]  J N Kay,et al.  STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF PIPE CULVERTS , 1971 .

[25]  M. Bolton THE STRENGTH AND DILATANCY OF SANDS , 1986 .

[26]  James D. Hartley,et al.  E' and Its Variation With Depth , 1987 .

[27]  Jie Han,et al.  Laboratory Study on Geosynthetic Protection of Buried Steel-Reinforced HDPE Pipes from Static Loading , 2014 .

[28]  S. Shen,et al.  Ground Response to Multiple Parallel Microtunneling Operations in Cemented Silty Clay and Sand , 2016 .

[29]  Fei Wang,et al.  Establishing a Design Procedure for Buried Steel-Reinforced High-Density Polyethylene Pipes: A Field Study , 2015 .

[30]  Malcolm D. Bolton,et al.  Influences on Pipeline Interface Friction Measured in Direct Shear Tests , 2014 .

[31]  Shad M. Sargand,et al.  Field Verification of Structural Performance of Thermoplastic Pipe Under Deep Backfill Conditions , 2002 .

[32]  S. Shen,et al.  Interpretation of increased deformation rate in aquifer IV due to groundwater pumping in Shanghai , 2013 .

[33]  S. Shen,et al.  Evaluation of hydraulic conductivity for both marine and deltaic deposits based on piezocone testing , 2015 .

[34]  A. F. Witthoeft,et al.  Numerical investigation of earth pressure reduction on buried pipes using EPS geofoam compressible inclusions , 2016 .

[35]  A Howard,et al.  Latvia Field Test of 915-mm Fiberglass Pipe , 1994 .

[36]  S. Shen,et al.  Numerical evaluation of land subsidence induced by groundwater pumping in Shanghai , 2011 .

[37]  Ian D. Moore,et al.  Finite Element Study of Stability of Corroded Metal Culverts , 2008 .

[38]  Ian D. Moore,et al.  Metal Culvert Response to Earth Loading: Performance of Two-Dimensional Analysis , 1999 .

[39]  PengPeng Ni Nonlinear soil-structure interaction for buried pressure pipes under differential ground motion , 2016 .