Quality managers: Beyond 2000?

A review on current quality management literature discloses a conglomeration of sentiments amongst quality managers with regards to the future of their quality profession. These sentiments can primarily be grouped into two categories: (1) that quality managers will no longer play a role in functional management, as quality will become an integral part of the organization; and (2) alternatively, they will play a significantly different role, leading to a specialized job design (Stratton, 1996, Quality Progress, 29, pp. 73-74). Despite the fact that many have voiced their concerns regarding the future of the quality profession, little formal research has been conducted to address this issue. Thus, the significance of undertaking this research is to aim to verify and substantiate their sentiments. Findings of the research may also contribute as a signal to quality managers with regards to their future roles and may inspire them to prepare themselves better for meeting future qualityrelated endeavours. It is important not to prophesy the precise future role of quality managers, as no one outside the psychic industry will claim to be capable of it. Rather, the research endeavours to predict the role of quality manager in the next decade by conducting interviews with various professionals in the quality-related fields, testing the significance of research questions generated from these interviews through surveys and reviewing current quality manager-related literature. Thus, synthesizing the results from the above-mentioned means to predict the role of quality managers in the years beyond 2000.

[1]  M. Dodgson Organizational Learning: A Review of Some Literatures , 1993 .

[2]  Christian De Cock,et al.  TQM and BPR: Beyond the Beyond Myth , 1997 .

[3]  Michael Hammer,et al.  Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate , 1990 .

[4]  J. Dean,et al.  MANAGEMENT THEORY AND TOTAL QUALITY: IMPROVING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE THROUGH THEORY DEVELOPMENT , 1994 .

[5]  Kostas N. Dervitsiotis,et al.  The challenge of managing organizational change: Exploring the relationship of re-engineering, developing learning organizations and total quality management , 1998 .

[6]  S. Sitkin,et al.  DISTINGUISHING CONTROL FROM LEARNING IN TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT: A CONTINGENCY PERSPECTIVE , 1994 .

[7]  Danny Miller,et al.  Momentum and Revolution in Organizational Adaptation , 1980 .

[8]  Roger Hoerl,et al.  SIX SIGMA AND THE FUTURE OF THE QUALITY PROFESSION , 1998 .

[9]  Fred Kofman,et al.  Communities of commitment: The heart of learning organizations , 1993 .

[10]  R. Lakin,et al.  BPR enabling software for the financial services industry , 1996 .

[11]  Patrick E. Connor Total Quality Management: A Selective Commentary on Its Human Dimensions, with Special Reference to Its Downside. , 1997 .

[12]  F. Caeldries Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution , 1994 .

[14]  Gary Born Process Management to Quality Improvement: The Way to Design, Document and Re-engineer Business Systems , 1994 .

[15]  H. Edmund Bergeron,et al.  Is Quality Dead , 1995 .

[16]  A. Sohal,et al.  Business process reengineering: Application and success in Australia , 1997 .

[17]  John O. Burdett TQM and Re‐engineering , 1994 .

[18]  D. Schulz What a wonderful world it could be , 1997 .

[19]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution , 1995 .

[20]  Vincent K. Omachonu,et al.  Principles of Total Quality , 1999 .

[21]  Trevor Thornett The Future of the Organisation ‐ Achieving Excellence through Business Transformation , 1998 .

[22]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  The death and life of the American quality movement , 1995 .

[23]  S. Feinberg Why managers oppose TQM , 1998 .