Finite element modelling of mixed-mode delamination propagation in Abaqus/Explicit with linear and nonlinear cohesive softening laws

Accurate modelling of delamination propagation in laminates is key to predicting the failure of composite structures. In this study, an implementation of the Cohesive Zone Model (CZM) using a novel mixed-mode formulation based on defining an effective separation and allowing for generalizable non-linear cohesive traction-separation softening laws, is presented and evaluated. To this end, several finite element models representing a laminate specimenunder puremode I, puremode II, ormixed-mode conditions, respectively, are constructed and benchmarked against other studies from literature. Then, the influence of the cohesive softening law shapes on the load-displacement response of the specimen is evaluated. Results show that, with the appropriate softening law shape, the novel implementation successfully captures delamination growth and most load-displacement characteristics without the need for an empirical energy criterion.

[1]  A. Waas,et al.  Modeling delamination migration in composite laminates using an enhanced semi-discrete damage model (eSD2M) , 2021, International Journal of Solids and Structures.

[2]  S. Yoon,et al.  Experimental study on effects of asymmetrical stacking sequence on carbon fiber/epoxy filament wound specimens in DCB, ENF, and MMB tests , 2021 .

[3]  M. Czabaj,et al.  Piecewise-linear generalizable cohesive element approach for simulating mixed-mode delamination , 2021 .

[4]  L. Gorbatikh,et al.  An Incremental Cohesive Law for Delamination Under a Mixed Mode Loading , 2020, Frontiers in Materials.

[5]  G. Lubineau,et al.  An enriched cohesive law using plane-part of interfacial strains to model intra/inter laminar coupling in laminated composites , 2020, Composites Science and Technology.

[6]  R. Estevez,et al.  An analytical model for DCB/wedge tests based on Timoshenko beam kinematics for accurate determination of cohesive zone lengths , 2020, International Journal of Fracture.

[7]  Marco S. Pigazzini,et al.  A new multi-layer approach for progressive damage simulation in composite laminates based on isogeometric analysis and Kirchhoff–Love shells. Part I: basic theory and modeling of delamination and transverse shear , 2018 .

[8]  A. Waas,et al.  Closed-form solutions for cohesive zone modeling of delamination toughness tests , 2016 .

[9]  Anthony M. Waas,et al.  Nonlinear, finite deformation, finite element analysis , 2016 .

[10]  Ronald Krueger,et al.  A summary of benchmark examples to assess the performance of quasi-static delamination propagation prediction capabilities in finite element codes , 2015 .

[11]  Donato Girolamo,et al.  Cohesive Laws and Progressive Damage Analysis of Composite Bonded Joints, a Combined Numerical/Experimental Approach , 2015 .

[12]  Pedro P. Camanho,et al.  A damage model for the simulation of delamination in advanced composites under variable-mode loading , 2006 .

[13]  P. Camanho,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Mixed-Mode Progressive Delamination in Composite Materials , 2003 .

[14]  Milan Jirásek,et al.  Consistent tangent stiffness for nonlocal damage models , 2002 .

[15]  R. R. James,et al.  Refinements to the Mixed-Mode Bending Test for Delamination Toughness , 2000 .

[16]  M. A. Crisfield,et al.  Progressive Delamination Using Interface Elements , 1998 .

[17]  E. M. Wu,et al.  CRACK EXTENSION IN FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTICS , 1965 .

[18]  D. S. Dugdale Yielding of steel sheets containing slits , 1960 .

[19]  R. K. Jokia,et al.  A mixed mode cohesive model for FRP laminates incorporating large scale bridging behaviour , 2020 .

[20]  N. Zobeiry Extracting the strain-softening response of composites using full-field displacement measurement , 2010 .

[21]  M. Elices,et al.  The cohesive zone model: advantages, limitations and challenges , 2002 .

[22]  M. Benzeggagh,et al.  Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus , 1996 .

[23]  M. Kanninen,et al.  A finite element calculation of stress intensity factors by a modified crack closure integral , 1977 .