Confirmed traffic in LoRaWAN: Pitfalls and countermeasures

LoRaWAN networks are growing in popularity and adoption, mainly thanks to the inexpensive devices, the affordable gateway costs, and the possibility to opt for a private deployment or the use of global network providers. While the main use case for these networks is sensor data collection, the standard also defines confirmed messages, for which downlink transmissions are required. In this paper we show that an incautious use of this feature can bring a sharp decrease in the performance of the network, especially for large scale deployments. Additionally, we present some insights on how certain design choices for downlink communication in LoRaWAN are impairing confirmed traffic usage and propose some solutions to mitigate the issue.

[1]  Dmitry Bankov,et al.  Mathematical model of LoRaWAN channel access with capture effect , 2017, 2017 IEEE 28th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[2]  Ingrid Moerman,et al.  Scalability Analysis of Large-Scale LoRaWAN Networks in ns-3 , 2017, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[3]  Claire Goursaud,et al.  Dedicated networks for IoT : PHY / MAC state of the art and challenges , 2015, IOT 2015.

[4]  Mahesh Sooriyabandara,et al.  Does Bidirectional Traffic Do More Harm Than Good in LoRaWAN Based LPWA Networks? , 2017, GLOBECOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference.

[5]  Davide Magrin,et al.  Performance evaluation of LoRa networks in a smart city scenario , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[6]  Andrea Zanella,et al.  Long-range communications in unlicensed bands: the rising stars in the IoT and smart city scenarios , 2015, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[7]  Andrea Zanella,et al.  Long-Range IoT Technologies: The Dawn of LoRa™ , 2015, FABULOUS.