Trace-elements in sulfides of the Dergamysh cobalt-bearing massive sulfide deposit, the Southern Urals: Mode of occurrence and matter sources

Subject of study. The article presents the results of study of trace elements (TEs) in sulfides of the main ore body (borehole 1T) and the northwestern ore body (borehole 200) of the Dergamysh cobalt-bearing massive sulfide deposit hosted in serpentinites (South Urals). Materials and methods. The chalcopyrite-pyrite-marcasite sandstones of the main ore body and pyrite-chalcopyrite-pyrrhotite “gravelites” of its northwestern satellite were studied with laser ablation with inductively coupled plasma. Results. The TE contents, distribution and mode of occurrence differ in sulfides of the main ore body and its northwestern satellite. In ores of the main ore body, most TEs (Ag, Sn, Mn, As, Co, Ni, Te, Pb, Au) accumulate in pyrite-1, pyrite-marcasite aggregates concentrate Tl and Bi, marcasite is a host to Mo and Sb, and chalcopyrite contains Zn, Se and Cd. Pyrite-2 is depleted in TEs relative to other sulfides. In sulfides of the northwestern satellite, most TEs are related to chalcopyrite (Bi, Te, Zn, Cd, Se, Pb, Au, Tl, Ni, Co). Tin accumulates in cubanite, As and Ni are hosted in pyrite-4, Ag, Mn and Mo are concentrated in pyrrhotite, Sb is typical of pyrite-3, and Co accumulates in pyrite-2. Conclusions. Based on the correlation analysis, it is shown that sulfides of the main ore body and its northwestern satellite are characterized by different mode of TE occurrences. The differences are explained by two main reasons: 1) “mafic” and “ultramafic” metal sources for sulfides of the main ore body and its northwestern satellite, respectively, and 2) different degree of diagenetic alteration of sulfides.

[1]  R. Large,et al.  Chimneys in Paleozoic massive sulfide mounds of the Urals VMS deposits: mineral and trace element comparison with modern black, grey, white and clear smokers , 2017 .

[2]  V. Puchkov.  General features relating to the occurrence of mineral deposits in the Urals: What, where, when and why , 2017 .

[3]  Y. Fouquet,et al.  Tin concentration in hydrothermal sulphides related to ultramafic rocks along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge: a mineralogical study , 2015 .

[4]  P. Nimis,et al.  Cu–(Ni–Co–Au)-bearing massive sulfide deposits associated with mafic–ultramafic rocks of the Main Urals Fault, South Urals: Geological structures, ore textural and mineralogical features, comparison with modern analogs , 2013 .

[5]  R. Large,et al.  Study of Trace Element Zonation in Vent Chimneys from the Silurian Yaman-Kasy Volcanic-Hosted Massive Sulfide Deposit (Southern Urals, Russia) Using Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICPMS) , 2009 .

[6]  R. Large,et al.  Gold and Trace Element Zonation in Pyrite Using a Laser Imaging Technique: Implications for the Timing of Gold in Orogenic and Carlin-Style Sediment-Hosted Deposits , 2009 .

[7]  F. Robert,et al.  Multistage sedimentary and metamorphic origin of pyrite and gold in the giant Sukhoi Log deposit, Lena gold province, Russia , 2007 .

[8]  Y. Fouquet,et al.  Mineralogy, geochemistry, and Nd isotope composition of the Rainbow hydrothermal field, Mid-Atlantic Ridge , 2006 .

[9]  W. McDonough,et al.  The composition of the Earth , 1995 .

[10]  B. Mason.  Composition of the Earth , 1966, Nature.