Interactions between normal and transformed epithelial cells: Their contributions to tumourigenesis.

During the initial stages of carcinogenesis, neoplastic transformation occurs in single epithelial cells and the transformed cells proliferate while being surrounded by normal epithelia. In Drosophila, normal and transformed epithelial cells compete with each other for survival, a process called cell competition. However, it was not known whether comparable phenomena also occur in mammals. Recently, several reports have shown that the interaction between normal and transformed epithelial cells causes various phenomena in mammals. For example, with elaborate cell culture systems that express oncoproteins or knockdown tumour suppressor proteins in an inducible manner, certain types of transformed cells have been shown to be apically eliminated from normal epithelial layers in an apoptosis-dependent or -independent manner. During the process of apical extrusion, various signalling pathways are modulated in transformed cells located within the normal epithelium, indicating that the presence of surrounding normal epithelial cells affects the behaviour and fate of transformed cells. Recent studies in mice have also shown that normal and transformed cells can compete with each other for survival during several processes such as liver regeneration. In this review, we will introduce these recent publications on interactions between normal and transformed mammalian epithelial cells. Furthermore, we will discuss how these studies can potentially lead to identification of biomarkers for precancerous cells and to invention of novel types of cancer prevention and treatment.

[1]  E. Matunis,et al.  Dedifferentiating spermatogonia outcompete somatic stem cells for niche occupancy in the Drosophila testis. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[2]  Frans,et al.  Loss of epithelial differentiation and gain of invasiveness correlates with tyrosine phosphorylation of the E-cadherin/beta-catenin complex in cells transformed with a temperature-sensitive v-SRC gene , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  Wei Li,et al.  Genes Affecting Cell Competition in Drosophila , 2007, Genetics.

[4]  Jean-Paul Vincent,et al.  Characterization of the interface between normal and transformed epithelial cells , 2009, Nature Cell Biology.

[5]  K. Willecke,et al.  Growth inhibition of oncogene-transformed rat fibroblasts by cocultured normal cells: relevance of metabolic cooperation mediated by gap junctions. , 1991, Cancer research.

[6]  Wei Li,et al.  Cell competition and its possible relation to cancer. , 2008, Cancer research.

[7]  Guillaume Charras,et al.  Interaction with surrounding normal epithelial cells influences signalling pathways and behaviour of Src-transformed cells , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[8]  J. Bertram.  Modulation of cellular interactions between C3H/10T1/2 cells and their transformed counterparts by phosphodiesterase inhibitors. , 1979, Cancer research.

[9]  C. Naus,et al.  Normal Cells Control the Growth of Neighboring Transformed Cells Independent of Gap Junctional Communication and Src Activity , 2004, Cancer Research.

[10]  W. Birchmeier,et al.  Hakai, a c-Cbl-like protein, ubiquitinates and induces endocytosis of the E-cadherin complex , 2002, Nature Cell Biology.

[11]  W. McGinnis,et al.  Molecular cloning of lethal(2)giant larvae, a recessive oncogene of Drosophila melanogaster. , 1985, The EMBO journal.

[12]  M. Takeichi,et al.  Experimental specification of cell sorting, tissue spreading, and specific spatial patterning by quantitative differences in cadherin expression. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Ting Xie,et al.  Differentiation-defective stem cells outcompete normal stem cells for niche occupancy in the Drosophila ovary. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[14]  Elise C. Kohn,et al.  The microenvironment of the tumour–host interface , 2001, Nature.

[15]  S. Tapscott,et al.  Loss of cell polarity causes severe brain dysplasia in Lgl1 knockout mice. , 2004, Genes & development.

[16]  T. Hunter,et al.  Transforming gene product of Rous sarcoma virus phosphorylates tyrosine , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  J. Parsons,et al.  Src family kinases, key regulators of signal transduction , 2004, Oncogene.

[18]  N. Baker,et al.  Engulfment Is Required for Cell Competition , 2007, Cell.

[19]  Robert A. Weinberg,et al.  Ras oncogenes: split personalities , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[20]  R. Weinberg,et al.  Tumor-host interactions: a far-reaching relationship. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  M. Oertel,et al.  Cell competition leads to a high level of normal liver reconstitution by transplanted fetal liver stem/progenitor cells. , 2006, Gastroenterology.

[22]  W. Loewenstein,et al.  Growth inhibition of transformed cells correlates with their junctional communication with normal cells , 1986, Cell.

[23]  C. Heisenberg,et al.  Coordinated cell-shape changes control epithelial movement in zebrafish and Drosophila , 2006, Development.

[24]  G. Dakubo,et al.  Clinical implications and utility of field cancerization , 2007, Cancer Cell International.

[25]  Konrad Basler,et al.  dMyc Transforms Cells into Super-Competitors , 2004, Cell.

[26]  M. Bignami,et al.  Specific viral oncogenes cause differential effects on cell‐to‐cell communication, relevant to the suppression of the transformed phenotype by normal cells , 1988, Molecular carcinogenesis.

[27]  L. Johnston,et al.  Drosophila Myc Regulates Organ Size by Inducing Cell Competition , 2004, Cell.

[28]  D. Larson,et al.  Csk-deficient boundary cells are eliminated from normal Drosophila epithelia by exclusion, migration, and apoptosis. , 2006, Developmental cell.

[29]  C. R. Leemans,et al.  A genetic explanation of Slaughter's concept of field cancerization: evidence and clinical implications. , 2003, Cancer research.

[30]  M. Stoker.  REGULATION OF GROWTH AND ORIENTATION IN HAMSTER CELLS TRANSFORMED BY POLYOMA VIRUS. , 1964, Virology.

[31]  L. Johnston,et al.  Competitive Interactions Between Cells: Death, Growth, and Geography , 2009, Science.

[32]  D Bilder,et al.  Cooperative regulation of cell polarity and growth by Drosophila tumor suppressors. , 2000, Science.

[33]  Z. Werb,et al.  Tumors as organs: complex tissues that interface with the entire organism. , 2010, Developmental cell.

[34]  C. O'neill,et al.  Growth inhibition of polyoma-transformed cells by contact with static normal fibroblasts. , 1966, Journal of cell science.

[35]  H. Richardson,et al.  Abnormalities in cell proliferation and apico-basal cell polarity are separable in Drosophila lgl mutant clones in the developing eye. , 2007, Developmental biology.

[36]  Eduardo Moreno,et al.  Persistent competition among stem cells and their daughters in the Drosophila ovary germline niche , 2009, Development.

[37]  R. Medzhitov,et al.  p53-mediated hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell competition. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[38]  T. Liu,et al.  Involvement of Lgl and Mahjong/VprBP in Cell Competition , 2010, PLoS biology.

[39]  H. Moses,et al.  Tumor-stroma interactions. , 2005, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[40]  G. Morata,et al.  Minutes: mutants of drosophila autonomously affecting cell division rate. , 1975, Developmental biology.

[41]  I. Weissman,et al.  Stem Cells Are Units of Natural Selection in a Colonial Ascidian , 2006, Cell.

[42]  Mina J. Bissell,et al.  Putting tumours in context , 2001, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[43]  N. Carragher,et al.  v-SRC'S hold over actin and cell adhesions , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[44]  M. Frame,et al.  Src in cancer: deregulation and consequences for cell behaviour. , 2002, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[45]  L. Sachs,et al.  THE DIFFERENCE IN CONTACT INHIBITION OF CELL REPLICATION BETWEEN NORMAL CELLS AND CELLS TRANSFORMED BY DIFFERENT CARCINOGENS* , 1966, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  T. Glaser,et al.  Ribosomal protein L24 defect in Belly spot and tail (Bst), a mouse Minute , 2004, Development.

[47]  M. Bignami,et al.  Differential influence of adjacent normal cells on the proliferation of mammalian cells transformed by the viral oncogenes myc, ras and src. , 1988, Oncogene.

[48]  Stephen W. Wilson,et al.  Flamingo regulates epiboly and convergence/extension movements through cell cohesive and signalling functions during zebrafish gastrulation , 2009, Development.

[49]  S. Casas-Tintó,et al.  Flower forms an extracellular code that reveals the fitness of a cell to its neighbors in Drosophila. , 2010, Developmental cell.

[50]  D. Hanahan,et al.  The Hallmarks of Cancer , 2000, Cell.

[51]  Anup Parikh,et al.  Facultative cheater mutants reveal the genetic complexity of cooperation in social amoebae , 2008, Nature.

[52]  H. Richardson,et al.  scribble mutants cooperate with oncogenic Ras or Notch to cause neoplastic overgrowth in Drosophila , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[53]  E. Moreno,et al.  The competitive nature of cells. , 2005, Experimental cell research.

[54]  L. Johnston,et al.  Soluble factors mediate competitive and cooperative interactions between cells expressing different levels of Drosophila Myc , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  M. S. Steinberg,et al.  The differential adhesion hypothesis: a direct evaluation. , 2005, Developmental biology.

[56]  M. Krieg,et al.  Tensile forces govern germ-layer organization in zebrafish , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.