Maximizing Audibility and Speech Recognition With Nonlinear Frequency Compression by Estimating Audible Bandwidth

Objective: Nonlinear frequency compression attempts to restore high-frequency audibility by lowering high-frequency input signals. Methods of determining the optimal parameters that maximize speech understanding have not been evaluated. The effect of maximizing the audible bandwidth on speech recognition for a group of listeners with normal hearing is described. Design: Nonword recognition was measured with 20 normal-hearing adults. Three audiograms with different high-frequency thresholds were used to create conditions with varying high-frequency audibility. Bandwidth was manipulated using three conditions for each audiogram: conventional processing, the manufacturer’s default compression parameters, and compression parameters that optimized bandwidth. Results: Nonlinear frequency compression optimized to provide the widest audible bandwidth improved nonword recognition compared with both conventional processing and the default parameters. Conclusions: These results showed that using the widest audible bandwidth maximized speech identification when using nonlinear frequency compression. Future studies should apply these methods to listeners with hearing loss to demonstrate efficacy in clinical populations.

[1]  Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al.  Word recognition in noise at higher-than-normal levels: decreases in scores and increases in masking. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Myriel Nyffeler,et al.  Advantages of a non-linear frequency compression algorithm in noise , 2010, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[3]  P. Stelmachowicz,et al.  Audibility-based predictions of speech recognition for children and adults with normal hearing. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Jill R. Hoover,et al.  An online calculator to compute phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on the basis of child corpora of spoken American English , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[5]  Hugh J. McDermott,et al.  Frequency-compression outcomes in listeners with steeply sloping audiograms , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[6]  Jace Wolfe,et al.  Long-term effects of non-linear frequency compression for children with moderate hearing loss , 2011, International journal of audiology.

[7]  Erin C. Schafer,et al.  Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression for school-age children with moderate to moderately severe hearing loss. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[8]  Sheila Moodie,et al.  The Desired Sensation Level Multistage Input/Output Algorithm , 2005, Trends in amplification.

[9]  Hugh J. McDermott,et al.  Improvements in speech perception with an experimental nonlinear frequency compression hearing device , 2005, International journal of audiology.

[10]  Earl E. Johnson,et al.  Effects of Degree and Configuration of Hearing Loss on the Contribution of High- and Low-Frequency Speech Information to Bilateral Speech Understanding , 2011, Ear and hearing.

[11]  James M. Kates,et al.  Digital hearing aids. , 2008, Harvard health letter.