Effect of Segmentation Variation on ECG Imaging

ECG imaging (ECGI) is the process of calculating electrical cardiac activity from body surface recordings from the geometry and conductivity of the torso volume. A key first step to create geometric models for ECGI and a possible source of considerable variability is to segment the surface of the heart. We hypothesize that this variation in cardiac segmentation will produce variation in the computed ventricular surface potentials from ECGI. To evaluate this hypothesis, we leveraged the resources of the Consortium for ECG Imaging (CEI) to carry out a comparison of ECGI results from the same body surface potentials and multiple ventricular segmentations. We found that using the different segmentations produced variability in the computed ventricular surface potentials. Not surprisingly, locations of greater variance in the computed potential correlated to locations of greater variance in the segmentations, for example near the pulmonary artery and basal anterior left ventricular wall. Our results indicate that ECGI may be more sensitive to segmentation errors on the anterior epicardial surface than on other areas of the heart.

[1]  Dana H. Brooks,et al.  A toolkit for forward/inverse problems in electrocardiography within the SCIRun problem solving environment , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  B. Horáček,et al.  Inverse Solution Mapping of Epicardial Potentials: Quantitative Comparison With Epicardial Contact Mapping , 2012, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[3]  R. Barr,et al.  Relating Epicardial to Body Surface Potential Distributions by Means of Transfer Coefficients Based on Geometry Measurements , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  R. Macleod,et al.  Experimental Data and Geometric Analysis Repository-EDGAR. , 2015, Journal of electrocardiology.

[5]  William M. Wells,et al.  Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Christopher R. Johnson,et al.  The SCIRun Computational Steering Software System , 1997, SciTools.

[7]  R. Gulrajani The forward and inverse problems of electrocardiography. , 1998, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[8]  Dana H. Brooks,et al.  Overcoming barriers to quantification and comparison of electrocardiographic imaging methods: A community-based approach , 2017, 2017 Computing in Cardiology (CinC).

[9]  Miriah D. Meyer,et al.  Entropy-Based Particle Systems for Shape Correspondence , 2006 .

[10]  Dana H. Brooks,et al.  SCIRun/BioPSE: integrated problem solving environment for bioelectric field problems and visualization , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).