Global patterns in predator-prey size relationships reveal size dependency of trophic transfer efficiency.

Predator-prey body size relationships influence food chain length, trophic structure, transfer efficiency, interaction strength, and the bioaccumulation of contaminants. Improved quantification of these relationships and their response to the environment is needed to parameterize food web models and describe food web structure and function. A compiled data set comprising 29582 records of individual prey eaten at 21 locations by individual predators that spanned 10 orders of magnitude in mass and lived in marine environments ranging from the poles to the tropics was used to investigate the influence of predator size and environment on predator and prey size relationships. Linear mixed effects models demonstrated that predator-prey mass ratios (PPMR) increased with predator mass. The amount of the increase varied among locations and predator species and individuals but was not significantly influenced by temperature, latitude, depth, or primary production. Increases in PPMR with predator mass implied nonlinear relationships between log body mass and trophic level and reductions in transfer efficiency with increasing body size. The results suggest that very general rules determine dominant trends in PPMR in diverse marine ecosystems, leading to the ubiquity of size-based trophic structuring and the consistency of observed relationships between the relative abundance of individuals and their body size.

[1]  Nelson G. Hairston,et al.  Cause-Effect Relationships in Energy Flow, Trophic Structure, and Interspecific Interactions , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[2]  P. Lundberg,et al.  Trophic and individual efficiencies of size-structured communities , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  S. Jennings,et al.  Smaller predator-prey body size ratios in longer food chains , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  P. Munk.  Larval sand lance (Ammodytes sp.) in the diet of small juvenile wolffish (Anarhichas spp.): predatory interactions in frontal water masses off western Greenland , 2002 .

[5]  J. Elser,et al.  Biosimplicity via stoichiometry: the evolution of food-web structure and processes , 2007 .

[6]  David W. Sims,et al.  Seasonal movements and behaviour of basking sharks from archival tagging: no evidence of winter hibernation , 2003 .

[7]  A. Kellermann.  Food and feeding dynamics of the larval Antarctic fishNototheniops larseni , 1990 .

[8]  P. K. Bjørnsen,et al.  The size ratio between planktonic predators and their prey , 1994 .

[9]  M. D. Casamajor,et al.  Observations ichtyologiques effectuées en 2006 , 2001 .

[10]  B. Chase.  Differences in diet of Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) at five seasonal feeding grounds on the New England continental shelf , 2002 .

[11]  K. Andersen,et al.  Asymptotic Size Determines Species Abundance in the Marine Size Spectrum , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[12]  F. Juanes,et al.  Size-structured piscivory: advection and the linkage between predator and prey recruitment in young-of-the-year bluefish , 1995 .

[13]  K. Stergiou,et al.  Food habits, ontogenetic diet shift and selectivity in Zeus faber Linnaeus, 1758 , 1991 .

[14]  J. Carlson,et al.  Foraging ecology of the early life stages of four sympatric shark species , 2004 .

[15]  S. Jennings,et al.  PREDATOR AND PREY BODY SIZES IN MARINE FOOD WEBS , 2008 .

[16]  D. Post,et al.  The long and short of food-chain length , 2002 .

[17]  S. Jennings,et al.  Abundance-body mass relationships in size-structured food webs , 2003 .

[18]  P. Munk.  Prey size spectra and prey availability of larval and small juvenile cod , 1997 .

[19]  Joan Saldaña,et al.  Body sizes of animal predators and animal prey in food webs , 1993 .

[20]  P. Marquet,et al.  Scaling and power-laws in ecological systems , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[21]  L. M. Dickie,et al.  Biomass Spectra of Aquatic Ecosystems in Relation to Fisheries Yield , 1992 .

[22]  P. Munk,et al.  Contrasting feeding patterns among species of fish larvae from the tropical Andaman Sea , 2005 .

[23]  J. Rasmussen,et al.  Modelling food chain structure and contaminant bioaccumulation using stable nitrogen isotopes , 1994, Nature.

[24]  S. Jennings,et al.  Weak cross‐species relationships between body size and trophic level belie powerful size‐based trophic structuring in fish communities , 2001 .

[25]  Jeremy S. Collie,et al.  Are multispecies models an improvement on single-species models for measuring fishing impacts on marine ecosystems? , 2000 .

[26]  A. Sabatés,et al.  Intra- and interspecific variability in prey size and niche breadth of myctophiform fish larvae , 2000 .

[27]  Y. Shin,et al.  Opportunistic predation in tuna: a size-based approach , 2006 .

[28]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[29]  James H. Brown,et al.  Ecological food webs: High-quality data facilitate theoretical unification , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  F. Juanes,et al.  Predator size - prey size relationships of marine fish predators: interspecific variation and effects of ontogeny and body size on trophic-niche breadth , 2000 .

[31]  D. Pauly,et al.  Flow characteristics of aquatic ecosystems , 1993 .

[32]  V. Ridoux,et al.  Food and feeding ecology of Northeast Atlantic swordfish ( Xiphias gladius ) off the Bay of Biscay , 2006 .

[33]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  Consumer-resource body-size relationships in natural food webs. , 2006, Ecology.

[34]  A. Kellermann.  Food and feeding ecology of postlarval and juvenile Pleuragramma antarcticum (Pisces; Notothenioidei) in the seasonal pack ice zone off the Antarctic peninsula , 1987, Polar Biology.

[35]  U. Borgmann.  Models on the Slope of, and Biomass Flow up, the Biomass Size Spectrum , 1987 .

[36]  Y. Shin,et al.  Exploring fish community dynamics through size dependent trophic interactions using a spatialized individual based model , 2001 .

[37]  Frédéric Mélin,et al.  Global-scale predictions of community and ecosystem properties from simple ecological theory , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  J. Pinnegar,et al.  Does diet in Celtic Sea fishes reflect prey availability , 2003 .

[39]  R. W. Sheldon,et al.  The Size Distribution of Particles in the OCEAN1 , 1972 .

[40]  Guy Woodward,et al.  Body size in ecological networks. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[41]  J. Webb,et al.  Successful surf-riding on size spectra: the secret of survival in the sea , 1994 .

[42]  S. R. Kerr,et al.  SIZE-DEPENDENT PROCESSES UNDERLYING REGULARITIES IN ECOSYSTEM STRUCTURE' , 1987 .

[43]  Simon Jennings,et al.  Application of nitrogen stable isotope analysis in size-based marine food web and macroecological research. , 2008, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[44]  J. Cebrian.  Patterns in the Fate of Production in Plant Communities , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[45]  R. Law,et al.  Size-spectra dynamics from stochastic predation and growth of individuals. , 2009, Ecology.

[46]  D. Raffaelli,et al.  Body Size: The Structure and Function of Aquatic Ecosystems: The Structure and Function of Aquatic Ecosystems , 2007 .

[47]  J. G. Field,et al.  The size-based dynamics of plankton food webs. II. Simulations of three contrasting southern Benguela food webs , 1991 .

[48]  T. Platt,et al.  An estimate of global primary production in the ocean from satellite radiometer data , 1995 .

[49]  Food and feeding ecology of juvenile albacore, Thunnus alalunga, off the Bay of Biscay: a case study , 2005 .

[50]  Carlos M. Duarte,et al.  Nutrient and temperature control of the contribution of picoplankton to phytoplankton biomass and production , 2000 .

[51]  Jeremy S. Collie,et al.  A length-based multispecies model for evaluating community responses to fishing , 2006 .

[52]  J. E. Cohen,et al.  Environmental correlates of food chain length. , 1987, Science.

[53]  D. Reuman,et al.  Trophic links’ length and slope in the Tuesday Lake food web with species’ body mass and numerical abundance , 2004 .

[54]  T. Essington,et al.  Size-structured patterns of piscivory of the longfin inshore squid (Loligo pealeii) in the mid-Atlantic continental shelf ecosystem , 2006 .

[55]  R. Law,et al.  How does abundance scale with body size in coupled size-structured food webs? , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[56]  C. Sassa,et al.  Larval feeding habits of Diaphus garmani and Myctophum asperum (Pisces: Myctophidae) in the transition region of the western North Pacific , 2004 .

[57]  John G. Pope,et al.  Modelling an exploited marine fish community with 15 parameters - results from a simple size-based model , 2006 .

[58]  R. Brodeur.  Prey selection by age-0 walleye pollock, Theragra chalcogramma, in nearshore waters of the Gulf of Alaska , 1998, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[59]  James H. Brown,et al.  Toward a metabolic theory of ecology , 2004 .

[60]  L. M. Dickie,et al.  Biological Model of Fisheries Production Based on Physiological and Ecological Scalings of Body Size , 1989 .

[61]  R. W. Sheldon,et al.  Structure of Pelagic Food Chain and Relationship Between Plankton and Fish Production , 1977 .

[62]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  Food web patterns and their consequences , 1991, Nature.

[63]  Daniel E. Duplisea,et al.  Application of a Biomass Size Spectrum Model to Demersal Fish Data from the Scotian Shelf , 1995 .