Virtual Reality Reflection Therapy Improves Motor Recovery and Motor Function in the Upper Extremities of People with Chronic Stroke

[Purpose] The main purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of Virtual Reality Reflection Therapy on motor recovery and motor function in the upper extremities of patients with chronic stroke. [Subjects] Nineteen participants patients with chronic stroke were randomly assigned to the experimental group (n=11) and the control group (n=8). [Methods] The experimental group performed a Virtual Reality Reflection Therapy program for 30 minutes a day, 5 days a week, during a 4 week period, in addition to conventional therapy. The control group received conventional therapy and performed sham program. All subjects were evaluated using by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (upper limb section), the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), the Box and Block Test (BBT), the JebsenTaylor Hand Function Test and the Manual Function Test preand post-intervention. [Results] The experimental group and the control group effectively increased their upper-extremity motor recovery and motor function. Upperextremity motor recovery and motor function of the experimental group showed more significant increases than those of the control group. [Conclusion] Virtual Reality Reflection Therapy (even as a home treatment) with a conventional program in the early stages of treatment might be beneficial for improving hand function. Future studies need to investigate the effectiveness of Virtual Reality Reflection Therapy with optimal patient selection or duration and intensity of training.

[1]  H. Stam,et al.  Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  S. Izumi,et al.  Reliability and Validity of the Manual Function Test in Patients with Stroke , 2009, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[3]  R. H. Jebsen,et al.  An objective and standardized test of hand function. , 1969, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  Pamela W. Duncan,et al.  Disability Measures in Stroke: Relationship Among the Barthel Index, the Functional Independence Measure, and the Modified Rankin Scale , 2004, Stroke.

[6]  J C Wall,et al.  Gait asymmetries in residual hemiplegia. , 1986, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  Ray-Yau Wang,et al.  Dual-task-related gait changes in individuals with stroke. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[8]  G. Yavuzer,et al.  Mirror therapy enhances lower-extremity motor recovery and motor functioning after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  Mahmood Saghaei,et al.  Random allocation software for parallel group randomized trials , 2004, BMC medical research methodology.

[10]  P. Duncan,et al.  Adherence to Postacute Rehabilitation Guidelines Is Associated With Functional Recovery in Stroke , 2002, Stroke.

[11]  J. A. Stevens,et al.  Simulation of Bilateral Movement Training Through Mirror Reflection: A Case Report Demonstrating an Occupational Therapy Technique for Hemiparesis , 2004, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[12]  L. Stone,et al.  Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror , 1999, The Lancet.

[13]  S L Wolf,et al.  Doing It with Mirrors: A Case Study of a Novel Approach to Neurorehabilitation , 2000, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[14]  J. Summers,et al.  Mirror, mirror on the wall: viewing a mirror reflection of unilateral hand movements facilitates ipsilateral M1 excitability , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  A. Pizzi,et al.  Evaluation of upper-limb spasticity after stroke: A clinical and neurophysiologic study. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. , 1985, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[17]  S. G. Nelson,et al.  Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. , 1983, Physical therapy.

[18]  Derick T Wade,et al.  The clinical aspects of mirror therapy in rehabilitation: a systematic review of the literature , 2011, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[19]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[21]  J. Carr,et al.  Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. , 1985, Physical therapy.

[22]  J. A. Stevens,et al.  Using motor imagery in the rehabilitation of hemiparesis. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  L. Craighero,et al.  Electrophysiology of Action Representation , 2004, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[24]  Toshio Higashi,et al.  Increased corticospinal excitability during direct observation of self-movement and indirect observation with a mirror box , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.