Privacy and modern cars through a dual lens

Modern cars technologies are evolving quickly. They collect a variety of personal data and treat it on behalf of the car manufacturer to improve the drivers’ experience. The precise terms of such a treatment are stated within the privacy policies accepted by the user when buying a car or through the infotainment system when it is first started. This paper uses a double lens to assess people’s privacy while they drive a car. The first approach is objective and studies the readability of privacy policies that comes with cars. We analyse the privacy policies of twelve car brands and apply well-known readability indices to evaluate the extent to which privacy policies are comprehensible by all drivers. The second approach targets drivers’ opinions to extrapolate their privacy concerns and trust perceptions. We design a questionnaire to collect the opinions of 88 participants and draw essential statistics about them. Our combined findings indicate that privacy is insufficiently understood at present as an issue deriving from driving a car, hence future technologies should be tailored to make people more aware of the issue and to enable them to express their preferences.

[1]  Fabio Martinelli,et al.  Driver and Path Detection through Time-Series Classification , 2018 .

[2]  Michael Sivak,et al.  A survey of public opinion about connected vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE).

[3]  M. L. Stein,et al.  How to write plain English , 1975 .

[4]  EDPB Guidelines 1/2020 on processing personal data in the context of connected vehicles and mobility related applications , 2020 .

[5]  G. Harry McLaughlin,et al.  SMOG Grading - A New Readability Formula. , 1969 .

[6]  Gianpiero Costantino,et al.  CANDY: A Social Engineering Attack to Leak Information from Infotainment System , 2018, 2018 IEEE 87th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[7]  Daniel Le Métayer,et al.  Analysis of Privacy Policies to Enhance Informed Consent (Extended Version) , 2019, DBSec.

[8]  Ziad O. Abu-Faraj,et al.  Design and Development of a Heart-Attack Detection Steering Wheel , 2018, 2018 11th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI).

[9]  Mark de Reuver,et al.  Can privacy concerns for insurance of connected cars be compensated? , 2016, Electron. Mark..

[10]  J. Lloyd,et al.  National Association of Insurance Commissioners , 2016 .

[11]  Mathieu d'Aquin,et al.  Assessing the Readability of Policy Documents: The Case of Terms of Use of Online Services , 2018, ICEGOV.

[12]  J. Olsen,et al.  The European Commission , 2020, The European Union.

[13]  Tadayoshi Kohno,et al.  Automobile Driver Fingerprinting , 2016, Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol..

[14]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[15]  M. Coleman,et al.  A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring. , 1975 .

[16]  E A Smith,et al.  Automated readability index. , 1967, AMRL-TR. Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories.

[17]  P. Alam ‘S’ , 2021, Composites Engineering: An A–Z Guide.