The Effects of Photoperiod Length, Light Intensity, and Feed Energy on Growth Responses and Meat Yield of Broilers

SUMMARY A study was conducted to assess the effects of photoperiod length (constant 23L:1D vs. a photoperiod program going from decreasing to increasing quantity of light), light intensity (bright vs. a dim, reducing intensity), and feed ME levels (low vs. high) on performance and carcass characteristics of female broilers grown to 56 d. Use of a treatment with early decreasing photoperiod followed by an increasing photoperiod reduced feed consumption and subsequent BW early. However, growth compensation occurred and feed consumption and BW were similar across photoperiod treatments by study end. Likewise, reducing light intensity (from 1 to 0.25 fc) stimulated feed consumption and a subsequent BW improvement early, as compared with high-intensity (2 fc) lighting maintained at a constant level. However, the disparity in feed consumption and BW, as influenced by light intensity, did not persist throughout the growing period. Feed conversion was not noticeably affected by photoperiod or light intensity treatments. Minimal effects of lighting were observed for carcass or part yields; however, there appeared to be a subtle substitution effect between leg, wing, and breast yield influenced by lighting program. Birds exposed to the decreasing– increasing photoperiod and dim, reducing light treatments yielded more leg and wing at the expense of breast. Feeding a low ME diet resulted in increased feed consumption and feed conversion. However, birds consuming a low ME diet were more uniform. No effects of treatment on mortality were measured. These data indicate that a decreasing–increasing photoperiod can be used effectively to reduce early growth, yet allow birds to compensate as they approach market age. Low intensity lighting, however, appears to stimulate early feed consumption and growth, although this effect is transitory. Furthermore, the increased feed conversion of birds grown on the low energy diet may make its use less desirable.

[1]  J. D. May,et al.  The effect of photoperiod and nutrition on ascites incidence in broilers. , 1996, Avian diseases.

[2]  H. Classen,et al.  Photoperiodic effects on performance and leg abnormalities in broiler chickens. , 1989, Poultry science.

[3]  J. A. Renden,et al.  Live performance and yields of broilers provided various lighting schedules. , 1991, Poultry science.

[4]  R. Young.  The Energy Value of Fats and Fatty Acids for Chicks I. Metabolizable Energy , 1961 .

[5]  J. Holsheimer,et al.  Effect on Performance, Carcass Composition, Yield, and Financial Return of Dietary Energy and Lysine Levels in Starter and Finisher Diets Fed to Broilers , 1993 .

[6]  F. Robinson,et al.  Effects of increasing photoperiod length on performance and health of broiler chickens. , 1991, British poultry science.

[7]  J. Feddes,et al.  Growth, body composition, and plasma androgen concentration of male broiler chickens subjected to different regimens of photoperiod and light intensity. , 1992, Poultry science.

[8]  H. Kassim,et al.  The effects of dietary energy levels on the carcass composition of the broilers , 1996 .

[9]  E. Moran,et al.  Lighting programs for broilers that reduce leg problems without loss of performance or yield. , 1996, Poultry science.

[10]  R. C. Newberry,et al.  Effects of lighting pattern and dietary tryptophan supplementation on growth and mortality in broilers. , 1993, Poultry science.

[11]  D. C. Foss,et al.  Fat absorption by the very young chick. , 1972, Poultry science.

[12]  H. Classen,et al.  Effects of increasing photoperiod length and anticoccidials on performance and health of roaster chickens. , 1992, Avian diseases.

[13]  R C Newberry,et al.  Light intensity effects on performance, activity, leg disorders, and sudden death syndrome of roaster chickens. , 1986, Poultry science.

[14]  S. Scheideler.  Research Note: Effect of Various Light Sources on Broiler Performance and Efficiency of Production Under Commercial Conditions , 1990 .

[15]  B. Robinzon,et al.  Effect of light source and regimen on growing broilers. , 1999, British poultry science.

[16]  J. A. Renden,et al.  Research Note: Comparison of Restricted and Increasing Light Programs for Male Broiler Performance and Carcass Yield , 1993 .

[17]  Eddy Decuypere,et al.  Effect of intermittent lighting, light intensity and source on the performance and welfare of broilers , 1996 .

[18]  H. H. Spechter,et al.  The effects of light illuminance and wavelength on the growth of broiler chickens , 1982, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[19]  J. Harter-Dennis,et al.  The effect of increasing photoperiod and food restriction in sexed broiler-type birds. I. Growth and abdominal fat cellularity. , 1992, British poultry science.

[20]  W. Dozier,et al.  Live performance and meat yield responses of broilers to progressive concentrations of dietary energy maintained at a constant metabolizable energy-to-crude protein ratio , 2004 .