The Emergent Action Field of Metrics: From Rankings to Altmetrics

Abstract Much has been analyzed regarding the origins and the impact of rankings and metrics on policies, behaviors, and missions of universities. Surprisingly, little attention has been allocated to describing and analyzing the emergence of metrics as a new action field. This industry, fueled by the “new public management” policy perspectives that operate at the backstage of the contemporary pervasive “regime of excellence,” still remains a black box worth exploring in depth. This paper intends to fill this loophole. It first sets the stage for this new action field by stressing the differences between the policy fields of higher education in the United States and Europe, as a way to understand the specificities of the use of metrics and rankings on both continents. The second part describes the actors of the field, which productive organizations they build, what skills they combine, which products they put on the market, and their shared norms and audiences.

[1]  P. Teixeira Two Continents Divided by the Same Trends? Reflections about Marketization, Competition, and Inequality in European Higher Education , 2016 .

[2]  Georg Krücken,et al.  Nested Organizational Fields: Isomorphism and Differentiation among European Universities , 2016 .

[3]  Domingo Docampo,et al.  Reproducibility of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities results , 2013, Scientometrics.

[4]  Peter Miller,et al.  Accounting and the construction of the governable person , 1987 .

[5]  E. Berman,et al.  Student Loans as a Pressure on U.S. Higher Education , 2016 .

[6]  Nicholas A. Bowman,et al.  Getting on the Front Page: Organizational Reputation, Status Signals, and the Impact of U.S. News and World Report on Student Decisions , 2009 .

[7]  B. Godin The Knowledge-Based Economy: Conceptual Framework or Buzzword? , 2006 .

[8]  A. Fontana,et al.  The Courage of the Truth , 2011 .

[9]  Ricardo Arencibia-Jorge,et al.  Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor , 2008, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[10]  Simon Marginson,et al.  University Rankings in Critical Perspective , 2013 .

[11]  E. Garfield From Citation Indexes to Informetrics: Is the Tail Now Wagging the Dog ? , 1998 .

[12]  S. Rijcke,et al.  Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics , 2015, Nature.

[13]  M. Stevens,et al.  COMMENSURATION AS A SOCIAL PROCESS , 1998 .

[14]  N. Rose Governing by numbers: Figuring out democracy☆ , 1991 .

[15]  Peter van den Besselaar,et al.  The social construction of indicators for evaluation: Internationalization of Funding Agencies , 2012 .

[16]  R. Whitley,et al.  Reconfiguring Knowledge Production , 2010 .

[17]  Jean-Claude Thoenig,et al.  Academic Institutions in Search of Quality: Local Orders and Global Standards , 2013 .

[18]  James A. Evans,et al.  Reconciling the Small Effect of Rankings on University Performance with the Transformational Cost of Conformity , 2016 .

[19]  W. Espeland,et al.  Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  R. Boudon Toward a synthetic theory of rationality , 1993 .

[21]  E. Hazelkorn The Impact of League Tables and Ranking Systems on Higher Education Decision Making , 2007 .

[22]  A. Binder,et al.  Selling Students: The Rise of Corporate Partnership Programs in University Career Centers , 2016 .