Climate change and social transformations: is it time for a quantum leap?

Climate change is recognized as an urgent societal problem with widespread implications for both natural and human systems, and transforming society at the rate and scale that is mandated by the 2015 Paris Agreement remains a major challenge. Do we need to be open to new paradigms for social change? In this opinion piece, I draw attention to the emerging field of quantum social theory and consider its implications for climate change responses. Quantum social theory considers how concepts, methods and understandings from quantum physics relate to societal issues, and it provides a physically based, holistic perspective on conscious and intentional transformations to sustainability. It is distinct from other social theories in that it raises deep metaphysical and ontological questions about what is really real. I explore the methodological, metaphorical and meaningful significance of quantum social theory for understandings of social change. Quantum concepts such as entanglement, complementarity, uncertainty, and superposition provide a strong basis for recognizing and promoting people as the solution to climate change. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

[1]  Vlatko Vedral,et al.  Living in a quantum world. , 2011, Scientific American.

[2]  S. Marston,et al.  Human geography without scale , 2005 .

[3]  F. Geels Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective , 2010 .

[4]  N. Mermin,et al.  Physics: QBism puts the scientist back into science , 2014, Nature.

[5]  W. Peterman Quantum Theory and Geography: What Can Dr. Bertlmann Teach Us? , 1994 .

[6]  Sophie A. Nicholson-Cole,et al.  Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications , 2007 .

[7]  S. Niemeyer,et al.  “What sceptics believe”: The effects of information and deliberation on climate change scepticism , 2013, Public understanding of science.

[8]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum-like brain: "Interference of minds". , 2006, Bio Systems.

[9]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  Quantum cognition: a new theoretical approach to psychology , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Barry Newell,et al.  A conceptual template for integrative human–environment research , 2005 .

[11]  Karen Barad Meeting the Universe Halfway: Realism and Social Constructivism without Contradiction , 1996 .

[12]  F. Chapin,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity , 2009 .

[13]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  Empirical Comparison of Markov and Quantum models of decision-making , 2009 .

[14]  Ruediger Schack,et al.  Quantum-Bayesian Coherence , 2009, 1301.3274.

[15]  Karen O'Brien,et al.  Political agency: The key to tackling climate change , 2015, Science.

[16]  Karen Barad Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter , 2003, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[17]  W. Peterman Response to Commentaries by Craig Campbell, Lyle Courtney and Walter G. Hardwick, and John E. Chappell, Jr. , 1995 .

[18]  J. Eisert,et al.  Quantum Games and Quantum Strategies , 1998, quant-ph/9806088.

[19]  C. Rosado Context Determines Content: Quantum Physics as a Framework for `Wholeness' in Urban Transformation , 2008 .