Real-World Use and Appropriateness of Coronary Interventions for Chronic Total Occlusion (from a Japanese Multicenter Registry).

[1]  J. Spertus,et al.  Procedural outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry). , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[2]  B. Strauss,et al.  Revascularization of chronic total occlusions: time to reconsider? , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  H. Miyata,et al.  Appropriateness ratings of percutaneous coronary intervention in Japan and its association with the trend of noninvasive testing. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[4]  M. Johnston,et al.  M AN US CR IP T AC CE PT ED ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT , 2014 .

[5]  H. Miyata,et al.  Impact of periprocedural bleeding on incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  Subhash Banerjee,et al.  Procedural outcomes of revascularization of chronic total occlusion of native coronary arteries (from a multicenter United States registry). , 2013, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  David Dai,et al.  Enhanced mortality risk prediction with a focus on high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 1,208,137 procedures in the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry). , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[8]  T. Matsubara,et al.  Contemporary retrograde approach for the recanalisation of coronary chronic total occlusion: on behalf of the Japanese Retrograde Summit Group. , 2013, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[9]  Subhash Banerjee,et al.  Angiographic success and procedural complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary chronic total occlusion interventions: a weighted meta-analysis of 18,061 patients from 65 studies. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[10]  J. Tu,et al.  Assessing the association of appropriateness of coronary revascularization and clinical outcomes for patients with stable coronary artery disease. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  Samin K. Sharma,et al.  Appropriateness of coronary revascularization for patients without acute coronary syndromes. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  G. Wright,et al.  Current perspectives on coronary chronic total occlusions: the Canadian Multicenter Chronic Total Occlusions Registry. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  J. Spertus,et al.  ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 Appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Am , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  C. Maynard,et al.  Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Washington State , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[15]  B. Rutherford,et al.  Changes in myocardial ischemic burden following percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions. , 2011 .

[16]  C. Di Mario,et al.  In-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic total occlusion: insights from the ERCTO (European Registry of Chronic Total Occlusion) registry. , 2011, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[17]  Kevin Kennedy,et al.  Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2011, JAMA.

[18]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  Standardized Bleeding Definitions for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: A Consensus Report From the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium , 2011, Circulation.

[19]  J. Spertus,et al.  Concordance of physician ratings with the appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  Y. Hayashi,et al.  Predicting successful guidewire crossing through chronic total occlusion of native coronary lesions within 30 minutes: the J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) score as a difficulty grading and time assessment tool. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[21]  J. Afilalo,et al.  Effectiveness of recanalization of chronic total occlusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2010, American heart journal.

[22]  M. Kimura,et al.  Procedural and in-hospital outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions of coronary arteries 2002 to 2008: impact of novel guidewire techniques. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[23]  A. Gitt,et al.  Chronic total coronary occlusions in patients with stable angina pectoris: impact on therapy and outcome in present day clinical practice , 2009, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[24]  Mario J. Garcia,et al.  ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization , 2009, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[25]  Frederick A. Masoudi,et al.  ACCF/SCAI/STS/MTS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization. Commentary , 2009 .

[26]  R. Christofferson,et al.  Effect of chronic total coronary occlusion on treatment strategy. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[27]  H V Anderson,et al.  The American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry™ (ACC-NCDR™): building a national clinical data repository , 2001 .

[28]  K. Hammermeister,et al.  The American College of Cardiology National Database: Progress and challenges , 1997 .