How abstract concepts emerge from metaphorical images: The metonymic way

Abstract While concrete concepts can be graphically represented within the pictorial mode by showing the referent that they designate, abstract concepts lack concrete referents that can be easily depicted. Nonetheless, in verbo-pictorial metaphors viewers are typically invited to construct comparisons between entities and this process often involves abstract concepts. This paper investigates the role of metonymy in abstract concepts representation within the pictorial mode. By means of qualitative and quantitative analyses we show how various types of metonymy, extracted from existing lists of metonymies identified within the cognitive linguistic literature, can motivate the emergence of abstract concepts in the analysis of verbo-pictorial metaphors. We discuss the results in relation to abstract concepts' cognitive grounding, proposing the Abstraction by Metonymy principle.

[1]  René Dirven,et al.  Metonymy and metaphor: different mental strategies of conceptualisation , 1993 .

[2]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics: The Human Conceptual System , 2012 .

[3]  Marianna Bolognesi,et al.  Reliability in content analysis: The case of semantic feature norms classification , 2016, Behavior Research Methods.

[4]  D. Geeraerts,et al.  Metonymy as a prototypical category , 2006 .

[5]  G. Steen,et al.  The Paradox of Metaphor: Why We Need a Three-Dimensional Model of Metaphor , 2008 .

[6]  Günter Radden,et al.  Towards a Theory of Metonymy , 1999 .

[7]  Jelte M. Wicherts,et al.  Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped domains? A meta-analysis. , 2015, Journal of school psychology.

[8]  Marianna Bolognesi,et al.  Modeling Semantic Similarity between Metaphor Terms of Visual vs. Linguistic Metaphors through Flickr Tag Distributions , 2016, Front. Commun..

[9]  A. Barcelona.  Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads : a cognitive perspective , 2003 .

[10]  John R. Taylor,et al.  语言的范畴化:语言学理论中的类典型 = Linguistic categorization : prototypes in linguistic theory , 1989 .

[11]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[12]  Blanca Kraljevich Mujic,et al.  Multimodal metonymy and metaphor as complex discourse resources for creativity in ICT advertising discourse , 2011 .

[13]  A. Barcelona,et al.  Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a consensus view , 2011 .

[14]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[15]  G. Lakoff,et al.  More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor , 1991 .

[16]  Roman Jakobson,et al.  Fundamentals of Language , 1957 .

[17]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[18]  R. Logie,et al.  Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words , 1980 .

[19]  L. Goossens,et al.  Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action , 1990 .

[20]  Amy Beth Warriner,et al.  Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas , 2014, Behavior research methods.

[21]  Gert Storms,et al.  Examining assortativity in the mental lexicon: Evidence from word associations , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  Z. Kövecses.  The Metaphor–Metonymy Relationship: Correlation Metaphors Are Based on Metonymy , 2013 .

[23]  Marianna Bolognesi,et al.  Using semantic feature norms to investigate how the visual and verbal modes afford metaphor construction and expression* , 2016, Language and Cognition.

[24]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: evidence from property generation. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[25]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Situating Abstract Concepts , 2004 .

[26]  Graham R. Gibbs,et al.  Analysing Qualitative Data , 2008 .

[27]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[28]  Jonathan Dunn,et al.  Modeling Abstractness and Metaphoricity , 2015 .

[29]  Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez,et al.  The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy , 2003 .

[30]  Isabel Negro Alousque.  Pictorial and verbo-pictorial metaphor in Spanish political cartooning , 2014 .

[31]  J. Zlatev,et al.  A cognitive semiotic exploration of metaphors in Greek street art , 2019, Cognitive Semiotics.

[32]  Laura Aina,et al.  Similarity is closeness: Using distributional semantic spaces to model similarity in visual and linguistic metaphors , 2019, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory.

[33]  VisMet: a corpus of visual metaphors , 2018 .

[34]  Neal R. Norrick,et al.  Semiotic principles in semantic theory , 1981 .

[35]  Günter Radden,et al.  Metonymy in language and thought , 1999 .

[36]  Radden Günter.  How metonymic are metaphors , 2002 .

[37]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Deferred Interpretations: Why Starting Dickens is Taxing but Reading Dickens Isn't , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[38]  J. Cutting.  Six tenets for event perception , 1981, Cognition.

[39]  David P. Vinson,et al.  How does emotional content affect lexical processing? , 2013, CogSci.

[40]  W. F. Battig,et al.  Handbook of semantic word norms , 1978 .

[41]  B. Nerlich,et al.  Synecdoche as a cognitive and communicative strategy , 1999 .

[42]  A. Koskela.  Metonymy, category broadening and narrowing, and vertical polysemy , 2011 .

[43]  Jason W. Osborne,et al.  Linking Stereotype Threat and Anxiety , 2007 .

[44]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience , 2004 .

[45]  Ken-ichi Seto,et al.  Distinguishing Metonymy from Synecdoche , 1999 .

[46]  J. Littlemore.  On the role of embodied cognition in the understanding and use of metonymy , 2017 .

[47]  George Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things , 1987 .

[48]  Chad E. Forbes,et al.  An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. , 2008, Psychological review.

[49]  Ken McRae,et al.  Abstract Concepts and Pictures of Real-World Situations Activate One Another , 2018, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[50]  P. Sobrino.  Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Advertising , 2017 .

[51]  Michael Inzlicht,et al.  Stereotype Threat: Theory, Process, and Application , 2011 .

[52]  David A. Balota,et al.  Visual Word Recognition , 2015, Linguistics.

[53]  Charles Forceville,et al.  Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising , 1998 .

[54]  Melvin J Yap,et al.  The Calgary semantic decision project: concrete/abstract decision data for 10,000 English words , 2016, Behavior Research Methods.

[55]  Rudolph W. Schulz,et al.  Parameters of abstraction, meaningfulness, and pronunciability for 329 nouns , 1966 .

[56]  Pierre Fontanier,et al.  Les figures du discours , 1977 .

[57]  A. Ellis,et al.  The neural correlates of semantic richness: Evidence from an fMRI study of word learning , 2015, Brain and Language.

[58]  J. Littlemore.  Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought and Communication , 2015 .