The Effect of Topographic Correction on Canopy Density Mapping Using Satellite Imagery in Mountainous Area

One of the main factors contributing to radiometric distortion on remote sensing data is topographic effect, but it can be reduced by applying topographic correction. This study identifies the effect of topographic correction on canopy density mapping in Menoreh Mountains, Indonesia. Topographic correction methods examined in this research are C-Correction, Minnaert, and Sun-Canopy-Sensor+C (SCS+C). Canopy density estimation was approached using vegetation indices, i.e. Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Modified Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (MSAVI), Aerosol Free Vegetation Index (AFRI) 1.6, and AFRI 2.1 derived from Landsat-8 OLI imagery. We evaluated the performance of topographic correction by visual and statistical analysis prior to comparing the accuracy of canopy density estimation of different vegetation indices and correction methods. The results showed that topographic normalization is able to increase the accuracy of canopy density mapping. The most significant improvement is the model using MSAVI which increases 1.207% using Minnaert method to reach 86.692% accuracy. Meanwhile, NDVI, AFRI 1.6, and AFRI 2.1 have less significant improvement with the maximum increase of 0.241%, 0.057%, and 0.032% using SCS+C method, reaching the accuracy of 88.980%, 83.303%, and 82.308%, respectively. The accuracies were slightly improved since the algorithms have already reduced the effect of topography which are categorized as ratio vegetation indices. SCS+C is the best topographic correction method, because of not only the appropriate assumption of canopy normalization but also its consistency and better accuracy in canopy density estimation among other methods.

[1]  Projo Danoedoro,et al.  Correcting topographic effect on Landsat-8 images: an evaluation of using different DEMs in Indonesia , 2019, Other Conferences.

[2]  P. Widayani,et al.  The Comparison of Canopy Density Measurement Using UAV and Hemispherical Photography for Remote Sensing Based Mapping , 2018, 2018 4th International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST).

[3]  Gui-zhou Wang,et al.  A coupled atmospheric and topographic correction algorithm for remotely sensed satellite imagery over mountainous terrain , 2018 .

[4]  Irina Melnikova,et al.  Estimation of Leaf Area Index in a Mountain Forest of Central Japan with a 30-m Spatial Resolution Based on Landsat Operational Land Imager Imagery: An Application of a Simple Model for Seasonal Monitoring , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[5]  Jesús Álvarez-Mozos,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation of topographic correction methods , 2016 .

[6]  Hari Adhikari,et al.  The effect of topographic normalization on fractional tree cover mapping in tropical mountains: An assessment based on seasonal Landsat time series , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[7]  Hui Fan,et al.  Evaluating and comparing performances of topographic correction methods based on multi-source DEMs and Landsat-8 OLI data , 2016 .

[8]  Xiaoxia Yang,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF FOUR TYPICAL TOPOGRAPHIC CORRECTIONS IN LANDSAT TM DATA FOR SNOW COVER AREAS , 2016 .

[9]  L. A. Pragasan,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF CARBON STOCK OF TREE VEGETATION IN THE KOLLI HILL FOREST LOCATED IN INDIA , 2016 .

[10]  Huili Gong,et al.  Topographic Correction of ZY-3 Satellite Images and Its Effects on Estimation of Shrub Leaf Biomass in Mountainous Areas , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[11]  Yan Zhen Wu,et al.  Research of Improved Minnaert Topographic Correction Model and Application , 2014 .

[12]  Anton J. J. van Rompaey,et al.  he effect of atmospheric and topographic correction methods on land cover lassification accuracy , 2013 .

[13]  E. Chuvieco,et al.  Evaluation of different topographic correction methods for Landsat imagery , 2011, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[14]  Hermann Kaufmann,et al.  Comparison of Topographic Correction Methods , 2009, Remote. Sens..

[15]  Chen Weia,et al.  A MODEL OF TOPOGRAPHIC CORRECTION AND REFLECTANCE RETRIEVAL FOR OPTICAL SATELLITE DATA IN FORESTED AREAS , 2008 .

[16]  Z. azizia,et al.  FOREST CANOPY DENSITY ESTIMATING , USING SATELLITE IMAGES , 2008 .

[17]  Craig A. Coburn,et al.  SCS+C: a modified Sun-canopy-sensor topographic correction in forested terrain , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[18]  M. Vincini,et al.  Multitemporal evaluation of topographic normalization methods on deciduous forest TM data , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[19]  David Riaño,et al.  Assessment of different topographic corrections in Landsat-TM data for mapping vegetation types (2003) , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[20]  A. Karnieli,et al.  AFRI — aerosol free vegetation index , 2001 .

[21]  J. R. Jensen Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective , 2000 .

[22]  A. Gillespie,et al.  Topographic Normalization of Landsat TM Images of Forest Based on Subpixel Sun–Canopy–Sensor Geometry , 1998 .

[23]  A. Huete,et al.  A Modified Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index , 1994 .

[24]  S. Sandmeier,et al.  Radiometric corrections of topographically induced effects on Landsat TM data in an alpine environment , 1993 .

[25]  John R. Jensen,et al.  Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective , 1986 .

[26]  P. Teillet,et al.  On the Slope-Aspect Correction of Multispectral Scanner Data , 1982 .

[27]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .