Saving resources: avian influenza surveillance using pooled swab samples and reduced reaction volumes in real-time RT-PCR.

The occurrence of highly pathogenic (HP) avian influenza (AI) H5N1 in Asia and its spread to Africa and Europe prompted costly monitoring programs of wild birds and domestic poultry. AI virus excretion is tested by examining avian swab samples by real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR). In this study, pools of swab samples and a reagents volume reduction per RT-qPCR were evaluated as measures of economization. Viral transport medium and faecal matrices were spiked with different low pathogenic AI virus strains and tested for loss of target RNA during all processing steps as individual rayon swabs or in sample pools of 5, 10 and 15 swabs. Fresh faeces from Mallard ducks and other aquatic bird species as sample matrix resulted in loss of AIV RNA of about 90% compared to transport medium. Due to sample RNA dilution in pools the likelihood of detection of single positive samples is decreasing with increasing size of sample pools. However, pools of five samples containing only one positive sample consistently gave positive results. Similarly, no differences in detection rates were obtained when analyzing 1030 wild bird swab samples either individually or in pools of five. Reducing the reaction volume of influenza A virus generic as well as of subtype-specific RT-qPCRs to 12.5 μl (2.5 μl template) instead of 25 μl did not adversely affect the limit of detection of these RT-qPCRs. A significant economic benefit without impeding detection efficacy can be achieved when sample pools of five samples are analyzed by RT-qPCR using a reduction of the reaction mix to the half of the original volume.

[1]  K. Lohman,et al.  Development of a Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase PCR Assay for Type A Influenza Virus and the Avian H5 and H7 Hemagglutinin Subtypes , 2002, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[2]  A. Osterhaus,et al.  Practical Considerations for High-Throughput Influenza A Virus Surveillance Studies of Wild Birds by Use of Molecular Diagnostic Tests , 2009, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[3]  Thomas Unger,et al.  Quantitative real-time RT-PCR data analysis: current concepts and the novel “gene expression’s CT difference” formula , 2006, Journal of Molecular Medicine.

[4]  I. Brown,et al.  Role of Real-Time RT-PCR Platform Technology in the Diagnosis and Management of Notifiable Avian Influenza Outbreaks: Experiences in Great Britain , 2010, Avian diseases.

[5]  M. Beer,et al.  New real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reactions facilitate detection and differentiation of novel A/H1N1 influenza virus in porcine and human samples. , 2010, Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift.

[6]  M. Beer,et al.  Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus Infection of Mallards with Homo- and Heterosubtypic Immunity Induced by Low Pathogenic Avian Influenza Viruses , 2009, PloS one.

[7]  M. Beer,et al.  Avian influenza virus monitoring in wintering waterbirds in Iran, 2003-2007 , 2010, Virology Journal.

[8]  Peter Rådström,et al.  Strategies to Generate PCR-Compatible Samples , 2004 .

[9]  D. Suarez,et al.  Removal of Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) Inhibitors Associated with Cloacal Swab Samples and Tissues for Improved Diagnosis of Avian Influenza Virus by RT-PCR , 2009, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[10]  W. Wiriyarat,et al.  COMPARISON OF OUTBREAKS OF H5N1 HIGHLY PATHOGENIC AVIAN INFLUENZA IN WILD BIRDS AND POULTRY IN THAILAND , 2009, Journal of wildlife diseases.

[11]  C. Brand Surveillance plan for the early detection of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus in migratory birds in the United States: surveillance year 2009 , 2009 .

[12]  J. Fleiss Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[13]  M. Lutman,et al.  Surveillance for highly pathogenic avian influenza in wild birds in the USA. , 2009, Integrative zoology.

[14]  J. Gelb,et al.  Comparison of Pooling 11 or 5 Oropharyngeal Swabbings for Detecting Avian Influenza Virus by Real-Time Reverse Transcription–PCR in Broiler Chickens , 2012, Avian diseases.