An evaluation of the state of spatial point pattern analysis in ecology

Over the last two decades spatial point pattern analysis (SPPA) has become increasingly popular in ecological research. To direct future work in this area we review studies using SPPA techniques in ecology and related disciplines. We first summarize the key elements of SPPA in ecology (i.e. data types, summary statistics and their estimation, null models, comparison of data and models, and consideration of heterogeneity); second, we review how ecologists have used these key elements; and finally, we identify practical difficulties that are still commonly encountered and point to new methods that allow current key questions in ecology to be effectively addressed. Our review of 308 articles published over the period 1992–2012 reveals that a standard canon of SPPA techniques in ecology has been largely identified and that most of the earlier technical issues that occupied ecologists, such as edge correction, have been solved. However, the majority of studies underused the methodological potential offered by modern SPPA. More advanced techniques of SPPA offer the potential to address a variety of highly relevant ecological questions. For example, inhomogeneous summary statistics can quantify the impact of heterogeneous environments, mark correlation functions can include trait and phylogenetic information in the analysis of multivariate spatial patterns, and more refined point process models can be used to realistically characterize the structure of a wide range of patterns. Additionally, recent advances in fitting spatially-explicit simulation models of community dynamics to point pattern summary statistics hold the promise for solving the longstanding problem of linking pattern to process. All these newer developments allow ecologists to keep up with the increasing availability of spatial data sets provided by newer technologies, which allow point patterns and environmental variables to be mapped over large spatial extents at increasingly higher image resolutions.

[1]  R. Waagepetersen,et al.  Two‐step estimation for inhomogeneous spatial point processes , 2009 .

[2]  François Goreaud,et al.  ads Package for R: A Fast Unbiased Implementation of the K-function Family for Studying Spatial Point Patterns in Irregular-Shaped Sampling Windows , 2015 .

[3]  Matteo Detto,et al.  Fitting Ecological Process Models to Spatial Patterns Using Scalewise Variances and Moment Equations , 2013, The American Naturalist.

[4]  Katrin M. Meyer,et al.  Spacing patterns of an Acacia tree in the Kalahari over a 61-year period: How clumped becomes regular and vice versa , 2008 .

[5]  J. Illian,et al.  Ecological information from spatial patterns of plants: insights from point process theory , 2009 .

[6]  A. Watt,et al.  Pattern and process in the plant community , 1947 .

[7]  Stephanie A. Bohlman,et al.  Effects of sampling scale on patterns of habitat association in tropical trees , 2014 .

[8]  Barbara J. Downes,et al.  Spatial point pattern analysis of available and exploited resources , 2004 .

[9]  S. Levin.  The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[10]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  Heterogeneity influences spatial patterns and demographics in forest stands , 2008 .

[11]  Andreas Huth,et al.  Fast calibration of a dynamic vegetation model with minimum observation data , 2015 .

[12]  N. C. Kenkel,et al.  Pattern of Self‐Thinning in Jack Pine: Testing the Random Mortality Hypothesis , 1988 .

[13]  Calum Brown,et al.  Linking ecological processes with spatial and non‐spatial patterns in plant communities , 2011 .

[14]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  Linking trait similarity to interspecific spatial associations in a moist tropical forest , 2015 .

[15]  Andreas Huth,et al.  Neighborhood diversity of large trees shows independent species patterns in a mixed dipterocarp forest in Sri Lanka. , 2015, Ecology.

[16]  Richard Condit,et al.  Tropical Forest Census Plots , 1998, Environmental Intelligence Unit.

[17]  Andreas Huth,et al.  Statistical inference for stochastic simulation models--theory and application. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[18]  Justin M. J. Travis,et al.  Fitting complex ecological point process models with integrated nested Laplace approximation , 2013 .

[19]  George L. W. Perry,et al.  Spatial patterns in species-rich sclerophyll shrublands of southwestern Australia , 2008 .

[20]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Stochastically driven adult–recruit associations of tree species on Barro Colorado Island , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  Bayesian Inference and Data Augmentation Schemes for Spatial, Spatiotemporal and Multivariate Log-Gaussian Cox Processes in R , 2015 .

[22]  Eliot J. B. McIntire,et al.  Beyond description: the active and effective way to infer processes from spatial patterns. , 2009, Ecology.

[23]  Xiangcheng Mi,et al.  Species-area relationships explained by the joint effects of dispersal limitation and habitat heterogeneity. , 2009, Ecology.

[24]  Joshua B Plotkin,et al.  Seed Dispersal and Spatial Pattern in Tropical Trees , 2006, PLoS biology.

[25]  Dietrich Stoyan,et al.  Correct testing of mark independence for marked point patterns , 2011 .

[26]  Pavel Grabarnik,et al.  Incorporating the mechanisms underlying inter-tree competition into a random point process model to improve spatial tree pattern analysis in forestry , 2014 .

[27]  Miguel Delibes,et al.  Unravelling conflicting density‐ and distance‐dependent effects on plant reproduction using a spatially explicit approach , 2015 .

[28]  Andreas Huth,et al.  Recruitment in Tropical Tree Species: Revealing Complex Spatial Patterns , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[29]  J. Elith,et al.  Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time , 2009 .

[30]  Sébastien Barot,et al.  DEMOGRAPHY OF A SAVANNA PALM TREE: PREDICTIONS FROM COMPREHENSIVE SPATIAL PATTERN ANALYSES , 1999 .

[31]  Alex C. Lee,et al.  A LiDAR-derived canopy density model for tree stem and crown mapping in Australian forests , 2007 .

[32]  Kenichiro SHIMATANI,et al.  Quantitative assessment of multispecies spatial pattern with high species diversity , 2004, Ecological Research.

[33]  Dietrich Stoyan,et al.  Deviation test construction and power comparison for marked spatial point patterns , 2013, 1306.1028.

[34]  P. Haase.  Spatial pattern analysis in ecology based on Ripley's K-function: Introduction and methods of edge correction , 1995 .

[35]  P. Diggle,et al.  On tests of spatial pattern based on simulation envelopes , 2014 .

[36]  P. Brown,et al.  Second‐Order Analysis of Inhomogeneous Spatial Point Processes Using Case–Control Data , 2007, Biometrics.

[37]  Brian D. Ripley,et al.  Spatial Statistics: Ripley/Spatial Statistics , 2005 .

[38]  Andreas Huth,et al.  How individual species structure diversity in tropical forests , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Fei Lin,et al.  Mechanisms underlying local functional and phylogenetic beta diversity in two temperate forests. , 2015, Ecology.

[40]  Janusz Szmyt,et al.  Spatial statistics in ecological analysis: from indices to functions , 2014 .

[41]  Fei Lin,et al.  Phylogenetic and functional diversity area relationships in two temperate forests , 2013 .

[42]  Volker Grimm,et al.  Using pattern-oriented modeling for revealing hidden information: a key for reconciling ecological theory and application , 2003 .

[43]  Christine A. Ribic,et al.  Testing for life historical changes in spatial patterns of four tropical tree species. , 1986 .

[44]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Non‐ and semi‐parametric estimation of interaction in inhomogeneous point patterns , 2000 .

[45]  Uta Berger,et al.  Pattern-Oriented Modeling of Agent-Based Complex Systems: Lessons from Ecology , 2005, Science.

[46]  Kenichiro Shimatani.  Multivariate point processes and spatial variation of species diversity , 2001 .

[47]  Andreas Huth,et al.  Moving beyond abundance distributions: neutral theory and spatial patterns in a tropical forest , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  George L. W. Perry,et al.  A comparison of methods for the statistical analysis of spatial point patterns in plant ecology , 2006, Plant Ecology.

[49]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  The consequences of recruitment limitation: reconciling chance, history and competitive differences between plants , 1995 .

[50]  E. D. Ford,et al.  Statistical inference using the g or K point pattern spatial statistics. , 2006, Ecology.

[51]  S. Hubbell,et al.  A systematic comparison of summary characteristics for quantifying point patterns in ecology , 2013 .

[52]  Xiangcheng Mi,et al.  Quantifying spatial phylogenetic structures of fully stem‐mapped plant communities , 2013 .

[53]  Raphaël Pélissier,et al.  A practical approach to the study of spatial structure in simple cases of heterogeneous vegetation , 2001 .

[54]  Steven J. Phillips,et al.  Point process models for presence‐only analysis , 2015 .

[55]  D. Stoyan,et al.  Recent applications of point process methods in forestry statistics , 2000 .

[56]  Adrian Baddeley,et al.  spatstat: An R Package for Analyzing Spatial Point Patterns , 2005 .

[57]  Raphaël Pélissier,et al.  On explicit formulas of edge effect correction for Ripley's K‐function , 1999 .

[58]  P. Chesson.  Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[59]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  Rings, circles, and null-models for point pattern analysis in ecology , 2004 .

[60]  Jeffrey S. Ward,et al.  New derivation reduces bias and increases power of Ripley’s L index , 1999 .

[61]  R. Pélissier,et al.  Avoiding misinterpretation of biotic interactions with the intertype K12-function: population independence vs. random labelling hypotheses , 2003 .

[62]  Kirk A. Moloney,et al.  Detecting process from snapshot pattern: lessons from tree spacing in the southern Kalahari , 1999 .