Development and application of a strawberry yield-monitoring picking cart

Abstract Strawberries in California have a $2 billion direct economic impact on the state; however, they are currently produced based only on uniform field management techniques. Creating yield maps of strawberries could allow for variable-rate and site-specific applications of inputs, which could improve productivity and reduce environmental pollution. This paper presents the development and application of an instrumented strawberry-picking cart for yield mapping. During manual harvest of strawberries planted on raised beds, pickers walk inside the furrows, pick fruit from the beds on both sides, and deposit them into a tray placed on a picking cart. A ‘smart’ picking cart, similar to the standard carts, has been designed and instrumented with several types of sensors including load cells, a real-time kinematic global positioning system (RTK GPS), a microcontroller, and an inertial measurement unit (IMU). This instrumented cart serves two purposes: to work in sync with tray-transporting robots during robot-aided strawberry harvesting, and to create yield maps of strawberry fields. A yield map for an approximately 300 m 2 plot of a strawberry field in Salinas, California, was generated after the cart was calibrated. During the yield-monitoring experiment, 13.5 trays, each with a capacity of about 4.2 k g of strawberries, were filled with fruit. The mean prediction accuracy of the mass of full trays measured by the load cells was calculated to be 4.8 % .

[1]  Paulo Sérgio Graziano Magalhães,et al.  Yield Monitoring of Sugar Cane , 2007 .

[2]  D.Sc. Joseph Berkson.  Are there Two Regressions , 1950 .

[3]  Farangis Khosro Anjom,et al.  Development of a linear mixed model to predict the picking time in strawberry harvesting processes , 2018 .

[4]  H. Levene.  Robust tests for equality of variances , 1961 .

[5]  Morton B. Brown,et al.  Robust Tests for the Equality of Variances , 1974 .

[6]  J. Neter,et al.  Applied Linear Regression Models , 1983 .

[7]  G. Geoffrey Vining,et al.  The Prediction Properties of Classical and Inverse Regression for the Simple Linear Calibration Problem , 2010 .

[8]  R. O’Brien,et al.  A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors , 2007 .

[9]  S. Chow,et al.  On the Difference between the Classical and Inverse Methods of Calibration , 1990 .

[10]  W. M. Miller,et al.  EVALUATION OF WEIGHING SYSTEMS FOR CITRUS YIELD MONITORING , 1999 .

[11]  D. L. Massart,et al.  Inverse calibration predicts better than classical calibration , 1998 .

[12]  Calvin D. Perry,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A LOAD CELL YIELD MONITOR FOR PEANUT , 1999 .

[13]  W. M. Miller,et al.  Low-cost automatic yield mapping in hand-harvested citrus , 1999 .

[14]  Shrini K. Upadhyaya,et al.  Development of a tomato load/yield monitor , 1999 .

[15]  J. Tellinghuisen,et al.  Inverse vs. classical calibration for small data sets , 2000, Fresenius' journal of analytical chemistry.

[16]  Bo Liu,et al.  Portable weighing system for monitoring picker efficiency during manual harvest of sweet cherry , 2012, Precision Agriculture.

[17]  W. M. Miller,et al.  A DGPS Yield Monitoring System for Florida Citrus , 2001 .