Incorporating Experimental Information in the Total Monte Carlo Methodology Using File Weights

Some criticism has been directed towards the Total Monte Carlo method because experimental information has not been taken into account in a statistically well-founded manner. In this work, a Bayesian calibration method is implemented by assigning weights to the random nuclear data files and the method is illustratively applied to a few applications. In some considered cases, the estimated nuclear data uncertainties are significantly reduced and the central values are significantly shifted. The study suggests that the method can be applied both to estimate uncertainties in a more justified way and in the search for better central values. Some improvements are however necessary; for example, the treatment of outliers and cross-experimental correlations should be more rigorous and random files that are intended to be prior files should be generated.

[1]  A.J.M. Plompen,et al.  Experimental Uncertainty and Covariance Information in EXFOR Library , 2012 .

[2]  P. F. Rose,et al.  ENDF-201: ENDF/B-VI summary documentation , 1991 .

[3]  Michael E. Rising,et al.  Quantification and propagation of nuclear data uncertainties , 2013 .

[4]  E. Alhassan,et al.  Propagation of nuclear data uncertainties for ELECTRA burn-up calculations , 2013, 1304.1701.

[5]  D. Neudecker,et al.  Consistent Procedure for Nuclear Data Evaluation Based on Modeling , 2008 .

[6]  B. Pritychenko,et al.  Towards a More Complete and Accurate Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data Library (EXFOR): International Collaboration Between Nuclear Reaction Data Centres (NRDC) , 2014, 2002.07114.

[7]  Roberto Capote,et al.  A New Formulation of the Unified Monte Carlo Approach (UMC-B) and Cross-Section Evaluation for the Dosimetry Reaction 55 Mn(n,γ) 56 Mn , 2012 .

[8]  R. Simes,et al.  An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance , 1986 .

[9]  D. Smith.  A unified Monte Carlo approach to fast neutron cross section data evaluation. , 2008 .

[10]  Janne Wallenius,et al.  ELECTRA: European Lead-Cooled Training Reactor , 2012 .

[11]  S Pomp,et al.  Total Monte Carlo evaluation for dose calculations. , 2014, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[12]  Petter Helgesson,et al.  UO2 versus MOX: Propagated Nuclear Data Uncertainty for keff, with Burnup , 2014 .

[13]  Arjan J. Koning,et al.  Towards sustainable nuclear energy: Putting nuclear physics to work , 2008 .

[14]  Arjan J. Koning,et al.  Modern Nuclear Data Evaluation with the TALYS Code System , 2012 .

[15]  Petter Helgesson,et al.  Efficient Use of Monte Carlo: Uncertainty Propagation , 2014 .

[16]  Petter Helgesson,et al.  Uncertainty and correlation analysis of lead nuclear data on reactor parameters for the European Lead Cooled Training Reactor , 2015 .

[17]  V. Zerkin.  Web Tool for Constructing a Covariance Matrix from EXFOR Uncertainties , 2012 .

[18]  E. Bauge,et al.  Evaluation of the Covariance Matrix of 239Pu Neutronic Cross Sections in the Continuum Using the Backward-Forward Monte-Carlo Method , 2011 .