Design, Risk and New Product Development in Five Small Creative Companies

Five small creative companies were studied in detail over extended periods of the New Product Development (NPD) lifecycle. Design was a key aspect of company activity and central to the NPD process. Novel risk-tracking participatory methodologies were developed and employed to identify perceived risks at the outset of NPD and to track risk thereafter. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken on regular basis with company personnel responsible for design to provide rich contextual material. Results showed a wide diversity of perceived risk with little commonality amongst the companies – despite shared core criteria amongst the firms themselves, and the new products that were tracked. Implications for the sampled companies, and wider policy in respect of business support strategy, are considered.

[1]  Phil Johnson,et al.  Action research: Explaining the diversity , 2006 .

[2]  B. Hutter,et al.  Organizational encounters with risk: an introduction , 2005 .

[3]  Christine Vallaster,et al.  Participatory group observation – a tool to analyze strategic decision making , 2002 .

[4]  N. Cross.  Designerly ways of knowing , 2006 .

[5]  R. Calantone,et al.  Determinants of New Product Performance: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 1994 .

[6]  Robert Jerrard,et al.  Risk in Design: Key Issues from the Literature , 2006 .

[7]  Kees Dorst,et al.  Comparing paradigms for describing design activity , 1995 .

[8]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Powers of observation in creative design , 1996 .

[9]  H. Simon,et al.  The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[10]  J. A. Andersen,et al.  Intuition in managers , 2000 .

[11]  Donald A. Schön.  Beyond the stable state , 1971 .

[12]  Paul Halstead,et al.  Bad Year Economics , 1989 .

[13]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Untangling the Intuition Mess: Intuition as a Construct in Entrepreneurship Research , 2005 .

[14]  John Beatty,et al.  The Empire of Chance: How Probability Changed Science and Everyday Life , 1989 .

[15]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  Moral Hazard in Teams , 1982 .

[16]  C. Huxham,et al.  Researching Organizational Practice through Action Research: Case Studies and Design Choices , 2003 .

[17]  Donald A. Schön.  Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation , 1992, Knowl. Based Syst..

[18]  Debraj Ray,et al.  Group Formation in Risk-Sharing Arrangements , 2003 .

[19]  Bob Jerrard,et al.  Managing New Product Innovation , 1999 .

[20]  Jim Joop Halman,et al.  From experience : applying the risk diagnosing methodology , 2002 .

[21]  Christopher W. Allinson,et al.  Intuition and entrepreneurial behaviour , 2000 .

[22]  C. Eden,et al.  Action Research for Management Research , 1996 .

[23]  Raymonde Guindon.  Designing the design process: exploiting opportunistic thoughts , 1990 .

[24]  David Hands,et al.  Design Management Case Studies , 2002 .

[25]  S. Bruyn.  The Human Perspective in Sociology: The Methodology of Participant Observation , 1986 .

[26]  Heather Stuart,et al.  The future for risk research , 2000 .

[27]  Tom Peters.  Design is IT , 2010 .

[28]  B. Turner,et al.  The Future for Risk Research , 1994 .

[29]  Jonathon E. Mote,et al.  The laws of the markets , 2000 .